by blutgraetsche Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:53 pm
It's the defending as a team that is the problem, "Umschaltspiel in der Rückwärtsbewegung" to be more precise. Our defenders have excellent records at their respective clubs. There is too much space between midfield and defence once we lose possession. And our pressing isn't as coordinated and well-oiled as it has to be for for such a high line to work, although admittedly this particular aspect seems to have improved in recent matches.
Our attack isn't a weak spot, it's the crown jewel, because midfield and attack have to be seen as one unit, particularly when we're playing a fluid strikerless formation, which we're doing more often these days. Just look how those 36 goals scored in qualification are spread amongst the team. We're not dependent on a striker / forward to score, basically all of our midfield (including the CMs) have goals in them. This makes the attack unpredictable and difficult to defend against. Löw spent years on creating this fluid attacking game, he's come close to achieving what he intended, to his credit that is (although considering the number of gifted attacking players at his disposal, it's arguably no rocket science). But it has come at the cost of neglecting the defensive side of things. My gripe is that he should have focused on the defence first, the priorities basically. You build a team from the back, it's the proper way to do.
As far as the players are concerned, Germany has one weak spot, the LB position. Schmelzer is ok, but he is not of the same class compared to the rest of the team. And we're talking about a player who is starter for Dortmund, the same Dortmund that played in the CL final last year. Striker is not a weak spot because, as already explained, we have all the flexibility. Classical #9 in Gomez, false #9 in Götze, Müller, Reus etc., something in between in Klose. Flexibility and vast experience.