Owen was the best Liverpool player IMO, I even think he was more important to us than Stevie G was, I loved watching him play and score.
He's meant to be back in April I think, can he still make a name for himself at Newcastle?
Kimbo wrote:If he gets fit yes. He's had the best treatment possible from the daddy of knee specialists, he's the chap that sorted Bellamy, Ruud, Larsson, Ronaldo, Shearer, and Del Piero - All these guys managed to continue there career. He says that he surgery will pro-long his career.
He lost his pace a long time ago IMO, he's been relying on his footballing brain to be in the right place at the right time, no injury is going to take that away. I'm confident he can come back and still get a fair amount of goals.
I don't really care about the England team to be honest, i'd rather they stayed away from Owen and Dyer. And it probably is a poor return for a £17m man, we'll have to wait and see.Roger_Hunt wrote:Kimbo wrote:If he gets fit yes. He's had the best treatment possible from the daddy of knee specialists, he's the chap that sorted Bellamy, Ruud, Larsson, Ronaldo, Shearer, and Del Piero - All these guys managed to continue there career. He says that he surgery will pro-long his career.
He lost his pace a long time ago IMO, he's been relying on his footballing brain to be in the right place at the right time, no injury is going to take that away. I'm confident he can come back and still get a fair amount of goals.
Depends what you mean Kimbo. I reckon he'll be at best a 12-15 goal a season man - and that's if he recovers well from the knee surgery - remembering that he's crap at penalties.
That won't be enough to get past Crouchino and Rooney into the England first team (barring injuries of course), and looks like a poor return for a £17m striker to me.
Kimbo wrote: I don't really care about the England team to be honest, i'd rather they stayed away from Owen and Dyer. And it probably is a poor return for a £17m man, we'll have to wait and see.
Even Defoe?110% wrote:Owen used to have 2 special abilities, speed and being in the right place. He lost the speed, but he still gets in the right place to score and he's a good finisher. I reckon he'll still be amongst the top strikers when he gets back, although not sure Newcastle is the right place for him. Surely if his hamstrings have to be taken care of, and he can only play a certain number of games a season he would be ideal for the bench of 1 of the bigger teams, coming on to score like the manu sub solkesar (spelling), however no-one would pay too much for him so he might be stuck where he is.
Not sure that England works with rooney and crouch together. Owen works better with either, and for the moment defoe, johnson etc would still be behind him.
110% wrote:
Not sure that England works with rooney and crouch together. Owen works better with either, and for the moment defoe, johnson etc would still be behind him.
TeamSpirit™ wrote:Defoe is shit according to some...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8mbFFCqCgY
Never Mind. *sigh*
DD wrote:Defoe is getting exactly what he needed: a good run of games to get his confidence back.
Its criminal that neither he or D. Bent (or both) went to the WC.
Saintsarama wrote:110% wrote:
Not sure that England works with rooney and crouch together. Owen works better with either, and for the moment defoe, johnson etc would still be behind him.
They don't, in large part due to Rooney's failure to play the role the team needs him to play in that system, whereby 75% of the time he's supposed to be goalside of Crouch.
The Real White Powder wrote:TeamSpirit™ wrote:Defoe is shit according to some...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8mbFFCqCgY
Never Mind. *sigh*
said it for ages, I'd go back and try and find the original post on 606 if i could be bothered to be that sad- Defoe is the most mobile player in England- there is not another player who can turn on a 6pence like he can.
He is underrated because he hasnt been banging them in during his career, and because he hasnt always been great for England,
but he's bubbling along nicely.
Unlike Owen, his career has been following a nice healthy progression whereby he will probably peak at 28-30, and not have injured/worn himself out by 25, as has clearly been the case with Owen/Ronaldo (Rooney in 5 years??) who shot to prominence far too early
But Owen is hardly at his peak now, is he.110% wrote:Owen didn't have that problem with heskey, fowler, litmannen etc at liverpool. He was number 1 because he was that good. At his peak he was a class above defoe.
110% wrote:DD wrote:Defoe is getting exactly what he needed: a good run of games to get his confidence back.
Its criminal that neither he or D. Bent (or both) went to the WC.
I agree that one should have been there instead of walcott and the other instead of jenas maybe.
Defoe is not even guaranteed for the england squad let alone the team. I feel he needs to score close to 20 goals in a season, or to show something in big games. Owen never scored 20 goals either but virtually won an FA cup final on his own, and delivered in many big england games. What are defoe's season tallies for example?
Before anyone jumps out and says he can't get in the team ahead of robbie keane and berbatov/mido, well if he was as good as some claim then he should be the first name down and one of the others who might best compliment him should play. Owen didn't have that problem with heskey, fowler, litmannen etc at liverpool. He was number 1 because he was that good. At his peak he was a class above defoe.
Where he falls down compared to Owen is understanding "The moment" i.e when to spring an offside trap, having great movement to make sure you're in the right place at the right time, and the general clinical finishing which Owen posseses
|
|