Beckham to be loaned out already

http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=469244&CPID=219&clid=114&lid=2&title=Lalas+opens+door+to+Becks+loan&channel=football_home&

LA Galaxy president Alexei Lalas has admitted David Beckham could be loaned out to a European team, but this stance has not been adopted by the club's coach Frank Yallop.

Beckham's return to the England fold has heightened speculation he could be loaned to a team in Europe when the MLS season ends in November, in order to boost his chances of playing at Euro 2008.

Galaxy officials initially gave the rumour short shrift, but Lalas' stance has since softened.

"We always consider possibilities that will make the player better as a soccer player and therefore make him a much more valuable asset because of that experience of going to play with another team on loan, or if we felt it made proper business sense and it is usually a combination of the two," Lalas said on Sky Sports News.

Yallop, though, believes Beckham would be better served putting his feet up once the American season draws to a close.

"We have a long season and a long pre-season, so he will need the break at the end of our season in October or November," said Yallop.

"We will need to give him a break and he will need a test, so I don't see any loan deals going on with David."

Beckham has not been drawn to comment on the speculation, but has made no secret of his desire to extend his England career and a loan move could suit the 32-year-old.

Newcastle watch out, here comes Becks.

DD wrote:Newcastle watch out, here comes Becks.

Mike Ashley isn't interested apparently. And why would he? We shouldn't be loaning anybody.

DD wrote:Newcastle watch out, here comes Becks.

Watch out ?!

*rejoice* !

He's been *phenomenal* for Real the past months and hardly gets any credit for it on these boards.

Kimbo wrote:

DD wrote:Newcastle watch out, here comes Becks.

Mike Ashley isn't interested apparently. And why would he? We shouldn't be loaning anybody.

You're missing the bigger picture: think of the shirt sales!

And I think he could take over some of Solano's and Emre's set pieces.

The man is a Legend. End of.

Kimbo wrote:

DD wrote:Newcastle watch out, here comes Becks.

Mike Ashley isn't interested apparently. And why would he? We shouldn't be loaning anybody.

Middlesborough loaned Woodgate and he was a great player for them last year.

If the opportunity is there to loan a good player, why not?

Beckham since his return to the team has played a major role in turning the fortunes of Real Madrid around, he has been brilliant. Axe is right he doesnt get enough credit on this board. If it was any other player who has played the way he has recently, the hype on here would have been unreal.

Anyway the question shouldnt be is Beckham good enough for Newcastle, but is Newcastle good enough for Beckham.

Becks said he wouldn't return to the EPL to play against MU.

Rez wrote:Beckham since his return to the team has played a major role in turning the fortunes of Real Madrid around, he has been brilliant. Axe is right he doesnt get enough credit on this board. If it was any other player who has played the way he has recently, the hype on here would have been unreal.



Anyway the question shouldnt be is Beckham good enough for Newcastle, but is Newcastle good enough for Beckham.

Wrong.

The question is is Beckham good enough for Newcastle. The answer - yes, but only if the deal is permanent, we shouldn't touch him on loan.

Cesc wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

DD wrote:Newcastle watch out, here comes Becks.

Mike Ashley isn't interested apparently. And why would he? We shouldn't be loaning anybody.

Middlesborough loaned Woodgate and he was a great player for them last year.

If the opportunity is there to loan a good player, why not?

That's totally different. Boro had the option of making it permanent, and Woodgate doesn't have a media circus following him around.

We should only use loans if we're desperate(eg Onyewu), are we desperate? f@ck no.

Kimbo wrote:

Rez wrote:Beckham since his return to the team has played a major role in turning the fortunes of Real Madrid around, he has been brilliant. Axe is right he doesnt get enough credit on this board. If it was any other player who has played the way he has recently, the hype on here would have been unreal.



Anyway the question shouldnt be is Beckham good enough for Newcastle, but is Newcastle good enough for Beckham.

Wrong.

The question is is Beckham good enough for Newcastle. The answer - yes, but only if the deal is permanent, we shouldn't touch him on loan.

Why you can get him for 3 months and not have to worry about signing him up till he is 35/36. He wouldnt have to settle, he will come in straight away do a good job, will work hard for the team then leave.

I would love for united to sign him on loan, he could teach Ronaldo how to cross and take free kicks. Also with the amount of freekicks Ronaldo wins, he would score a goal every other game. I dont think Fergie would let it happen, but it would be awesome if it did.

Rez wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

Rez wrote:Beckham since his return to the team has played a major role in turning the fortunes of Real Madrid around, he has been brilliant. Axe is right he doesnt get enough credit on this board. If it was any other player who has played the way he has recently, the hype on here would have been unreal.



Anyway the question shouldnt be is Beckham good enough for Newcastle, but is Newcastle good enough for Beckham.

Wrong.

The question is is Beckham good enough for Newcastle. The answer - yes, but only if the deal is permanent, we shouldn't touch him on loan.

Why you can get him for 3 months and not have to worry about signing him up till he is 35/36. He wouldnt have to settle, he will come in straight away do a good job, will work hard for the team then leave.



I would love for united to sign him on loan, he could teach Ronaldo how to cross and take free kicks. Also with the amount of freekicks Ronaldo wins, he would score a goal every other game. I dont think Fergie would let it happen, but it would be awesome if it did.

We want players here for the long term, bringing in a media circus for a few months will be disruptive and will probably piss off Milner.

so im a bit confused at this, they are willing to loan him since the mls season ends when all other leagues begin so that he can get some games in to be called up for england?

I don't think it'll happen.

if our mangement was smart they would loan him in that period and then however we would bring in to replace him could get some time to settle in. it work our great for both parts since then becks should start in a new club and our new player would get less pressure.