WC 2014 - CONMEBOL qualifiers

Rosicky wrote:Worms, the clue is in the name. Its the World Cup not the South American and European Cup.

I know but nearly all the best teams in the world are in South America and Europe.The only other good teams in the whole world are Ghana,Japan,Mexico,South Korea,U.S.A and maybe Austraila.

For example look at New Zealand,the only teams they had to beat to get in the last world cup were Islands who's populations are less than half a million.But if you are a team in Europe or South America you have to beat quality teams just to qualify.

All I am is saying is Austrailia and New Zealand should fight it out for one place,give the spare place to Europe.

One less rubbish African team as well,give that place to a quality SA side instead.

Justice for Goldado wrote:
Puro the only person who robbed Paraguay when they played us was Cardoza.The ref robbed us(Uruguay) against Ghana,they were allowed to injure our players,get away with 2 blatant penaltys against them and dive to win the freekick which led to Suarez's incident.

Yes, forgot about Ghana too. FIFA were so adamant to see them advance after the gross showing by Africa in their own turf!!!

Fucking corrupt FIFA! FUCK AFRICA! They BLEW IT! AT HOME!

Yes, Africa has over 50 "teams" like Europe, but just like Europe the great majority of them are SHITE! TFS!

The WC entries must be revised. Europe must only be awarded the group winners. Africa must only have four teams. The Africans fucked themselves up in their own house. They embarrassed themselves. Fuck them! Take away African entries to the WC!

Justice for Goldado wrote:
I know but nearly all the best teams in the world are in South America and Europe.The only other good teams in the whole world are Ghana,Japan,Mexico,South Korea,U.S.A and maybe Austraila.

For example look at New Zealand,the only teams they had to beat to get in the last world cup were Islands who's populations are less than half a million.But if you are a team in Europe or South America you have to beat quality teams just to qualify.

All I am is saying is Austrailia and New Zealand should fight it out for one place,give the spare place to Europe.

One less rubbish African team as well,give that place to a quality SA side instead.

FIFA must make the fight even: equal number of entries for America and Europe.

Sick and tired of seeing so much Euro shite at the expense of South America's 6th to 9th team.

For so long it's been us fighting with only one third (sometimes one fourth) of teams of what Europe sends to the World Cup and yet the number of WC trophies won is almost even. This not including the home field factor enjoyed by Europe along with the chicanery of their refs fucking American teams shamelessly.

Just think for a moment, how many WC trophies Europe would have won if Europe only sent three teams (sometimes four) to the World Cup while America got to send 13 (CONMEBOL plus México, USA and Costa Rica) AND most of the WC's were held in America and several times the Euro's were shamelessly fucked by corrupt American biased referreing!

That's what American teams have had to deal with historically, and with all that disadvantage, American teams have done very well.

So are you proposing to just do away with S American qualifying and just grant the whole of South America automatic entry due to the sheer awesomeness of all the teams ?

COTR wrote:So are you proposing to just do away with S American qualifying and just grant the whole of South America automatic entry due to the sheer awesomeness of all the teams ?

You know what they say about people who answer a question with a question.

Answer the fucking question. How many under those same circumstances?

Under those same circumstances, Europe would have won ZERO World Cups! TFS!

WG

Justice for Goldado wrote:

Rosicky wrote:Worms, the clue is in the name. Its the World Cup not the South American and European Cup.

I know but nearly all the best teams in the world are in South America and Europe.The only other good teams in the whole world are Ghana,Japan,Mexico,South Korea,U.S.A and maybe Austraila.

For example look at New Zealand,the only teams they had to beat to get in the last world cup were Islands who's populations are less than half a million.But if you are a team in Europe or South America you have to beat quality teams just to qualify.

All I am is saying is Austrailia and New Zealand should fight it out for one place,give the spare place to Europe.

One less rubbish African team as well,give that place to a quality SA side instead.

You rate South Korea and Australia higher than the Ivory Coast?

The Easter Bunny wrote:

Justice for Goldado wrote:

Rosicky wrote:Worms, the clue is in the name. Its the World Cup not the South American and European Cup.

I know but nearly all the best teams in the world are in South America and Europe.The only other good teams in the whole world are Ghana,Japan,Mexico,South Korea,U.S.A and maybe Austraila.

For example look at New Zealand,the only teams they had to beat to get in the last world cup were Islands who's populations are less than half a million.But if you are a team in Europe or South America you have to beat quality teams just to qualify.

All I am is saying is Austrailia and New Zealand should fight it out for one place,give the spare place to Europe.

One less rubbish African team as well,give that place to a quality SA side instead.

You rate South Korea and Australia higher than the Ivory Coast?

Yes Ivory Coast are massively overrated because they have Drogba and Yaya Toure but at every major tournament they have played in the last 8 years they have been shit.

Justice for Goldado wrote:
Yes Ivory Coast are massively overrated because they have Drogba and Yaya Toure but at every major tournament they have played in the last 8 years they have been shit.

Admittedly the groups they've been in have been very tough for them.

PuroReturns wrote:

COTR wrote:So are you proposing to just do away with S American qualifying and just grant the whole of South America automatic entry due to the sheer awesomeness of all the teams ?

You know what they say about people who answer a question with a question.

Answer the fucking question. How many under those same circumstances?

Under those same circumstances, Europe would have won ZERO World Cups! TFS!

Without Brazil and Argentina (who themselves have become rather pointless since winning their only true WC in 86), South America is on a par with Africa. Uruguay's victories wwre before half the world bothered to take part. 0 World cups or world cup finalists from the other SA teams.

So in comparison to Argentina and Brazil,

Europe has provided finalists Germany, Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Holland, France, England, Spain, semi finalists Turkey, Croatia, Portugal.

Its no contest which continent provides more "shite"

Disco Benny wrote:Europe has provided finalists Germany, Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Holland, France, England, Spain, semi finalists Turkey, Croatia, Portugal.

You forgot finalists Czechoslovakia and semi-finalists Bulgaria, Soviet Union, Belgium, Poland, Yugoslavia and Austria

" South America is on a par with Africa."

We(Uruguay) beat Brazil in their own backyard to win one of our world cups,just a big achievement as any other world cup win.

You are just jealous that we have won 2 WC's and 15 Copa Americas compared to your pathetic 1 WC and ZERO Euros.

"Europe has provided finalists in blah blah blah..."

That's all due to the sheer number of entries. One of them HAS to make it.

Under the same circumstances that South America has been dealt since the beginning, Europe would have won ZERO World Cups! TFS!

All I hear is "Europe has blah blah blah...", but no one dares to contemplate the scenario and the circumstances South America has dealt with from the start.

It takes Europe THREE TIMES and sometimes FOUR TIMES the number of South American teams to win just about the same number of WC's.

And, that's without mentioning the home field advantage enjoyed and the home cooking referreing. TFS!

DEAL WITH THE FACT! Contemplate Europe only sending three teams and trying to beat 13 American teams in WC's? eh!

PuroReturns wrote: "Europe has provided finalists in blah blah blah..."

That's all due to the sheer number of entries. One of them HAS to make it.

Under the same circumstances that South America has been dealt since the beginning, Europe would have won ZERO World Cups! TFS!

All I hear is "Europe has blah blah blah...", but no one dares to contemplate the scenario and the circumstances South America has dealt with from the start.

It takes Europe THREE TIMES and sometimes FOUR TIMES the number of South American teams to win just about the same number of WC's.

And, that's without mentioning the home field advantage enjoyed and the home cooking referreing. TFS!

DEAL WITH THE FACT! Contemplate Europe only sending three teams and trying to beat 13 American teams in WC's? eh!

If Europe sent Germany, Italy + Spain/France/Holland every time (equivalent of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay/other) then Europe would still have a very good record..

None of the American teams besides the Big Three have ever really proved themselves on the world stage.

debaser wrote:
If Europe sent Germany, Italy + Spain/France/Holland every time (equivalent of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay/other) then Europe would still have a very good record..

None of the American teams besides the Big Three have ever really proved themselves on the world stage.

None of the European teams would have won a WC if only three (or four) went to the WC.

For every one of them that crashed in group stage there was always strength in numbers to cover their failures. South America doesn't have that luxury!

It's a Cup competition, you have a bad day and you're out.

It's AMAZING South America has done so well considering the chicanery pulled by the Eurocentric FIFA.

PuroReturns wrote:

debaser wrote:
If Europe sent Germany, Italy + Spain/France/Holland every time (equivalent of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay/other) then Europe would still have a very good record..

None of the American teams besides the Big Three have ever really proved themselves on the world stage.

None of the European teams would have won a WC if only three (or four) went to the WC.

For every one of them that crashed in group stage there was always strength in numbers to cover their failures. South America doesn't have that luxury!

It's a Cup competition, you have a bad day and you're out.

It's AMAZING South America has done so well considering the chicanery pulled by the Eurocentric FIFA.

Using the same argument, South America get to send their best teams so they should in relation perform just as well as the best European teams.

PuroReturns wrote:

debaser wrote:
If Europe sent Germany, Italy + Spain/France/Holland every time (equivalent of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay/other) then Europe would still have a very good record..

None of the American teams besides the Big Three have ever really proved themselves on the world stage.

None of the European teams would have won a WC if only three (or four) went to the WC.

Garbage. Take World Cup 1982. Italy qualify from their group ahead of Cameroon and Peru, then beat both Argentina and Brazil in the 2nd group stage. As Argentina and Brazil clearly the 2 best non-European teams at that time, Italy would've won tournament regardless of how many other European teams were there..

Mexico are the case study for all American teams that aren't Brazil/Argentina/Uruguay. Even though they have played in 14 world cups and hosted 2, they've still never made a semi-final. And only 2 quarter finals (each time when hosting). It's an utterly pathetic record and yet they are the 4th best side in the Americas (reaching the last 4 in more than half the Copa Americas they have participated in)..

PuroReturns wrote: "Europe has provided finalists in blah blah blah..."

That's all due to the sheer number of entries. One of them HAS to make it.

Under the same circumstances that South America has been dealt since the beginning, Europe would have won ZERO World Cups! TFS!

All I hear is "Europe has blah blah blah...", but no one dares to contemplate the scenario and the circumstances South America has dealt with from the start.

It takes Europe THREE TIMES and sometimes FOUR TIMES the number of South American teams to win just about the same number of WC's.

And, that's without mentioning the home field advantage enjoyed and the home cooking referreing. TFS!

DEAL WITH THE FACT! Contemplate Europe only sending three teams and trying to beat 13 American teams in WC's? eh!

All I hear is a loser mentality: conspiracy theories, refs, corruption, numbers, FIFA, home advantage etc etc. Losers always blame others and look for excuses rather than admitting they are just not good enough.

You been crying about this on here for years, it would be much easier to simply admit that Peru (and the other SA teams) are in fact shite, no matter how much you try and lump them in with brasil and argentina

39% of all players took painkillers before games at the last world cup:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18064904

Guess who the biggest pussies were? That's right the North and South Americans.

110% wrote:39% of all players took painkillers before games at the last world cup:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18064904

Guess who the biggest pussies were? That's right the North and South Americans.

According to ten percent, they are pussies for telling the team doctors to infiltrate them so they can go out there and play hurt, risking a more severe injury.

Ten per cent's 'tough guys' are the ones who decide not to get infiltrated and sit out the game like the Germans do all the time when they sprain an ankle. 10% you are an amusing fella, keep participating!

Now, the reason why I came here, I know the Euro 2012 just got underway and it gets the attention, but yesterday South America provided two very entertaining WC qualifying games. PHEW! let alone the 'friendly'

The action continues today when Perú go to Montevideo to shock the world.

Peru are bottom of the group, and that where they are gonna stay.

Our moment to put up or shut up is here!!!

We shall shock the world against Uruguay in their own house...again!!!

http://cmdenvivohd.blogspot.com/2011/12/cmd-en-vivo-gratis-online.html

Goal Uruguay.

Pirlo wrote:Goal Uruguay.

That ball never crossed the line. Fucking refs!!!

PuroReturns wrote:

Pirlo wrote:Goal Uruguay.

That ball never crossed the line. Fucking refs!!!

No way. The team Puro supports being robbed again

I'm watching Uruguay vs Perú and Croatia vs Ireland simultaneously. What a difference! On this side you have two teams threading the needle stringing passes all over the field, on the other side you can see the glaring lack of technique and if there's a goal it's only from a dead ball situation.

Uruguay are in trouble, yes they've got their one goal handicap already (ball never crossed the line) and we are gonna come back to beat them in their own house. TFS!

PuroReturns wrote:

Pirlo wrote:Goal Uruguay.

That ball never crossed the line. Fucking refs!!!

Had money on Uruguay to win as they are part of the international elite and have the Khazars on their side

EA$$$$$YYYYY CAAAAA$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$HHHHHH

WG

debaser wrote:

PuroReturns wrote:

Pirlo wrote:Goal Uruguay.

That ball never crossed the line. Fucking refs!!!

No way. The team Puro supports being robbed again

You're not even watching the game. You are watching shite football in the Euros. TFS!

The Easter Bunny wrote:

PuroReturns wrote:

Pirlo wrote:Goal Uruguay.

That ball never crossed the line. Fucking refs!!!

Had money on Uruguay to win as they are part of the international elite and have the Khazars on their side

EA$$$$$YYYYY CAAAAA$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$HHHHHH

WG

Get ready for your asshole to sweat like a mofo in the second half.

PuroReturns wrote:

debaser wrote:

PuroReturns wrote:

Pirlo wrote:Goal Uruguay.

That ball never crossed the line. Fucking refs!!!

No way. The team Puro supports being robbed again

You're not even watching the game. You are watching shite football in the Euros. TFS!

Of course I'm not. I'm watching an entertaining high-paced encounter in a major international tournament

Tell ya what, it must burn to know that despite Croatia only becoming eligible for World Cup for first time in 1998, they won more world cup matches in just that one tournament than Peru have managed in their entire history