Luis wrote:He wasn't scoring from the opportunity.
Tevez would still do a great job for any team in the PL.
Ofcourse he could have scored from there, he was hardly on the byline. Luis Townsend.
Luis wrote:He wasn't scoring from the opportunity.
Tevez would still do a great job for any team in the PL.
christmasborocooper wrote:That means purposefully touching the ball with your hand.
or yay...christmasborocooper wrote:Nah.
Fey wrote:Ramos is having a mere today.
christmasborocooper wrote:Nah.
The only ambiguous bit, for me, about the goalscoring opportunity rule, is mention of moving towards the goal. Tevez was arguably going away from it but presumably working an angle from which you can shoot shouldn't be help the offender.
bluenine wrote:christmasborocooper wrote:Nah.
The only ambiguous bit, for me, about the goalscoring opportunity rule, is mention of moving towards the goal. Tevez was arguably going away from it but presumably working an angle from which you can shoot shouldn't be help the offender.
I think ambiguous is a good thing. Every rule cannot be straight forward, like every foul in the penalty area should not necessarily be a penalty AND a red card. I think the ref did well yesterday giving the penalty but no red card. A red card would have been too harsh. This is why we need refs to use their judgement.
Decent game by Juventus. But its advantage Real with that away goal.
Puro wrote:The MARCA readers want a straight swap Chicharito for Bale. Chicharito will accept that in a second. Manchester United will accept that right away. But, one has to feel for any player going from Real Madrid to Manchester United - from being at the top to having a feeling that you slipped down a notch. Ain't that right, "Fideo"?
Kimbo wrote:Puro wrote:The MARCA readers want a straight swap Chicharito for Bale. Chicharito will accept that in a second. Manchester United will accept that right away. But, one has to feel for any player going from Real Madrid to Manchester United - from being at the top to having a feeling that you slipped down a notch. Ain't that right, "Fideo"?
Not really, Madrid fans come across as spoiled little shits. Man U fans obviously have their issues but Madrid fans make them look humble and grounded.
Fey wrote:Well neiter the Lesbian nor the Monkey is good enough for Madrid imo. But I can see Bale work at United. Allthough they are also gonna buy CG.
Carvajal also showed why is gettin replaced next season.
Kimbo wrote:What has Bale done to deserve being booed by his own fans? Most clubs fans don't boo players for not being as good as we want them to be. If that was the case I would be following Jack Colback around 24/7 booing.
Are Man U and Arsenal fans booing Di Maria and Ozil, even though they clearly aren't as good in England as they were in Spain?
Forza Italia!Forza Milan! wrote:bluenine wrote:christmasborocooper wrote:Nah.
The only ambiguous bit, for me, about the goalscoring opportunity rule, is mention of moving towards the goal. Tevez was arguably going away from it but presumably working an angle from which you can shoot shouldn't be help the offender.
I think ambiguous is a good thing. Every rule cannot be straight forward, like every foul in the penalty area should not necessarily be a penalty AND a red card. I think the ref did well yesterday giving the penalty but no red card. A red card would have been too harsh. This is why we need refs to use their judgement.
Decent game by Juventus. But its advantage Real with that away goal.
Not so sure about that. I think it's 50-50. Juve are supremely organized and soaked the pressure near the end with relative ease.
I hope Juve go to the Final and go on to win the CL. Yes, they will be insufferable and their hegemony in Italy will be complete, but I prefer to see them triumph for Italy. I have grudging admiration for the way they are run, the strides they have made with revenue, branding, and how well they have cultivated players and a system.
|
|