Inter player ratings for the season

Parks lives wrote:Cambiasso's is not very high?

Agooner wrote:the ratings are a joke.

TITO wrote:Yup.
@Bluenine
You missed some ratings there.

Tweedle wrote:Jesus! your fans are very generous!

If you did a poll like that for an EPL club, no-one would get above an 8

Tweedle wrote:Jesus! your fans are very generous!

If you did a poll like that for an EPL club, no-one would get above an 8

TITO wrote:Solari instead of Adriano. I agree, tho both have been useless this season
Cruz and Crespo infront of Maicon. No chance, not this season, Maicon has been brilliant - infact I actually rated him above Matrix this season.
Samuel instead of Maxwell. Both equal IMO, fringe players who delivered when asked
And Burdisso a little bit lower. Although this was his best season. Nah, he is good where he is IMO. He did have an amazing season, next season he might actually replace Cordoba!!

Tweedle wrote:Ronaldo might just scrape above an 8.

After the 7-1 drubbing v Roma they had the vote thing on the BBC and Ronaldo was the only player to score above an 8, and that was in a 7-1 victory!

bluenine wrote:These have been voted by some of the most passionate and knowledgeable Interisti I know... This is from the Inter mailing list, a forum I respect the most on the net...

So an Arsenal fan who probably didn't see more than a couple of Inter games in Serie A this season thinks these are not good enough?? hmmm... what do you disagree with?? (I bet its either Materazzi or Vieira!!)

Agooner wrote:the ratings are a joke.

Tweedle wrote:Also, if Solari and Adriano have been 'useless' then how could they score above a 5?

I take 5 to be 'average' unless of course, Italy has a completely different numbering system to the UK wherbey it goes 0,1,5,6,7,8,9,10

Agooner wrote:

bluenine wrote:These have been voted by some of the most passionate and knowledgeable Interisti I know... This is from the Inter mailing list, a forum I respect the most on the net...

So an Arsenal fan who probably didn't see more than a couple of Inter games in Serie A this season thinks these are not good enough?? hmmm... what do you disagree with?? (I bet its either Materazzi or Vieira!!)

Agooner wrote:the ratings are a joke.

I have actually seen atleast 80% of your games this season( u are the champions, so always on Tv).

I will just run through some of the things i don't agree with:

- stankovic : at the start of the season was poor, u remember me commenting on him in your thread after the roma - inter match, then he went through a purple period between october and november, after that he was just ok till somewhere around end of january - early february and has been shite since.

Figo : shite all season apart from the last few weeks, his number assists is probably fooling some people.

cambiasso: injury aside he's had an Ok season, no where near 8. Missed the most crucial period of the season when roma looked like mounting a title challenge and came back when the tittle was already won.

Adriano: should get no higher than 4.

Zanetti: was probably your best player in the 1st half of the season, have seen him play a lot of poor games in the 2nd half of the season. 9 is too high imo, 8 should be about right.

Cruz: did his job when called upon but 8 is too high for a mere squad player.

Materazzi: your 2nd best player behind zlatan imo, but that's not the case according to the ratings. i would give him an 8.5

Pirlo wrote:Ibra is obviously the standout, but to win the league, your whole squad has to do their job.

Matrerazzi has had an incredible year, Cruz has done his job when asked, Stankovic has been brilliant, Maicon and Maxwell have done excellent jobs and Zanetti, well, Zanetti is Zanetti, he deserves this more than anyone.

Grosso has been poor this year, struggled with form and injury. He should go back to Palermo

Tweedle wrote:a 'wrong example'

Just because I don't like Roma and Inter doesn't make everything I think about Italian football bullshit.

What exactly have I said anywhere thats been proven wrong? I said that Totti was hugely overrated - oh look, correct.

I said that Chivu and Mexes wasn't a better partnership than Rio-Vidic - oh look, correct.

Just because I don't suck off every Italian team doesn't make my opinions any less valuable - if I did, then it would make this place far less interesting anyhow

Tweedle wrote:a 'wrong example'

Just because I don't like Roma and Inter doesn't make everything I think about Italian football bullshit.

What exactly have I said anywhere thats been proven wrong? I said that Totti was hugely overrated - oh look, correct.

I said that Chivu and Mexes wasn't a better partnership than Rio-Vidic - oh look, correct.

Just because I don't suck off every Italian team doesn't make my opinions any less valuable - if I did, then it would make this place far less interesting anyhow

kas wrote:Why is Solari so low? Injured, or just doesn't play?