Who is/was more important for Chelsea?

I promised Fey at least one more poll about Mourinho leaving, so here goes


Who is (or was) more responsible for Chelsea's current status/reputation/trophy count? (even though Abramovich wants more).

Many Chelsea fans will be extremely annoyed with Abramovich for falling out with Mourinho and losing a winning coach...but IMO it's a chicken and egg situation, because without Abramovich's investment, would Mourinho even be at the club in the first place? Probably not. And although Mourinho is the kind of person who can work with "small-name" players, there's no doubt having the big money signings made his job much easier.

So my vote goes to Abramovich. From Chelsea's perspective, he's probably going to regret this "decision", but I don't think it can be denied that for the amount of money he's put in he deserves to do as he pleases.

Abramovich, i don't see the point in firing a winning coach over the fact the he doesn't play pretty enough football, after all england isn't Spain and chelsea certainly aren't real or barca where champagne football is expected once a coach walks though the door.

Kenyon is trying to expand a brand. Fantasy football and fantasy players help his position.

I'd like to know who the two people who voted for Maureen are.

Frank Lampard and John Terry....

ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMAN

Gotta be Roman.

Roman for his money.
Jose for everything else.

I can't decide.

S4P wrote:Roman for his money.
Jose for everything else.

I can't decide.

you will get your definitive answer in about two years time SP

chelsea may even be able to fill a stadium again low blow

It's a no-brainer really, Roman. Without his money I doubt Mourinho would've signed for Chelsea.