rate all UK-TEAMS in order?

engalnd
irland
scotland
......

rate the UK teams


Is Irland the second best after england?

Northern Ireland?? second?

.. Republic of Ireland are not part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland...

scotland easily second

england
scotland
ireland
wales

really, who cares

rate all TEAMS there please from there moment players and squads

deisler, how would koln do in the prem?
first?
second?














































































































































































































im being sarcasting

you're being sarcasting? How can you be sarcasting punty??

shit
well i was being spitefull
while i was eating casting sugar?

1. England
2. Scotland
3. Wales
4. Northern Ireland

Scotland>>>>>>>>Ireland

to close to call IMO

wales are better than scotland...much better

1)ingerland
2)wales
3)jocks
4)northern ireland

italian_hammer(DEANO!) wrote:wales are better than scotland...much better

1)ingerland
2)wales
3)jocks
4)northern ireland

without Giggs they look piss poor

poiuy1 wrote:

italian_hammer(DEANO!) wrote:wales are better than scotland...much better

1)ingerland
2)wales
3)jocks
4)northern ireland

without Giggs they look piss poor

Incorrect - though Giggs is the key player, so he'll obviously be missed. Without Gabbidon though... they're a joke.

I'm going to have to disagree - I think Scotland are far better than Wales, at least since Smith took over.

Wales, incidentally, are holding the Czech's 0-0 at half time and have had easily the best of the play the last 15 minutes. Nice pace to the game aswell. Giggs and Bellamy are a constant threat.

1: England
2: Wales
3: Scotland
4: Northern Ireland

There's no way Wales are better than Scotland now. Where did this come from? Since Smith took over Scotland have improved greatly. Wales have no depth to their squad. Scotland have lots of young talent coming through finally.

Johnny_thunde_R wrote:There's no way Wales are better than Scotland now. Where did this come from? Since Smith took over Scotland have improved greatly. Wales have no depth to their squad. Scotland have lots of young talent coming through finally.

scotland will be very dangerous in their group... hartley, mc'fadden, boyd and miller all very exciting players to add to all the other solid players fletcher, ferguson, quashie, mc cann, mc cullough etc... scotland could be a surprise package

Johnny_thunde_R wrote:There's no way Wales are better than Scotland now. Where did this come from? Since Smith took over Scotland have improved greatly. Wales have no depth to their squad. Scotland have lots of young talent coming through finally.

Why have the scots improved so greatly under smith exactly - I don't keep up with scottish football, but hasn't he just beaten Bulgaria B and the Faroe's comprehensively - is that all?

Wales just lost a game they should have won away to the Czech's. Now personally, I find that just as impressive as humiliating the Faroe Islands.

The Scots still don't have any players that come close to the quality of Bellamy and Giggs (and arguably Gabbidon), regardless.

Being part Scot, I'm happy with the change of fortune, and I believe Scotland are second to England now. I'm not much of a Walter Smith fan however, as he shows too much Old Firm & English bias when picking his players. He doesn't blood in enough youngsters either (and there are some talented youngsters in Scottish football).

If I had my way, the likes of Quashie, Weir, Pressley, Daily, Ferguson, Mcullouch, Teale, wouldn't be in the side. Not a huge fan of Miller either, but he probably merits his place in the squad.

If Ireland are included, I'd say it would be pretty tight. But to be honest, any of the home nations are capable of beating each other (as NI showed against England) though there's no doubting England are better than the rest.

i still think Wales are better than scotland from what ive seen.

People that don't follow Scottish football don't realise that there is a lot of young talent. Maloney, Burke, Brown, Thompson, Naismith etc are all very talented players. To be honest I wouldn't put the likes of Maloney & Burke too far behind Bellamy.

zander diamond?

Do we really need such a thread?

It's more or less obvious where each of the British teams stand in the rankings.

diamond, is'nt as good as mcgready

or kris boyd

kris boyd is a striker though who is about 26/27?

diamond is a centre back who is about 21

where is kevin mcnaughton these days?

Between Scotland and Wales it would be very close.

Thought both from what I saw (a half each) played very well today.

Scotland may edge a game, mainly due to there midfield which works very well - Quashie, Ferguson and Fletcher.

Wales do have better individuals though in Giggs and Bellamy.

Isn't Diamond a defender? I haven't seen/heard much of him to be honest. I think he plays for Aberdeen.

Boyd is a goal scoring machine, he offers little else other than that though. He's like an Inzaghi. Though I do like him, and would have him in the team. McGeady should really be playing for Scotland, but no matter, as Maloney and Burke/Brown play similar positions.

yeah he plays for aberdeen as a CB and is one of the best young talents to come out of scotland apparently

Don't know about that. If you ask most people who the top young talents are, most people would say Maloney, Brown, Thompson, Burke & Naismith. Though CB's never get the acclaim I guess.

Fletcher who made the UEFA U19's team of the tournament is a very good prospect as well. But until Walter Smith shows some ambition and starts blooding them in, their 'potential' is rather pointless. Today was the perfect op to try some of them, but he bottled it.

Gordon>Robinson as well.

italian_hammer(DEANO!) wrote:yeah he plays for aberdeen as a CB and is one of the best young talents to come out of scotland apparently

nah he's not as good as the rest of the youngsters....

another good one is riordan