City to sign Mpenza

Man City are close to signing Emile Mpenza until the endof the season after he impressed in a trial.

He is only 28 and i think he could be a great buy if we can get him fit, its good to see he feels he has something to prove.

I always liked Mpenza, though he's another Corradi - will play well but is never going to score that many.

Could be a good signing.

One of the Belgian players I actually liked, he was quality around the year 2000/2002.

His form dipped at Schalke though.

used to be great on one of the old championship managers. 97/98 perhaps. edit: actually this might've been mbo mpenza

could be good. but you have to wonder about a player who moved to qatar in his prime footballing age

debaser wrote:used to be great on one of the old championship managers. 97/98 perhaps. edit: actually this might've been mbo mpenza

could be good. but you have to wonder about a player who moved to qatar in his prime footballing age

I'm pretty sure it was Mbo, not Emile. Pretty sure. All the champ managers sort of blend into one.

Emile is the better of the two though.
great at jumping!

Emile was the one that was great in Champo

He used to have near perfect stats apart from his strength I seem to remember.

Mbo was classed as an attacking midfielder in the old champo versions

How many strikers City need , Corradi , Samaras , Vassell.

4

With Corradi, Vas and Samaras not scoring much Mpenza should help take the pressure off plus with Danny Sturridge coming through or attacking options suddenly look a lot better.

Tweedle wrote:Emile was the one that was great in Champo

He used to have near perfect stats apart from his strength I seem to remember.

Mbo was classed as an attacking midfielder in the old champo versions

That's because mbo is. He plays more as a right winger who cuts inside than a striker.

i think he is an average player

Well you would. typical dutchie, doesnt apreciate out technical expertise.

Com back when you can produce players like De Mul and Dembele.

Kevin wrote:Well you would. typical dutchie, doesnt apreciate out technical expertise.

Com back when you can produce players like De Mul and Dembele.

De Mul is terrible as well

Dembele and especially Martens are superb...

Kevin wrote:Well you would. typical dutchie, doesnt apreciate out technical expertise.

Com back when you can produce players like De Mul and Dembele.

I thought that racists would be immediately banned under the new regime?

Saintsarama wrote:

Kevin wrote:Well you would. typical dutchie, doesnt apreciate out technical expertise.

Com back when you can produce players like De Mul and Dembele.

I thought that racists would be immediately banned under the new regime?

If any dutch person finds that racist, then i will ban myself...

Ricardo Jol wrote:

Kevin wrote:Well you would. typical dutchie, doesnt apreciate out technical expertise.

Com back when you can produce players like De Mul and Dembele.

De Mul is terrible as well

He's good, its just his club coach makes him 'terrible' in your eyes.

Kevin wrote:

Saintsarama wrote:

Kevin wrote:Well you would. typical dutchie, doesnt apreciate out technical expertise.

Com back when you can produce players like De Mul and Dembele.

I thought that racists would be immediately banned under the new regime?

If any dutch person finds that racist, then i will ban myself...

It's a matter of principle, not whether someone actually takes offence. Otherwise it just becomes a game of playing the victim card. Ban yourself, otherwise I'm going to simply ignore the rules again and cause as much trouble as possible.

Whatever, you clearly do not have the cultural or football knowledge to relaise that my comment was tongue in cheek as the dutch have a reputation for producing technically gifted players wereas the belgians do not.
This means that it was, ironicaly, more of a compliment to the dutch due to their ability to create technically good footballers, and as i'm sure you will understand, Arsenal fans likne nothing more than technically good footballers.


Oh, and if you cause as mcuh trouble as possible; you'll get banned <ale>

If I get banned for making the same sorts of jokes as you then that just makes the mods part of the same hypocrisy. I'm perfectly happy with that - I can live without this place for a bit. But hypocrites always end up hating themselves. If you wish to provoke that, go right ahead.

Your welcome to make the same jokes as moi, and please use that as a benchmark as let's be honest here, you passed the benchmark on several occasions.

Who defines the benchmark? The hypocrite moderators?

I find it hilarious that those supposedly upholding the principles of equality (i.e. opposing oppression) seek to censor and ban anyone who transgresses their arbitrarily designed 'benchmarks'.

Who the fuck do you want to define benchmarks?

I find it hilarious that those supposedly upholding the principles of equality (i.e. opposing oppression) seek to censor and ban anyone who transgresses their arbitrarily designed 'benchmarks'.

You just defined most succesful societies there so if you can't accept how that is how most societies work, i'm not going to waste my time dealing with a closet anarchist.

Kevin wrote:Who the fuck do you want to define benchmarks?

The collective of posters here, rather than an unelected elite.

I find it hilarious that those supposedly upholding the principles of equality (i.e. opposing oppression) seek to censor and ban anyone who transgresses their arbitrarily designed 'benchmarks'.

You just defined most succesful societies there so if you can't accept how that is how most societies work, i'm not going to waste my time dealing with a closet anarchist.

Most societies don't work - New Orleans is still rotting, Britain isn't a democracy, and capitalism is making the average person poorer, not richer.

Saintsarama wrote:

Kevin wrote:Who the fuck do you want to define benchmarks?

The collective of posters here, rather than an unelected elite.

Well naturally, we welcome the masses, allow the proletariat to rise up and allow it's voice to be heard. Go for it!

I find it hilarious that those supposedly upholding the principles of equality (i.e. opposing oppression) seek to censor and ban anyone who transgresses their arbitrarily designed 'benchmarks'.

You just defined most succesful societies there so if you can't accept how that is how most societies work, i'm not going to waste my time dealing with a closet anarchist.

Most societies don't work - New Orleans is still rotting, Britain isn't a democracy, and capitalism is making the average person poorer, not richer.

ANARCHIST.

Well that's the best mdel we've got so im going to be following that one thanks very much.

Id love to see a communist forum, lets make all the people admins.

Edit: i fucking hate HTML.

'It's the best we've got, even thought it doesn't achieve what it claims to'.

You're right to call me an anarchist, in that I'd prefer no society to a hypocritical, failing one. But ultimately, I'm a utopian.

An inhabitant of utopia?

Not a bad joke, for you.

A compliment!
Why thankyou.

Your* welcome.





*You're