What do people think ?
I cant decide, part of me thinks it should be Champions V Champions but then again i love watching all the top sides in Europe battle it out.
It's called UEFA cup. And yes the UEFA cup may well become more interesting/entertaining than the Champions cup, but so what.CT wrote:Say Chelsea finished first, what would the champions league be like without the likes of Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool?
Say Barca finished first, would you miss Real Madrid and Valencia?
Having all the top clubs makes it more entertaining, so I think it's fine as it is.
Lucas Deano Neill wrote:Yeah...let's get rid of Madrid,Arsenal,Roma,Bayern and bring in Brondby,St.Gallen etc...
shazlx wrote:It's called UEFA cup. And yes the UEFA cup may well become more interesting/entertaining than the Champions cup, but so what.CT wrote:Say Chelsea finished first, what would the champions league be like without the likes of Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool?
Say Barca finished first, would you miss Real Madrid and Valencia?
Having all the top clubs makes it more entertaining, so I think it's fine as it is.
Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
kas wrote:Deano, I get your point. But who knows, 20 years from now maybe the likes of Brondby and St. Gallen will be on (relatively) equal footing thanks to the boost in money that regular CL participation will give them.
Axeslammer wrote:Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
?!
Have you been on crack ?
Yesterday's match makes cricket look like an exciting game in comparison...
pratically everyone I spoke to today enjoyed yesterday's semi immenselyAxeslammer wrote:Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
?!
Have you been on crack ?
Yesterday's match makes cricket look like an exciting game in comparison...
Lucas Deano Neill wrote:
You also forget that doing this would mean that the UEFA Cup would not be for teams like Tottenham,West Ham,Newcastle,Palermo,Espanyol,Zaragoza etc anymore...
Lucas Deano Neill wrote:shazlx wrote:It's called UEFA cup. And yes the UEFA cup may well become more interesting/entertaining than the Champions cup, but so what.CT wrote:Say Chelsea finished first, what would the champions league be like without the likes of Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool?
Say Barca finished first, would you miss Real Madrid and Valencia?
Having all the top clubs makes it more entertaining, so I think it's fine as it is.
You also forget that doing this would mean that the UEFA Cup would not be for teams like Tottenham,West Ham,Newcastle,Palermo,Espanyol,Zaragoza etc anymore...
I think it would have serious effects on the rest of the domestic leagues if the CL format is changed...Change it...and the top 4 in each division will never be broken.
COTR wrote:pratically everyone I spoke to today enjoyed yesterday's semi immenselyAxeslammer wrote:Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
?!
Have you been on crack ?
Yesterday's match makes cricket look like an exciting game in comparison...
and no they were not all liverpool fans
Axeslammer wrote:Lucas Deano Neill wrote:
You also forget that doing this would mean that the UEFA Cup would not be for teams like Tottenham,West Ham,Newcastle,Palermo,Espanyol,Zaragoza etc anymore...
Just bring back the cup winners cup, will make it a serious prize again in all countries bar England where the FA cup is already a serious prize.
Axeslammer wrote:Lucas Deano Neill wrote:
You also forget that doing this would mean that the UEFA Cup would not be for teams like Tottenham,West Ham,Newcastle,Palermo,Espanyol,Zaragoza etc anymore...
Just bring back the cup winners cup, will make it a serious prize again in all countries bar England where the FA cup is already a serious prize.
Yes but I said only if there was less money for the competition. Also the 2nd tier teams should do better in the league as they wouldn't have a European campaign killing what would probably be a weaker squad.Lucas Deano Neill wrote:shazlx wrote:It's called UEFA cup. And yes the UEFA cup may well become more interesting/entertaining than the Champions cup, but so what.CT wrote:Say Chelsea finished first, what would the champions league be like without the likes of Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool?
Say Barca finished first, would you miss Real Madrid and Valencia?
Having all the top clubs makes it more entertaining, so I think it's fine as it is.
You also forget that doing this would mean that the UEFA Cup would not be for teams like Tottenham,West Ham,Newcastle,Palermo,Espanyol,Zaragoza etc anymore...
I think it would have serious effects on the rest of the domestic leagues if the CL format is changed...Change it...and the top 4 in each division will never be broken.
shazlx wrote:Yes but I said only if there was less money for the competition. Also the 2nd tier teams should do better in the league as they wouldn't have a European campaign killing what would probably be a weaker squad.Lucas Deano Neill wrote:shazlx wrote:It's called UEFA cup. And yes the UEFA cup may well become more interesting/entertaining than the Champions cup, but so what.CT wrote:Say Chelsea finished first, what would the champions league be like without the likes of Arsenal, Man U and Liverpool?
Say Barca finished first, would you miss Real Madrid and Valencia?
Having all the top clubs makes it more entertaining, so I think it's fine as it is.
You also forget that doing this would mean that the UEFA Cup would not be for teams like Tottenham,West Ham,Newcastle,Palermo,Espanyol,Zaragoza etc anymore...
I think it would have serious effects on the rest of the domestic leagues if the CL format is changed...Change it...and the top 4 in each division will never be broken.
CT wrote:COTR wrote:pratically everyone I spoke to today enjoyed yesterday's semi immenselyAxeslammer wrote:Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
?!
Have you been on crack ?
Yesterday's match makes cricket look like an exciting game in comparison...
and no they were not all liverpool fans
Ditto. My Manc friend and my Bristol city friend said it was a really entertaining match - not because the footy was great, just because of the huge atmosphere and suspense.
Ricardo Jol wrote:CT wrote:COTR wrote:pratically everyone I spoke to today enjoyed yesterday's semi immenselyAxeslammer wrote:Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
?!
Have you been on crack ?
Yesterday's match makes cricket look like an exciting game in comparison...
and no they were not all liverpool fans
Ditto. My Manc friend and my Bristol city friend said it was a really entertaining match - not because the footy was great, just because of the huge atmosphere and suspense.
the whole country is on crack
Ricardo Jol wrote:CT wrote:COTR wrote:pratically everyone I spoke to today enjoyed yesterday's semi immenselyAxeslammer wrote:Luis wrote:What we;ve seen though, is two very different but very enjoyable CL ties in the semi's with huge stakes
?!
Have you been on crack ?
Yesterday's match makes cricket look like an exciting game in comparison...
and no they were not all liverpool fans
Ditto. My Manc friend and my Bristol city friend said it was a really entertaining match - not because the footy was great, just because of the huge atmosphere and suspense.
the whole country is on crack
|
|