Re: Premier League Discussion 27/28 Feb 2010 by The Easter Bunny Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:21 pm
Puro wrote:WOW!I just saw what happened to Ramsey. Funny how it's always the same c**t managers who knowing that they're incapable of making their teams play football, tell their players to just 'tackle hard' and commit these type of aggressions: Fat Sam, Steve Bruce, the Scottish c**t from Birmingham, now Pulis...they've got no business managing football teams. Their teams can't play for shite so they won't be missed.
Romford Pele wrote:We're not even down to the bare bones though, it's a lot worse.
Re: Premier League Discussion 27/28 Feb 2010 by Pierre Littbarski Sat Feb 27, 2010 10:26 pm
Difficult wrote:Romford Pele wrote:We're not even down to the bare bones though, it's a lot worse.
No, but Ramsey's shin is.
Da dum tsshh.
3 breaks in 5 years? Can you say the next Dyer?Romford Pele wrote:3 leg breaks in 5 years? So upsetting
Hopefully this is a catalyst. We're not even down to the bare bones though, it's a lot worse.
Di Caniooooo! wrote:3 breaks in 5 years? Can you say the next Dyer?Romford Pele wrote:3 leg breaks in 5 years? So upsetting
Hopefully this is a catalyst. We're not even down to the bare bones though, it's a lot worse.
Rosicky. wrote:Di Caniooooo! wrote:3 breaks in 5 years? Can you say the next Dyer?Romford Pele wrote:3 leg breaks in 5 years? So upsetting
Hopefully this is a catalyst. We're not even down to the bare bones though, it's a lot worse.
For Arsenal, not Ramsey you tool.
Re: Premier League Discussion 27/28 Feb 2010 by Pierre Littbarski Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:15 pm
Kimbo wrote:Wenger needs to apologise to Shawcross.
Kimbo wrote:Wenger needs to apologise to Shawcross.
Puro wrote:Kimbo wrote:Wenger needs to apologise to Shawcross.
One wonders why Wenger did not go after the real culprit. In this case that Pulis c**t.
Kimbo wrote:
I'm Pulis's biggest critic, his teams cheat and get away with it, but i fail to see what i did wrong in this instance. It wasn't a dirty foul.
Re: Premier League Discussion 27/28 Feb 2010 by The Easter Bunny Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:34 pm
L r dd wrote:Rosicky. wrote:Di Caniooooo! wrote:3 breaks in 5 years? Can you say the next Dyer?Romford Pele wrote:3 leg breaks in 5 years? So upsetting
Hopefully this is a catalyst. We're not even down to the bare bones though, it's a lot worse.
For Arsenal, not Ramsey you tool.
TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
Puro wrote:TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
I don't blame Shawcross at all. Sure it was an UNNECESSARY 'tackle', BUT I'm convinced he was following orders from that c**t Pulis. Shawcross's slide was vicious, but not with malice.
The one with absolute malice was the one that Eduardo took from that talentless hoofer (what's that c**t's name? that sad excuse for a football player, what the fuck was his name?
Anyhow, that's my take. Shawcross's wasn't pre-meditated to break Ramsey. The one on Eduardo WAS AS PRE-MEDITATED as they come.
Re: Premier League Discussion 27/28 Feb 2010 by The Easter Bunny Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:41 pm
TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
L r dd wrote:
Agreed Taylor went in to do him. Shawcross reaction showed it's totally not who he is. He's a committed footballer not a thuggish c**t.
Puro wrote:TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
I don't blame Shawcross at all. Sure it was an UNNECESSARY 'tackle', BUT I'm convinced he was following orders from that c**t Pulis. Shawcross's slide was vicious, but not with malice.
The one with absolute malice was the one that Eduardo took from that talentless hoofer (what's that c**t's name? that sad excuse for a football player, what the fuck was his name?
Anyhow, that's my take. Shawcross's wasn't pre-meditated to break Ramsey. The one on Eduardo WAS AS PRE-MEDITATED as they come.
The Easter Bunny wrote:TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
You can't let emotion take control, i've seen 4 leg breaks in my 12 years of footy, 2 of them by one lad. I remember feeling guility because I took my goal kick to Azza, he went by two players dinked it past the keeper then he got taken out. I remember feeling aboustle rage and all our squad instantly wanted to hurt him, their manager took him off because he was worried. This was at U15 football. Even though the GK couldn't of stopped himself from taking azza out I still wanted him sent off. But now I think back to it, probs only a yellow at the worst.
The Shawcross challenge was a lunge but it was a 50-50 if the injury didn't happen it would of been a yellow. MOTD showed his foot as well went into the challenge. I'm sure many people have seen dirtier fouls committed and no injury/red card given.
TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
The Easter Bunny wrote:TheCrazy58 wrote:What Pulis (maybe purposely) does not seem to understand is that Wenger does not in any way imply that Shawcross deliberately broke Ramsey's leg. Of course he didn't. What he takes issue with is that the opposition - especially one-trick ponies like Stoke - are without doubt encouraged to be physical with us as that is the most effective (and often the only) way they can try and play us. If what happened today and with Eduardo and Diaby doesn't back it up I don't know what will.
And for those of you arguing it was not worthy of a red card, let's see what you say when it happens to one of your players.
You can't let emotion take control, i've seen 4 leg breaks in my 12 years of footy, 2 of them by one lad. I remember feeling guility because I took my goal kick to Azza, he went by two players dinked it past the keeper then he got taken out. I remember feeling aboustle rage and all our squad instantly wanted to hurt him, their manager took him off because he was worried. This was at U15 football. Even though the GK couldn't of stopped himself from taking azza out I still wanted him sent off. But now I think back to it, probs only a yellow at the worst.
The Shawcross challenge was a lunge but it was a 50-50 if the injury didn't happen it would of been a yellow. MOTD showed his foot as well went into the challenge. I'm sure many people have seen dirtier fouls committed and no injury/red card given.
The Professor wrote:But i don't blame them for the Ramsey injury, i put the blame entirely on the English press. For years the've been preaching to everyone the best way to play against Arsenal is to kick us off the park. We are a bunch of softies they say. Even 5 year old kids know this by now. It's no coincidence that 3 of our players( Diaby, Eduardo and now Ramsey) have suffered career threatning injuries because of reckless tackles.
Well done to them, their messsage has been well received.
kas wrote:I agree that it's quite disturbing that these ideas of "get stuck in" and "let 'im 'ave it" are so ingrained and wrongly over-appreciated in English football culture, but to blame the media completely is wrong. I don't think it's just the media that convinces a large number of Premiership managers what the most effective way of stopping Arsenal is.
|
|
|
Home