Rape the Relegated

worms. wrote:

S4P wrote:Anyone who knows anything about football knows that N'gog is the better player of the 2.

Another spectacular fail for you worms

N'gog - 33 apps, 8 goals (in the Championship)
Ba - 43 apps, 19 goals

Luis wrote:Really poor selection this year which highlights how rubbish the teams at the bottom have been.

The only one I'd sign is Remy as a replacement for Downing but I'm not overly fussed.

James McCarthy is good. and Kone probably should've been in Glenn's team, had a good season. Them 2 plus Maloney, Remy, Alex McCarthy and maybe McManaman I'd expect to interest PL clubs.

Most of QPR squad will be tainted by how bad their season went & Reading don't have many standout players, basically have a Championship level team. Wigan the ones who might be scavenged.

Luis wrote:Really poor selection this year which highlights how rubbish the teams at the bottom have been.

The only one I'd sign is Remy as a replacement for Downing but I'm not overly fussed.

both the McCarthy brothers would get into our 18, James McCarthy would make Lucas surplus to requirements, Alex McCarthy seems to be the Shay Given-esq one man defence that a shambles like ours requires.

Rafael Glenítez wrote:

Luis wrote:Really poor selection this year which highlights how rubbish the teams at the bottom have been.

The only one I'd sign is Remy as a replacement for Downing but I'm not overly fussed.

both the McCarthy brothers would get into our 18, James McCarthy would make Lucas surplus to requirements, Alex McCarthy seems to be the Shay Given-esq one man defence that a shambles like ours requires.

Really? I've had enough of average midfielders like Charlie Adam and Jay Spearing for one decade. If we're going to sign a midfielder than he has to be a super sexy player, not some James McLean hero figure.

James McCarthy is better than any of our current midfielders.

He's better than Gerrard?

Gerrard is 33. He's missed half of the last two seasons through injury and he's off again for surgery in the summer. He's had 17 new heads and 14 new handles - he's not the same player he was, albeit he has been excellent this season.

Point is: James McCarthy would start for us. He'd start for any of the teams above us too.

Speaking of being raped by the relegated.. Remy has been arrested for raping.

I would maybe take Danny Guthrie back, the rest can FUCK OFF!!!

christmasborocooper wrote:Speaking of being raped by the relegated.. Remy has been arrested for raping.

cultural differences

I think I'm agreeing with debaser. Kone, Maloney, whichever one of Mcarthy and Mcarthur is the good one.. Taarabt I can see someone taking a gamble on. Le fondre might get someone looking at him I guess... A newly promoted team.

Callum McManaman too. Could see Lambert going for him.

Oh yeah forgot him. Rodgers might want him too. Or Stoke given his thuggery.

Hoilett
Kone
McCarthy

McManaman is exciting now but he'll inevitably fall off in a year or two. He's 90% pace and confidence.

Walcott is 99% pace and confidence and he's doing fine.

Walcott is also fairly bright and can finish, if McManaman were 17 then perhaps he'd be worth a punt but he's not half the player Walcott was at 17, and he's already 22.

McManaman is better technically than Walcott is currently, let alone at 17. He relies on his pace, but works more effectively then Walcott does in tight situations.

Maybe he will fall off. But he has good technique, is young, fast and English. Definitely worth a punt.

I love how people are McManaman connoisseurs after seeing him play about 5 games.

I love how you love Walcott.

Jonah and the Whale wrote:I love how you love Walcott.

What's not to love? Fast, 16 league goals, plenty of assists, dangerous crosser of the ball, tracks back to help the team and always looks lively. We have Stuart Downing starting for us - I'm sorry if I would rather have Walcott on my team.

Luis wrote:I love how people are McManaman connoisseurs after seeing him play about 5 games.

How many games does it take to work out if someone has a good first touch? 10, 20?

Hlebagone wrote:

Luis wrote:I love how people are McManaman connoisseurs after seeing him play about 5 games.

How many games does it take to work out if someone has a good first touch? 10, 20?

Well people thought James McLean was the next Gerrard at the end of last season, then look what happened.

He looks promising but better technically than Walcott? Get out of here.

Luis wrote:

Jonah and the Whale wrote:I love how you love Walcott.

What's not to love? Fast, 16 league goals, plenty of assists, dangerous crosser of the ball, tracks back to help the team and always looks lively. We have Stuart Downing starting for us - I'm sorry if I would rather have Walcott on my team.

Walcott does not always look lively. Just trust me on that one. This is the first season of his career where he's consistently delivered and even then, he's been hot and cold.

He's an adequate crosser of the ball.

He's lazy on defence for the most part.

He is better than Downing

Hlebagone wrote:

Luis wrote:

Jonah and the Whale wrote:I love how you love Walcott.

What's not to love? Fast, 16 league goals, plenty of assists, dangerous crosser of the ball, tracks back to help the team and always looks lively. We have Stuart Downing starting for us - I'm sorry if I would rather have Walcott on my team.

Walcott does not always look lively. Just trust me on that one. This is the first season of his career where he's consistently delivered and even then, he's been hot and cold.

He's an adequate crosser of the ball.

He's lazy on defence for the most part.

He is better than Downing

No wonder he wanted to leave if all Arsenal fans don't appreciate him like you.

I'd happily spend 20 million on Walcott and I think he'd pay off every bit of that price.

The amount of praise you give him is disproportionate to his actual ability. If I didn't know any better I would call you a PHAGGOT. No offense.

Luis wrote:

Hlebagone wrote:

Luis wrote:I love how people are McManaman connoisseurs after seeing him play about 5 games.

How many games does it take to work out if someone has a good first touch? 10, 20?

Well people thought James McLean was the next Gerrard at the end of last season, then look what happened.

He looks promising but better technically than Walcott? Get out of here.

FWIW I always thought Mclean was too one dimensional.

Yeah. I'm gonna stand by it. Walcott is good when he's through on goal - composed. And when he has space to run into, as defenders shit themselves.

Our right side, of Sagna and Walcott though is possibly the least dynamic side that Wenger has ever fielded. Unless we're playing on the break, it's an absolute dead end.

Luis wrote:

Hlebagone wrote:

Luis wrote:

Jonah and the Whale wrote:I love how you love Walcott.

What's not to love? Fast, 16 league goals, plenty of assists, dangerous crosser of the ball, tracks back to help the team and always looks lively. We have Stuart Downing starting for us - I'm sorry if I would rather have Walcott on my team.

Walcott does not always look lively. Just trust me on that one. This is the first season of his career where he's consistently delivered and even then, he's been hot and cold.

He's an adequate crosser of the ball.

He's lazy on defence for the most part.

He is better than Downing

No wonder he wanted to leave if all Arsenal fans don't appreciate him like you.

I'd happily spend 20 million on Walcott and I think he'd pay off every bit of that price.

You are a genuine retard. Or just a very good troll.

All Arsenal Fans hate Walcott because he's not as good as Thierry Henry.

Throughout Wanger's early French revolution the fans were crying out for him to bring through some English talent instead of French. So they now have Gibbs, Wilshere and Walcott (and Ramsay, Jenkinson, Ox-Cha, Frimpong) and now they're moaning that the team isn't as good as it was, Wenger out boo boo boo.

c**ts

Roman Aglennovich wrote:All Arsenal Fans hate Walcott because he's not as good as Thierry Henry.

Throughout Wanger's early French revolution the fans were crying out for him to bring through some English talent instead of French. So they now have Gibbs, Wilshere and Walcott (and Ramsay, Jenkinson, Ox-Cha, Frimpong) and now they're moaning that the team isn't as good as it was, Wenger out boo boo boo.

c**ts

Sweeping generalisations, revisionist history, hypocrisy. c**t?