Todays Transfer Rumours

Kimbo wrote:Viduka is ours.

Linkage

good player, if you want to break into the top 5 or 6 maybe a bit of a backwards step, but if your aim is europe then he's a good signing

Viduka is every big team's bogey player - why do you think Middlesbrough are/were dreaded by the top 4.

He's lazy, inconsistent, slow and fat tough, but when The Duke is on fire he's just about the one of the best strikers there are.

Good thing for Newcastle also is that he isn't too injury-prone.

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:Viduka is ours.

Linkage

good player, if you want to break into the top 5 or 6 maybe a bit of a backwards step, but if your aim is europe then he's a good signing

It's not a backwards step in any way. IMO he would get in any team in the premiership bar Chelsea.

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:Viduka is ours.

Linkage

good player, if you want to break into the top 5 or 6 maybe a bit of a backwards step, but if your aim is europe then he's a good signing

It's not a backwards step in any way. IMO he would get in any team in the premiership bar Chelsea.

Certainly wouldn't get into ours

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:Viduka is ours.

Linkage

good player, if you want to break into the top 5 or 6 maybe a bit of a backwards step, but if your aim is europe then he's a good signing

It's not a backwards step in any way. IMO he would get in any team in the premiership bar Chelsea.

Certainly wouldn't get into ours

He would, he's better than Kuyt, Bellamy, and Crouch.

For someone who criticises my contribution to this board Kimbo it's quite funny to see you reduced to nonesense

Luis wrote:For someone who criticises my contribution to this board Kimbo it's quite funny to see you reduced to nonesense

The stats back me up, the only thing you've got is bias. Viduka has huge talent, you would see that if you watched teams outside of Liverpool.

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:For someone who criticises my contribution to this board Kimbo it's quite funny to see you reduced to nonesense

The stats back me up, the only thing you've got is bias. Viduka has huge talent, you would see that if you watched teams outside of Liverpool.

Did I not say he was a good player? You've lost this one mate, move on to the next

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:For someone who criticises my contribution to this board Kimbo it's quite funny to see you reduced to nonesense

The stats back me up, the only thing you've got is bias. Viduka has huge talent, you would see that if you watched teams outside of Liverpool.

Did I not say he was a good player? You've lost this one mate, move on to the next

Yes, declare victory for no reason at all, that's always the best way to back out of a debate.

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:For someone who criticises my contribution to this board Kimbo it's quite funny to see you reduced to nonesense

The stats back me up, the only thing you've got is bias. Viduka has huge talent, you would see that if you watched teams outside of Liverpool.

Did I not say he was a good player? You've lost this one mate, move on to the next

Yes, declare victory for no reason at all, that's always the best way to back out of a debate.

What debate? you're clearly being biased to try and show me that you think I'm biased, I said Viduka was a good player but then gave an opinion of him at your club which is shared by a good few I'm sure

Luis.

Viduka at his best is better than Crouch, Kuyt and Bellamy.

Parks lives wrote:Luis.

Viduka at his best is better than Crouch, Kuyt and Bellamy.

those 3 at their best are better than Viduka What a silly thing to say

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

Luis wrote:For someone who criticises my contribution to this board Kimbo it's quite funny to see you reduced to nonesense

The stats back me up, the only thing you've got is bias. Viduka has huge talent, you would see that if you watched teams outside of Liverpool.

Did I not say he was a good player? You've lost this one mate, move on to the next

Yes, declare victory for no reason at all, that's always the best way to back out of a debate.

What debate? you're clearly being biased to try and show me that you think I'm biased, I said Viduka was a good player but then gave an opinion of him at your club which is shared by a good few I'm sure

I'm not being biased, i said this along time ago in one of nutboys threads.

Kuyt - 12 in 34
Crouch - 9 in 32
Bellamy - 7 in 27

Viduka - 14 in 29

That tells it's own story.

Viduka is a lazy player though, Kuyt works much much harder and offers a lot more, it was also Kuyt's first season in the premiership, Viduka is now 31, he's slow and he'll need someone to constantly run for him

Luis wrote:Viduka is a lazy player though, Kuyt works much much harder and offers a lot more, it was also Kuyt's first season in the premiership, Viduka is now 31, he's slow and he'll need someone to constantly run for him

Like?

Parks lives wrote:

Luis wrote:Viduka is a lazy player though, Kuyt works much much harder and offers a lot more, it was also Kuyt's first season in the premiership, Viduka is now 31, he's slow and he'll need someone to constantly run for him

Like?

Link up play, Heading, more pace,

And like I said it was his first season in the premiership

Kuyt>>Viduka and we'll see that next season

Luis, what are you on about?

I'd take Viduka over any of your strikers - the olny negative about viduka is his age, in terms of quality though he's better than all 3 of yours

Tweedle wrote:Luis, what are you on about?

I'd take Viduka over any of your strikers - the olny negative about viduka is his age, in terms of quality though he's better than all 3 of yours

Bollocks, you'll all look so foolish next season, I can't do more than wait, so discussing it is useless

Luis wrote:

Tweedle wrote:Luis, what are you on about?

I'd take Viduka over any of your strikers - the olny negative about viduka is his age, in terms of quality though he's better than all 3 of yours

Bollocks, you'll all look so foolish next season, I can't do more than wait, so discussing it is useless

He has a better strike record than ANY of your strikers + he has the class of Crouch combined with fantastic finishing.

Saying Kuyt is a better header is a joke beyond jokes

Just because he plays for an unfashionable team doesn't make him $h!t, you're young though so I guess that explains everything.

I haven't said Viduka is $h!t, jesus, fucking read the thread

Better header?

Better link up play is very arguable as well.

Tweedle wrote:

Luis wrote:

Tweedle wrote:Luis, what are you on about?

I'd take Viduka over any of your strikers - the olny negative about viduka is his age, in terms of quality though he's better than all 3 of yours

Bollocks, you'll all look so foolish next season, I can't do more than wait, so discussing it is useless

He has a better strike record than ANY of your strikers + he has the class of Crouch combined with fantastic finishing.

Saying Kuyt is a better header is a joke beyond jokes

Just because he plays for an unfashionable team doesn't make him $h!t, you're young though so I guess that explains everything.

Lets get this straight. Bellamy IS pretty Cr@p, and you've said that you think Bellamy is a better player than Viduka

Tweedle wrote:Lets get this straight. Bellamy IS pretty Cr@p, and you've said that you think Bellamy is a better player than Viduka

The Bellamy on form yes, but Viduka is only better when our 3 strikers are on $h!t form according to Park, so we cant win, Kuyt has to have a broken leg for Viduka to be better

Luis wrote:

Tweedle wrote:Lets get this straight. Bellamy IS pretty Cr@p, and you've said that you think Bellamy is a better player than Viduka

The Bellamy on form yes, but Viduka is only better when our 3 strikers are on $h!t form according to Park, so we cant win, Kuyt has to have a broken leg for Viduka to be better

When did I say that?

I said if Viduka is at his best and all you're strikers we're at there best. I would take Viduka.

Luis wrote:

Tweedle wrote:Lets get this straight. Bellamy IS pretty Cr@p, and you've said that you think Bellamy is a better player than Viduka

The Bellamy on form yes, but Viduka is only better when our 3 strikers are on $h!t form according to Park, so we cant win, Kuyt has to have a broken leg for Viduka to be better

That doesn't make sense?

Form is temporary, class is permanent. Jesus christ, and on form Darren Ambrose is better than Ronaldinho. It means f@ck all!

In terms of class Viduka pisses all over your strikers

I think age is the big factor here tbh, Luis is too young to have seen Viduka at Leeds and the only time he watches Boro is when they play Liverpool. He doesn't realise Viduka is one of the most talented strikers there has been in the premiership, certainly top 10 IMO.

Kimbo wrote:I think age is the big factor here tbh, Luis is too young to have seen Viduka at Leeds and the only time he watches Boro is when they play Liverpool. He doesn't realise Viduka is one of the most talented strikers there has been in the premiership, certainly top 10 IMO.

You're an absolute tit Kimbo, why try and be patronising, what a joke, it's a sad method to have when debating

Kimbo wrote:I think age is the big factor here tbh, Luis is too young to have seen Viduka at Leeds and the only time he watches Boro is when they play Liverpool. He doesn't realise Viduka is one of the most talented strikers there has been in the premiership, certainly top 10 IMO.

totally agree.

Viduka at Leeds was one of the best strikers in the world for about two seasons to be honest - he was unplayable.

If he'd been English he'd probably have been valued at around £30m around that time

Tweedle wrote:

Kimbo wrote:I think age is the big factor here tbh, Luis is too young to have seen Viduka at Leeds and the only time he watches Boro is when they play Liverpool. He doesn't realise Viduka is one of the most talented strikers there has been in the premiership, certainly top 10 IMO.

totally agree.

Viduka at Leeds was one of the best strikers in the world for about two seasons to be honest - he was unplayable.

If he'd been English he'd probably have been valued at around £30m around that time

That was in the fucking past, jesus, Fowler is the best striker in the premiership then if we're going on the past