pick who you think was the best manager this decade, and give your reasons.
(sorry if i missed out anyone)
Messiah wrote:no pep WTF, he is already a better coach the like likes of
Domenech
Houllier
Irueta
and has already schooled jose and SAF and came out on the levels with hiddink
its an out rage and out rage
Santi Claus wrote:Messiah wrote:no pep WTF, he is already a better coach the like likes of
Domenech
Houllier
Irueta
and has already schooled jose and SAF and came out on the levels with hiddink
its an out rage and out rage
I'd like to see Pep turn Deportivo into league champions and CL quarter finalists.
Messiah wrote:Santi Claus wrote:Messiah wrote:no pep WTF, he is already a better coach the like likes of
Domenech
Houllier
Irueta
and has already schooled jose and SAF and came out on the levels with hiddink
its an out rage and out rage
I'd like to see Pep turn Deportivo into league champions and CL quarter finalists.
yeah after posting i was like iruelta shouldn't be their, but pep is still a better coach than him, is wasn't depor back then it was SUPER DEPOR.
I'd like to see any manager no what pep did even with this barca squad, just saying he should be their
Messiah wrote:all of those coaches has had some of the best players in the world to work with, i guess Scolari shouldn't be their because he had ronaldo,dinho and rivaldo to work with or DB who had the likes of figo,zidane and ronaldo
i said it in another trend all top managers have one thing in common, they all have some of the best players in the world to work with.
yet its is used against pep and rijkaard every time a manager argument comes up, i'm not say their are the best, but they are among the best for accomplishing what they did.
Kimbo wrote:I'm pretty sure Rafa's time at Pool should count against him.
Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:I'm pretty sure Rafa's time at Pool should count against him.
A CL win, a CL final and having the best team 2008/2009 ?
Hardly !
Kimbo wrote:Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:I'm pretty sure Rafa's time at Pool should count against him.
A CL win, a CL final and having the best team 2008/2009 ?
Hardly !
They've never had the best team, not once have i seen them as serious title contenders.
Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:I'm pretty sure Rafa's time at Pool should count against him.
A CL win, a CL final and having the best team 2008/2009 ?
Hardly !
They've never had the best team, not once have i seen them as serious title contenders.
You didn't see them as serious contenders last season ?!
Kimbo wrote:Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:I'm pretty sure Rafa's time at Pool should count against him.
A CL win, a CL final and having the best team 2008/2009 ?
Hardly !
They've never had the best team, not once have i seen them as serious title contenders.
You didn't see them as serious contenders last season ?!
Never.
Kimbo wrote:Even if you think they challenged, so what? We've challenged aswell, you don't get anything for it other than CL money.
Effenberg wrote:The decade goes from 2001-2010. Just saying.
Kimbo wrote:Messiah wrote:all of those coaches has had some of the best players in the world to work with, i guess Scolari shouldn't be their because he had ronaldo,dinho and rivaldo to work with or DB who had the likes of figo,zidane and ronaldo
i said it in another trend all top managers have one thing in common, they all have some of the best players in the world to work with.
yet its is used against pep and rijkaard every time a manager argument comes up, i'm not say their are the best, but they are among the best for accomplishing what they did.
Some of those coaches have proven themselves without great players though. Also there is a difference between having some great players and have by far the best squad in football.
Pierre Littbarski wrote:Kimbo wrote:I'm pretty sure Rafa's time at Pool should count against him.
A CL win, a CL final and having the best team 2008/2009 ?
Hardly !
|
|