by Brazilianup Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:49 am
Ricardo Wetzel wrote: Calidad wrote: Ricardo Wetzel wrote: Calidad wrote: Ricardo Wetzel wrote:Romario was better
Nah. Romario was a bit genius, but Ronaldo had absolutely no weakness in his game. Strong, rapid, two footed, skillful, could create, could poach. No holes in his game whatsoever as a striker.
Yeah right... He was never injured, he was never too fat
he had no weakness....
Yea, let's judge a players ability on their later fitness and weight issues (after three cruciates). Van Basten was a waster too I'm guessing yea?
In comparisson with Romario it is a weak point. Romario was lazier so he could play on a high level for a longer period. For instance, Ronaldo played one great season in the Netherlands but the other year he was injured.... That happened to him more than once in his entire career.
I just pointed out one weakness...
Ronaldo played one great season in the Netherlands ,but in that season,everyone was eclipsed by Ronaldo ,include Kluivert ,he was second scorer in that season,only 18 goals,Ronaldo scored 30 League goals ,and Ronaldo scored 44 goals in that season.
And he was not fat,he was strong,he scored two goals for Corinthians yestoday.
And Now we are talking about dribble,Ronaldo's dribble was greatest in the mid 90s and late 90s and ever,Romario was a great scorer,not dribbler