Premier League 23rd-25th February Discussion Thread

Kimbo wrote:

St. Eduardo wrote:
@Kimbo - you're a fine one to talk about tediousness. Everyone got bored of your grumpy northerner persona about a year back yet you insist on hanging around, despite announcing your departure. You really think that was a fascinating episode for all and sundry?

I'm wondering how many more angles you can try and insult me with, you've attacked my manhood - didn't work, my favourite sport - didn't work, and now my popularity(on a forum ffs, who cares) - which doesn't work, and is a bit rich coming from who i would guess is one of the least popular posters on the board and yet somehow knows what "everyone" is thinking. It's pathetic and, as i've said, tedious, move on to someone else saints, i'm not the type to be hurt by comments from a faceless nobody on a football forum.

I didn't attack your favourite sport, I pointed out the hypocrisy of someone like you talking about violence when you're all in favour of it as long as it isn't called 'football'...

Btw, me leaving is irrelevant, it was a dispute that is now over and is ancient history. I thought i handled it well and made my point without filling the board with racism or porn.

You handled it well? What, by making a massive fuss over nothing and arrogantly threatening to leave to try to force the mods hands, as if they cared whether or not you post here?

Terrific. I'll stick to porn and racism, thanks.

The Voice of Reason wrote:

Kimbo wrote:

St. Eduardo wrote:
@Kimbo - you're a fine one to talk about tediousness. Everyone got bored of your grumpy northerner persona about a year back yet you insist on hanging around, despite announcing your departure. You really think that was a fascinating episode for all and sundry?

I'm wondering how many more angles you can try and insult me with, you've attacked my manhood - didn't work, my favourite sport - didn't work, and now my popularity(on a forum ffs, who cares) - which doesn't work, and is a bit rich coming from who i would guess is one of the least popular posters on the board and yet somehow knows what "everyone" is thinking. It's pathetic and, as i've said, tedious, move on to someone else saints, i'm not the type to be hurt by comments from a faceless nobody on a football forum.

I didn't attack your favourite sport, I pointed out the hypocrisy of someone like you talking about violence when you're all in favour of it as long as it isn't called 'football'...

Btw, me leaving is irrelevant, it was a dispute that is now over and is ancient history. I thought i handled it well and made my point without filling the board with racism or porn.

You handled it well? What, by making a massive fuss over nothing and arrogantly threatening to leave to try to force the mods hands, as if they cared whether or not you post here?

Terrific. I'll stick to porn and racism, thanks.

I made a thread, that isn't a massive fuss. You're turning up old ground here for the sake of it, it was ages ago and the problem i had no longer exists.

I never want to see someone seriously hurt like Eduardo was, be it on the pitch or in the boxing ring, so there was no hypocrisy there.

Kimbo wrote:
I made a thread, that isn't a massive fuss. You're turning up old ground here for the sake of it, it was ages ago and the problem i had no longer exists.

'For the sake of it' - you are clueless.

I never want to see someone seriously hurt like Eduardo was, be it on the pitch or in the boxing ring, so there was no hypocrisy there.

Yet you support a 'sport' where the objective is to beat the opponent in the head so hard they cannot stand up?

Again, clueless. Violence against another human is violence against another human, even if you dress it up with golden belts, massive shorts, Cr@p entry music and a guy overemphasising every vowel.

The Voice of Reason wrote:

Kimbo wrote:
I made a thread, that isn't a massive fuss. You're turning up old ground here for the sake of it, it was ages ago and the problem i had no longer exists.

'For the sake of it' - you are clueless.

I'm right.

I never want to see someone seriously hurt like Eduardo was, be it on the pitch or in the boxing ring, so there was no hypocrisy there.

Yet you support a 'sport' where the objective is to beat the opponent in the head so hard they cannot stand up?

Again, clueless. Violence against another human is violence against another human, even if you dress it up with golden belts, massive shorts, Cr@p entry music and a guy overemphasising every vowel.

The objective is to hit and not get hit actually, not necessarily hurt your opponent, and certainly not to seriously hurt them.

Kimbo wrote:

The Voice of Reason wrote:

Kimbo wrote:
I made a thread, that isn't a massive fuss. You're turning up old ground here for the sake of it, it was ages ago and the problem i had no longer exists.

'For the sake of it' - you are clueless.

I'm right.

What you said was, literally, meaningless. It therefore cannot be 'right'.

I never want to see someone seriously hurt like Eduardo was, be it on the pitch or in the boxing ring, so there was no hypocrisy there.

Yet you support a 'sport' where the objective is to beat the opponent in the head so hard they cannot stand up?

Again, clueless. Violence against another human is violence against another human, even if you dress it up with golden belts, massive shorts, Cr@p entry music and a guy overemphasising every vowel.

The objective is to hit and not get hit actually, not necessarily hurt your opponent, and certainly not to seriously hurt them.

Where's the line? You punch someone in the head until they don't get up - sounds pretty 'serious' to me...

Hopkins said just last week he is going to kill calzaghe kimmy

COTR wrote:Hopkins said just last week he is going to kill calzaghe kimmy

So either it's immature macho bluster, or boxing involves murderous intent on the part of its participants.

Either way, Kimmy is a twat.

COTR wrote:Hopkins said just last week he is going to kill calzaghe kimmy

Mike Tyson once said he'd eat Lennox Lewis' kids, but as far as I'm aware, they're still around

but half an ear isnt t/s.

He enjoyed eating that

Saints, being knocked out is the equivalent of a dead led, you're fine after an hour or 2. And yes, i was right, my little spat with the mods is irrelevant and was dealt with in 1 thread.

COTR wrote:Hopkins said just last week he is going to kill calzaghe kimmy

He's a blowhard and he still thinks he's in prison. What he will do is run around the ring trying to avoid getting into a fight. Stick some money on Calzaghe coater, this one is NAILED on.

Kimbo wrote:Saints, being knocked out is the equivalent of a dead led, you're fine after an hour or 2.

Sure you are, because y'know, it's not as though they ever have physios or doctors examining them when they are knocked out, and there's never any concern over the health of boxers.

And yes, i was right, my little spat with the mods is irrelevant and was dealt with in 1 thread.

As is abundantly clear, I was not disputing you only posted one thread on your dispute with the mods. So you're either wholly dishonest in ignoring what I did dispute, or you are so stupid that you couldn't even identify it from my post.

COTR wrote:Hopkins said just last week he is going to kill calzaghe kimmy

He's a blowhard and he still thinks he's in prison. What he will do is run around the ring trying to avoid getting into a fight. Stick some money on Calzaghe coater, this one is NAILED on.

And you idolise these people...

The Voice of Reason wrote:
Again, clueless. Violence against another human is violence against another human, even if you dress it up with golden belts, massive shorts, Cr@p entry music and a guy overemphasising every vowel.

does it annoy you that the Auto-Censorship Robot not only puts an @ in but also unnecessarily CAPITALISES the c? it drives me to distraction.

The Voice of Reason wrote:

Kimbo wrote:Saints, being knocked out is the equivalent of a dead led, you're fine after an hour or 2.

Sure you are, because y'know, it's not as though they ever have physios or doctors examining them when they are knocked out, and there's never any concern over the health of boxers.

Ofcourse, it's better to be safe than sorry. How many times does it result in serious injury? It's rare and is always a shame to see.

As is abundantly clear, I was not disputing you only posted one thread on your dispute with the mods. So you're either wholly dishonest in ignoring what I did dispute, or you are so stupid that you couldn't even identify it from my post.

No, as i made abundantly clear, i'm disputing your claim that me saying that my dispute with the mods is irrelevant, is meaning less. How can that be meaningless? What i'm saying is right and clear. Feel free to prove me wring by telling me how it is relevant.

And you idolise these people...

I don't think one person can be described as "these people", very few make those sort of comments. And no i don't idolise Bernard Hopkins, i think people like him are bad for the sport.


This is really boring btw, i don't know how you can have these pointless arguments every day. But each to their own.

debaser wrote:

The Voice of Reason wrote:
Again, clueless. Violence against another human is violence against another human, even if you dress it up with golden belts, massive shorts, Cr@p entry music and a guy overemphasising every vowel.

does it annoy you that the Auto-Censorship Robot not only puts an @ in but also unnecessarily CAPITALISES the c? it drives me to distraction.

these Auto-Censorship Robots are right fucking niggers IMO, it's a fucking disgrace that you can't say Cr@p but you can say jizzy niggers, shitty knickers and wog blockers.

you can say quim too, if you like

Vidal Sassoon wrote:you can say quim too, if you like

quims

Vidal Sassoon wrote:you can say quim too, if you like

Thanks for the permission.

I can even say Quimbo, should the mood so take me...

debaser wrote:

The Voice of Reason wrote:
Again, clueless. Violence against another human is violence against another human, even if you dress it up with golden belts, massive shorts, Cr@p entry music and a guy overemphasising every vowel.

does it annoy you that the Auto-Censorship Robot not only puts an @ in but also unnecessarily CAPITALISES the c? it drives me to distraction.

Blame that on ballack's poor grammar...speaking of which, where is our admin ballack?

Subs: Isaksson, Corluka, Elano, Nery Castillo, Caicedo

Subs: Wessels, Valente, Fernandes, Johnson, Anichebe

Everton should have been given a penalty for handball.

Attack of the Yak. 1-0
Desaeved in terms of chances but ManC are dominating. Poor defending by Richards and Dunne (and Ball)

MOTM so far is Fernandes (ManC) - owning the midfield.

Lescott makes it 0-2 with a header.

jeepers. be a v good win for everton this would.

Sheffield gunner wrote:Lescott makes it 0-2 with a header.

Dunne owned.

debaser wrote:jeepers. be a v good win for everton this would.

For sure. Everton look very strong, especially since they are doing so well in europe at the same time. Liverpool really cannot afford to slip up again because Everton look like they can go the distance.

L r d wrote:

debaser wrote:jeepers. be a v good win for everton this would.

For sure. Everton look very strong, especially since they are doing so well in europe at the same time. Liverpool really cannot afford to slip up again because Everton look like they can go the distance.

even without Fernandes and Arteta.

they've held their form very well. still, they have a hard run-in. as well as playing quite a few of the top 8, they have fixtures like these 2 away trips after uefa games, where they could drop points:


Thursday, 06 March 2008
UEFA Cup
Fiorentina v Everton, Last 16, L1, 19:00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, 09 March 2008
Barclays Premier League
Sunderland v Everton, 15:00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, 13 March 2008
UEFA Cup
Everton v Fiorentina, Last 16, L2, 19:00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, 16 March 2008
Barclays Premier League
Fulham v Everton, 13:30

Richards handles in the box again and gets away with it. He should have conceded two penalties tonight.

Sheffield gunner wrote:Richards handles in the box again and gets away with it. He should have conceded two penalties tonight.

The new Carragher after he was the new John Terry. Another thing in common - all overrated.

Have Everton been the better team, really disappointed in Man City thought they had the momentum.