To be fair to Juve, I think they were forced to as Mutu didn't want to play in Serie B...
And Bojinov ain't that bad, its just that Mutu was under rated since his chelsea experience... and now he is back to his best.
If you think about it, Juve got Mutu for free, and then exchanged him for Bojinov.... so Juve basically landed up with Bojinov for free - how bad can that be??
And Bojinov ain't that bad, its just that Mutu was under rated since his chelsea experience... and now he is back to his best.
If you think about it, Juve got Mutu for free, and then exchanged him for Bojinov.... so Juve basically landed up with Bojinov for free - how bad can that be??
TarunDang wrote:bluenine wrote:Juve didn't sell him... just swapped him with Bojinov, whom Deschamps never plays...
Poor lad, one season he was the toast of Serie A and among the brightest prospects in the world, and 2 seasons later he can't make the starting XI in Serie B!TarunDang wrote:Tweedle wrote:Why would Toni be sold though?
They'd be daft to sell him andfor anyone buying him, he doesn't haven't too many seasons at the top left in him
The Viola might want to cash in on him while he is on a high in his career
Anyway they have Mutu doing so well for them
Why did Juve had to sell him away
If bojinov was swapped for Mutu, IMO it was bad trade