England's Goalkeeper

The Easter Bunny wrote:Why do we need to take 3 keepers? 2 is more than enough.

No it isn't. What if one gets injured and then one gets sent off in a match? you need three.

@ kimmy and lulu

Harper is a god solid keeper and I take Kimmy's point that if you're mentioning Foster, then you can probably mention anyone else in all honesty. Foster is complete and utter shite.

Carson is better than Foster. That's how bad Foster is.

It should be Hart, James and then one of Green or Robinson that go to the world cup. I'm pretty sure that's what Capello has in mind too. The issue for me is whether we opt to play James as a first choice or Hart.

I think it's compulsory to take three keepers anyway isn't it? Otherwise lots of teams probably would take two if they had a defender they thought they could trust as an emergency keeper (as Neil Warnock used to do with Jagielka for instance).

i think hans jörg butt is better than any english keeper

Have another guess

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/low/football/teams/b/birmingham_city/8502628.stm

Tweesus wrote:

The Easter Bunny wrote:Why do we need to take 3 keepers? 2 is more than enough.

No it isn't. What if one gets injured and then one gets sent off in a match? you need three.

How many times has this happened for the NT though?