Dare I say it, but I really do believe Podolski one day could outperform Toni, and with that, maybe should be started ahead of the olive picking Italian.
Think about it.
I have read this quite a few times here before, and I must add my disagreement to what clearly is the popular belief on this MB.Pierre Littbarski wrote:International tournies atre same standard as UEFA Cup, not CL, and that is the level of Klose/Podolski and Toni to be fair.
$h!t happens sometimes.... the Italy team against holland wasn't too different from the one which won the world cup... there are times good teams play like shite, happens even in the CL... I have seen Inter play some really terrible games...Kimbo wrote:I sort of agree with Pierre tbh. Not about Klose, Podolski, and Toni being UEFA cup quality, but about the tournament. Yes there's been some exciting games, but the quality ain't great as most teams lack cohesion. All apart from Holland if you ask me. Look at Italy, loads of good players but they have played like Cr@p and just kept trying to punt it up to Toni. Last nights game was great aswell, but the quality was awful.
bluenine wrote:I have read this quite a few times here before, and I must add my disagreement to what clearly is the popular belief on this MB.Pierre Littbarski wrote:International tournies atre same standard as UEFA Cup, not CL, and that is the level of Klose/Podolski and Toni to be fair.
IMO a championship like Euro2008 is above the standard of the CL. The quality of players is generally higher, the prestige is higher, the pressure is MUCH higher, and the difference between the best and the worst is lower. While I can understand the arguement that the intl teams have had much less time to gel together as compared to club sides, the higher standard of players and the spirit of playin for your country more than makes up for that. That IMO makes the standard of the competition higher than the CL.
Can you honestly compare the standard of CL group phase with what we have witnessed so far in Euro2008? The quality of games has been brilliant, its rare to see this even in the final stages of the CL competition.
On the second note, I am sure you are just taking the piss regarding the standard of players like Toni and Klose.
Pierre Littbarski wrote:International tournies atre same standard as UEFA Cup, not CL, and that is the level of Klose/Podolski and Toni to be fair.
Pierre Littbarski wrote:
You can import an Adebayor or a Drogba at club level - there isn't a single team at this level who wouldn't improve substantially by having one of those 2.
mongrel hawk wrote:those are different dimensions, you cannot compare them.
Podolski is great for Germany and not so good for his club, but it doesn't mean that his club games are more difficult than his national team games.
there are loads of players who are/were better at their clubs than at their national teams: Diego, Cristiano Ronaldo, Riquelme, Lampard, Gerrard, Henri, Máicon, Toti, Ibrahimovic, etc.
I'd say Robinho too, but he's mediocre at both levels (except in nothing-games against poor opposition, when he becomes a kind of grotesque Garrincha).
as a neutral, I think euro games are being much better to watch than last CL games.
Khadrim wrote:I'm confused by the argument about cohesion as it seems to be mainly about defense. By that logic Greece 2004 would beat any Champions league team.
Khadrim wrote:I'm confused by the argument about cohesion as it seems to be mainly about defense. By that logic Greece 2004 would beat any Champions league team.
bluenine wrote:I have read this quite a few times here before, and I must add my disagreement to what clearly is the popular belief on this MB.Pierre Littbarski wrote:International tournies atre same standard as UEFA Cup, not CL, and that is the level of Klose/Podolski and Toni to be fair.
IMO a championship like Euro2008 is above the standard of the CL.
mongrel hawk wrote:those are different dimensions, you cannot compare them.
Podolski is great for Germany and not so good for his club, but it doesn't mean that his club games are more difficult than his national team games.
there are loads of players who are/were better at their clubs than at their national teams: Diego, Cristiano Ronaldo, Riquelme, Lampard, Gerrard, Henri, Máicon, Toti, Ibrahimovic, etc.
I'd say Robinho too, but he's mediocre at both levels (except in nothing-games against poor opposition, when he becomes a kind of grotesque Garrincha).
as a neutral, I think euro games are being much better to watch than last CL games.
bluenine wrote:mongrel hawk wrote:those are different dimensions, you cannot compare them.
Podolski is great for Germany and not so good for his club, but it doesn't mean that his club games are more difficult than his national team games.
there are loads of players who are/were better at their clubs than at their national teams: Diego, Cristiano Ronaldo, Riquelme, Lampard, Gerrard, Henri, Máicon, Toti, Ibrahimovic, etc.
I'd say Robinho too, but he's mediocre at both levels (except in nothing-games against poor opposition, when he becomes a kind of grotesque Garrincha).
as a neutral, I think euro games are being much better to watch than last CL games.
Pierre Littbarski wrote:there's no doubt that Toni has a good touchand can finishwith both feet and head but he doesn't have pace or a true strike of the ball - on top of this I have serious doubts about his character.
His body language is appauling and he is certainly not someone you'd want on your side when the chips are down, he doesn't have the confidence, aggression or general strength of character that a top striker needs - Fiorentina have missed him terribly
|
|