he is more a rightback than alves, alves could play as midfielder too,
i know that most people will vote for alvez, espcially all english and english supporters her, because he is joining chelsea
Parks lives wrote:Not sure but certainly, Gary Neville > Lahm, Alves.
Deisler wrote:i think its lahm
blutgraetsche wrote:I hate these kind of threads.
I HATE PLAYER TO PLAYER COMPARISONS!
This said, it's still not clear who is better, Gerrard or Lampard.
blutgraetsche wrote:So who is better, Frings or Ballack?
Parks lives wrote:Lampard.
S4P wrote:
Ballack.
But Scholl > both
S4P wrote:blutgraetsche wrote:So who is better, Frings or Ballack?
Ballack.
But Scholl > both
Batman wrote:How much difference is there in Lahms performances when he plays left back and when he plays right back? because i have mainly seen him play at left back.
Batman wrote:How much difference is there in Lahms performances when he plays left back and when he plays right back? because i have mainly seen him play at left back.
blutgraetsche wrote:S4P wrote:
Ballack.
But Scholl > both
ARGH. Scholl is no central midfielder, at least he is a very different kind of player. It's like comparing Gerrard to Lennon.
I really wouldn't know who to prefer to be honest. Probably Frings, because he suits the Werder system more.
S4P wrote:
I know, but Scholl is a legend.
blutgraetsche wrote:Parks lives wrote:Lampard.
Thanks.
Lahm = more complete fullback (better defensively)
Alves = more flexible allround player, e.g. as RM
TM wrote:Oleguer > Miguel Torres > Alves > Lahm
Oleguerisntthatbad wrote:TM wrote:Oleguer > Miguel Torres > Alves > Lahm
|
|