Diego in >>>> fatty Flumps out

what do you think about this

http://goal.com/en/articolo.aspx?contenutoid=618573


-------essien----ballack

malouda----diego---cole

i think chelsea need a player like him, they have no creativtiy in there game

for the bundesliga i hope he stays for a long time, but i wouldn`t bet for that

I'm not sure he would enjoy the Premier league. I'd rather he stays at Bremen, but if not, I think he would be better off in Spain or Italy. He would probably get kicked to pieces here.

Diego is Madrid-bound.

Lampard hesitation to put pen and paper to a new contract + Chelsea scouts watching Diego = Lampard out & Diego in ?

This is just a rumour, but again I think Chelsea are going about things the wrong way. They're just looking for the flavour of the month and the best players around the world, rather than trying to establish a philosophy and then buying players to fit that.

And to make a player like Diego work, you really need a manager who trusts in him fully. Who knows if Grant will even be around next year.

Who is there that can afford lampard's wages? I expect him to stay and see the end of his contract before doing a ballack (moving to another league for money and being found out ).

id rather malouda out to be honest, but not a bad thing if it does happen.

Torrente wrote:Diego is Madrid-bound.

Torrente wrote:Diego is Madrid-bound.

Diego and Robinho are meant to be together!!

I think it would be a great move for chelsea. im not sure it would work out though because Diego likes to dwell on the ball and things have to go at his tempo allthough he has gotten better in germany at this. liked the formation posted with Mikel+Ballack and Diego ahead of them.

Toni Kroos wrote:what do you think about this

http://goal.com/en/articolo.aspx?contenutoid=618573


-------essien----ballack

malouda----diego---cole

i think chelsea need a player like him, they have no creativtiy in there game

for the bundesliga i hope he stays for a long time, but i wouldn`t bet for that

why drop lampard when ballack could be dropped?...

I agree. For Chelsea, Fat Frank looks essential. Doesnt play against Barsnley, they lose.

Comes in against Derby, only goes and scores 4 goals in a 6-1 rout.

Ballsack might have the better reputation, but since he's been at Chelsea, they have won the CC.

When Frank dominated the midfield, they won 2 championships, an FA cup and a league cup.

Fat Frank IS Chelsea. They've hardly been flowing when he hasnt played, so its a shite stick argument. Especially from a Munich fan who, last time the two collided, Fat Frank opened a can of his home made whoopass all over them ;-)

For all the people saying lampard only scores against derby etc, ballack COULDN'T score against Barnsley.

http://sports.yahoo.com/sow/news?slug=reu-englandchelsea&prov=reuters&type=lgns