Kimbo wrote:Parks lives wrote:Yes, arrest people because there isn't evidence.
You can't do that parky.
Then why should Ronaldo be arrested/suspended for a crime that has no evidence of him committing.
Kimbo wrote:Parks lives wrote:Yes, arrest people because there isn't evidence.
You can't do that parky.
supermadrid wrote:i also didnt understand how this could happen. but would they just make up such stuff without having any truth to it? i dont know how english papers are so you guys know better how much credibility they have.L.r.d wrote:Well i read about it yesterday. Seems like bollocks, Everton say they were not aware of any incident. No camera's picked it up. He claimed Ronaldo stepped on his arm while leaning over the advertising boards to get the ball. Now unless this guy had his arm on the floor how in the f@ck did he step on his arm without hardly anyone seeing?
If he did do it, then good on him he aint fucking about this season. Annoy him and expect a headbutt or a broken arm
Raifael wrote:Kimbo wrote:Parks lives wrote:Yes, arrest people because there isn't evidence.
You can't do that parky.
Then why should Ronaldo be arrested/suspended for a crime that has no evidence of him committing.
Kimbo wrote:Raifael wrote:Kimbo wrote:Parks lives wrote:Yes, arrest people because there isn't evidence.
You can't do that parky.
Then why should Ronaldo be arrested/suspended for a crime that has no evidence of him committing.
Who is saying he should be arrested even if no evidence is found?
Raifael wrote:Kimbo wrote:Raifael wrote:Kimbo wrote:Parks lives wrote:Yes, arrest people because there isn't evidence.
You can't do that parky.
Then why should Ronaldo be arrested/suspended for a crime that has no evidence of him committing.
Who is saying he should be arrested even if no evidence is found?
Read the 1st page
Kimbo wrote:Raifael wrote:Kimbo wrote:Raifael wrote:Kimbo wrote:Parks lives wrote:Yes, arrest people because there isn't evidence.
You can't do that parky.
Then why should Ronaldo be arrested/suspended for a crime that has no evidence of him committing.
Who is saying he should be arrested even if no evidence is found?
Read the 1st page
It's only lulu ffs.
Raifael wrote:Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:I doubt the Premier League would suspend him for that.
You serious?
It wasn't in the referee match report. First lets have video footage.
Tweedle wrote:Remember Cantona?
Parks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:Remember Cantona?
Remember seeing it.
Parks lives wrote:No, I saw the coverage though.
Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:I doubt the Premier League would suspend him for that.
You serious?
It wasn't in the referee match report. First lets have video footage.
Well obviously if he's founf not guilty then the premiership won't do anything
If he's found to have stamped on someone arm and broken it though, the EPL will take serious action. Remember Cantona?
Raifael wrote:Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:I doubt the Premier League would suspend him for that.
You serious?
It wasn't in the referee match report. First lets have video footage.
Well obviously if he's founf not guilty then the premiership won't do anything
If he's found to have stamped on someone arm and broken it though, the EPL will take serious action. Remember Cantona?
Unlike Cantona i doubt Ronaldo had any intent , if what this gentleman says is true.
Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:Tweedle wrote:Raifael wrote:I doubt the Premier League would suspend him for that.
You serious?
It wasn't in the referee match report. First lets have video footage.
Well obviously if he's founf not guilty then the premiership won't do anything
If he's found to have stamped on someone arm and broken it though, the EPL will take serious action. Remember Cantona?
Unlike Cantona i doubt Ronaldo had any intent , if what this gentleman says is true.
IF it's true, I'm pretty sure he'd at least have realised that he'd stood on someones arm!!! The least he could have done is apologised
Tweedle wrote:Parks lives wrote:No, I saw the coverage though.
So you agree with Rai, that if they find footage of him having done it, the EPL won't take action.
Strange world...
Parks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:Parks lives wrote:No, I saw the coverage though.
So you agree with Rai, that if they find footage of him having done it, the EPL won't take action.
Strange world...
Err, where have I said that?
Parks lives wrote:I'm making the point that it's all immaterial until we see anything.
|
|