abundance wrote:Re Motta, Ledesma and Amauri...
I'm not happy with them in the NT.
I'm all for a lax concept of nationality - ie, your home is where you live, and your nationality is what is on your passport. Ancestry is a thing of the past and I don't like the rethorics of patriotism.
BUT, in the case of football NT selections, I think that where you learnt to play football counts a lot.
Maybe it's only my view, but I see national teams as an expression of footballing schools, much more than a mere expression of nationality.
We have a great footballing school down here, with a huge tradition, I think that selecting players who formed elsewhere is just devaluing our school.
Yeah I know Amauri has spent all his pro career here, so you could say that he learnt to be a pro footballer here, but still he came here at 20, after spending all his formative years in Brazil.
More over, we already had a Oriundi phase in our history, and results wise that was the worst era of our WC history.
Pozzo successfully used the Oriundi for Italy for Italy's first two WC wins.... infact the only time Italy won the world cup without any Oriundi was in 1982
But I completely understand where you are coming from.... unfortunately, this is how the rules are, and you lose competitive advantage if you refuse to use all resources available to you... I agree with Rinaldi's take on this (one of the better bloggers at Football Italia):
In truth, it had to be this way. The new CT will want to cast his net as wide as possible in order to study all the options at his disposal. If overseas-born players are eligible and can add something to the squad then why not run the rule over them at the very least? Not everyone may agree with their inclusion but, if you don’t, you risk handicapping yourself against opponents willing to use the regulations to their advantage
http://football-italia.net/blogs/gr100.html