Let the banter begin, Prem Weekend 1st December-->

GR-09 wrote:

S4P wrote:

GR-09 wrote:1)Nope it was 0-0-right before half time when the incident happened. thats 1 point at best we could have done with.

That point still would not have got you 4th place.

GR-09 wrote:2)I dont think there was anything wrong with that decision- but i seem to rmemeber in the same season- a Chelsea game where we had 3 legitimate penalty turned down. It must have been a CL game.

Nothing wrong with that decision? Since when was sliding to intercept a pass (Carvalho) and clearing it out of play a free kick to the opposition?

GR-09 wrote:3) I wonder why that is the case... with Jose and the red cards that is.... interesting point that

I was hoping you could tell me this, seen as you told me that Jose and Chelsea received preferential treatment from referees.

I did say a point at best we could have done with - but there was a strong case for all 3 points as Chelsea rarely got forward and we were in a a strong position - and up until that point we were the closest team to scoring.

And when theres a case for all 3 points, we;re talking about a place in next season's Champions League.


Im sure theres more to it than that- on the free kick

but like i said, theres been far more decisions that went your way that season - that game where im struggling to remember- which caused an uproar in liverpool - where we had "3" legit pens turned down - if thats not clear ref bias towards Chelsea, i dont know what is...

And the 05 CL semi - Uncle Romans 6 minutes added time.. which nearly gave Chelsea more time to equalise - nearly cost us a place in the finals again.

And Cech should have been sent off for his tackle on Baros in the same game - and a penalty awarded. The ref came out the next day and said he did Chelsea a massive favour.


Jose always put pressure on referees - whichs why referees choked in Chelsea games - that John Terry "Cech-esque" save springs to mind - dont think he even got booked. - if thats not "preferential treatment" i dont know what is..

West Ham Snowman wrote: Fucking quality

Larsson from 30 yards!
Larsson from 30 yards!
Larsson from 30 yards!
Larsson from 30 yards!

Cinders wrote:

GR-09 wrote:

S4P wrote:

GR-09 wrote:1)Nope it was 0-0-right before half time when the incident happened. thats 1 point at best we could have done with.

That point still would not have got you 4th place.

GR-09 wrote:2)I dont think there was anything wrong with that decision- but i seem to rmemeber in the same season- a Chelsea game where we had 3 legitimate penalty turned down. It must have been a CL game.

Nothing wrong with that decision? Since when was sliding to intercept a pass (Carvalho) and clearing it out of play a free kick to the opposition?

GR-09 wrote:3) I wonder why that is the case... with Jose and the red cards that is.... interesting point that

I was hoping you could tell me this, seen as you told me that Jose and Chelsea received preferential treatment from referees.

I did say a point at best we could have done with - but there was a strong case for all 3 points as Chelsea rarely got forward and we were in a a strong position - and up until that point we were the closest team to scoring.

And when theres a case for all 3 points, we;re talking about a place in next season's Champions League.


Im sure theres more to it than that- on the free kick

but like i said, theres been far more decisions that went your way that season - that game where im struggling to remember- which caused an uproar in liverpool - where we had "3" legit pens turned down - if thats not clear ref bias towards Chelsea, i dont know what is...

And the 05 CL semi - Uncle Romans 6 minutes added time.. which nearly gave Chelsea more time to equalise - nearly cost us a place in the finals again.

And Cech should have been sent off for his tackle on Baros in the same game - and a penalty awarded. The ref came out the next day and said he did Chelsea a massive favour.


Jose always put pressure on referees - whichs why referees choked in Chelsea games - that John Terry "Cech-esque" save springs to mind - dont think he even got booked. - if thats not "preferential treatment" i dont know what is..

Let's start earlier in the season with Arsenal, Carragher should have been sent off for taking down Adebeyor when he was the last man. Arsenal should have also had a penalty. In the game against us Kuyt held back Mikel so that he couldn't make the challenge which would have prevented your goal (clearly shown on SKY sports). Against Villa the free kick that gave you your winning goal was a joke. Since then we have had the almost weelky Carragher pulling players down and getting away with it. The thing is Liverpool expect to get all the decisions their way. You just have to listen to the crowd who howl with disgust at the most obvious of free kicks given against their team. Chelsea didn't get a free kick for 20 minutes against Liverpool in the league match this year and that isn't because there weren't any fouls. When Alonso finally came in from behind and committed a bad foul which the referee couldn't avoid giving the crowd howled with derision. Talk about putting pressure on referees.

"You just have to listen to the crowd who howl with disgust at the most obvious of free kicks given against their team." -

GR-09 wrote:
The free kick at Villa was harsh but a foul nevertheless- Im more than happy to give you a copy of the game if you want to see for yourself. Petrov just blocks Gerrard.... its hard for me to explain the obvious.

jdg loves st. nicholas wrote:

Next 3 league fixtures for Spurs:

H v Citeh
A v Pompey
A v Arsenal

theflyingfrenchman wrote:Well what a poor perrformance. Michalik was dreadful as was Meité, and Speed was invisible. Diouf was poor as well. However had ANelka scored, the game would have been different I feel.

And that was never a pen. Crouch took a dive, the snide c**t.

Tweesus of Nazareth wrote:

theflyingfrenchman wrote:Well what a poor perrformance. Michalik was dreadful as was Meité, and Speed was invisible. Diouf was poor as well. However had ANelka scored, the game would have been different I feel.

And that was never a pen. Crouch took a dive, the snide c**t.

How do you see your chances of staying up FF?

GR-09 wrote:I did say a point at best we could have done with - but there was a strong case for all 3 points as Chelsea rarely got forward and we were in a a strong position - and up until that point we were the closest team to scoring.

And when theres a case for all 3 points, we;re talking about a place in next season's Champions League.

GR-09 wrote:Im sure theres more to it than that- on the free kick

GR-09 wrote:but like i said, theres been far more decisions that went your way that season - that game where im struggling to remember- which caused an uproar in liverpool - where we had "3" legit pens turned down - if thats not clear ref bias towards Chelsea, i dont know what is...

GR-09 wrote:And the 05 CL semi - Uncle Romans 6 minutes added time.. which nearly gave Chelsea more time to equalise - nearly cost us a place in the finals again.

GR-09 wrote:And Cech should have been sent off for his tackle on Baros in the same game - and a penalty awarded. The ref came out the next day and said he did Chelsea a massive favour.

GR-09 wrote:Jose always put pressure on referees - whichs why referees choked in Chelsea games - that John Terry "Cech-esque" save springs to mind - dont think he even got booked. - if thats not "preferential treatment" i dont know what is..

ballackthechristmasfatty wrote:

Tweesus of Nazareth wrote:

theflyingfrenchman wrote:Well what a poor perrformance. Michalik was dreadful as was Meité, and Speed was invisible. Diouf was poor as well. However had ANelka scored, the game would have been different I feel.

And that was never a pen. Crouch took a dive, the snide c**t.

How do you see your chances of staying up FF?

on the television or some screen like everyone else, ye fucking idiot

ballackthechristmasfatty wrote:

Tweesus of Nazareth wrote:

theflyingfrenchman wrote:Well what a poor perrformance. Michalik was dreadful as was Meité, and Speed was invisible. Diouf was poor as well. However had ANelka scored, the game would have been different I feel.

And that was never a pen. Crouch took a dive, the snide c**t.

How do you see your chances of staying up FF?

on the television or some screen like everyone else, ye fucking idiot

GR-09 wrote:Maybe if Chelsea players didnt harass the referee at every opportunity, then they would start getting their decisions their way

shazlx-mas wrote:

Luis wrote:

shazlx-mas wrote:

Luis wrote:United are going to get done if we play like that

Lets see Liverpool try play like that vs Anderson and Hargreaves. I see is as a one way game if Gerrard plays against those two.

Anderson really doesn't scare me, as long as Carragher, Agger, Gerrard, Kewell and Torres start we can beat anyone and will beat United

Anderson should, he's better than any of your midfielders. Rio will handle Torres, no problem but without Rooney it could be a 0-0.

El Gaffer wrote:Hehe - quie funny wummery on here - I hope Phil Dowd has a restless nights sleep.

Oh Lordy It's Glenn Hysén wrote:It just shows the pathetic agendas of many of the posters on here when they can try to turn a 4-0 win into a negative.

S4P wrote:

GR-09 wrote:I did say a point at best we could have done with - but there was a strong case for all 3 points as Chelsea rarely got forward and we were in a a strong position - and up until that point we were the closest team to scoring.

And when theres a case for all 3 points, we;re talking about a place in next season's Champions League.

A point at best would not have been enough for the CL. 3 points yes, but you can't say you lost 4th place on a match which happened in October/November.

GR-09 wrote:Im sure theres more to it than that- on the free kick

Watch it again mate, I promise you it was a terrible decision.

GR-09 wrote:but like i said, theres been far more decisions that went your way that season - that game where im struggling to remember- which caused an uproar in liverpool - where we had "3" legit pens turned down - if thats not clear ref bias towards Chelsea, i dont know what is...

I can't remember these legit pens so I won't comment. All I'll say is that if they were at Anfield, with 40,000 scousers screaming at the ref, he would have given at least 1 if they were as legit as you say.

GR-09 wrote:And the 05 CL semi - Uncle Romans 6 minutes added time.. which nearly gave Chelsea more time to equalise - nearly cost us a place in the finals again.

6 minutes was the allocated time. If your players hadn't been time-wasting in the last 20 minutes there wouldn't have been so much added time would there?

GR-09 wrote:And Cech should have been sent off for his tackle on Baros in the same game - and a penalty awarded. The ref came out the next day and said he did Chelsea a massive favour.

Ref played advantage. Had he sent Cech off, he could not possibly have given the goal. Cudicini is much better at saving penalties and in case you haven't noticed from our wins against you and West Ham we're often a better team when we go down to 10 men early (FFS it took a world class Barcelona side nearly 50 minutes to score after Del Horno's dismissal). You would not have won any easier had Cech been sent off.

GR-09 wrote:Jose always put pressure on referees - whichs why referees choked in Chelsea games - that John Terry "Cech-esque" save springs to mind - dont think he even got booked. - if thats not "preferential treatment" i dont know what is..

And you don't think Rafa had any influence on the ref being banned for a week following the Pool-Chels game? You don't think Jamie Carragher has made several "Cech-esque" saves this season, last season and the season before last, yet always gets away with it?

S4P wrote:

GR-09 wrote:Maybe if Chelsea players didnt harass the referee at every opportunity, then they would start getting their decisions their way

This completely contradicts your opinion on Jose/Chelsea and "preferential treatment".

Pierre Littbarski wrote:

El Gaffer wrote:Hehe - quie funny wummery on here - I hope Phil Dowd has a restless nights sleep.

Why ?

kas wrote:Anyone got a link to the goals/controversial moments in the Spurs-Birmingham match?

kas wrote:Anyone got a link to the goals/controversial moments in the Spurs-Birmingham match?

kas wrote:Just saw the highlights. Terry and Mikel should have been off.