Ricardo Wetzel wrote:
After the 1-0 we walked too muxch backwards and were too easy! That's dangerous. We have to stay awake.!
At least you do, while the rest is asleep!
Probably your strategy all along...
Ricardo Wetzel wrote:
After the 1-0 we walked too muxch backwards and were too easy! That's dangerous. We have to stay awake.!
Gio did it once (but was offside), there was also one overlap on the right flank, but it was done... by Van Bommel, again (he did it too in previous games).The Professor wrote:So Brazil are not the most negative top side at the WC, that award goes to Oranje. How many times have u seen Van Der Wiel or Bronckhorst overlap? Added to that you've got the defensive forward Kuyt and 2 holding midfielders who hardly venture forward. Van Marwijk is wasting RVP, there's no one for him to combine with, why not play Affellay(who combines well with RVP) instead of the defensive striker on the left? wasting RVP
blutgraetsche wrote:No he isn't. Just because a player is shit on Pro Evolution Soccer it doesn't make him Kaka IRL.
Kuyt has his purpose.
Jaime wrote:TM wrote:Kuyt is so shit.
This is sooooooooooooooooooo much worse than saying Drenthe is shit.
COME ON TM!
Fey wrote:Holland are unwatcheble, worse then Germany and Italy combined ffs. If it continues like this Slovakia should be allowed to go through. Im gonna have some ben and jerrys.
The Professor wrote:So Brazil are not the most negative top side at the WC, that award goes to Oranje. How many times have u seen Van Der Wiel or Bronckhorst overlap?
El Fresa wrote:Good game
stinger wrote:Gio did it once (but was offside), there was also one overlap on the right flank, but it was done... by Van Bommel, again (he did it too in previous games).The Professor wrote:So Brazil are not the most negative top side at the WC, that award goes to Oranje. How many times have u seen Van Der Wiel or Bronckhorst overlap? Added to that you've got the defensive forward Kuyt and 2 holding midfielders who hardly venture forward. Van Marwijk is wasting RVP, there's no one for him to combine with, why not play Affellay(who combines well with RVP) instead of the defensive striker on the left? wasting RVP
Cking2010 wrote:stinger wrote:Gio did it once (but was offside), there was also one overlap on the right flank, but it was done... by Van Bommel, again (he did it too in previous games).The Professor wrote:So Brazil are not the most negative top side at the WC, that award goes to Oranje. How many times have u seen Van Der Wiel or Bronckhorst overlap? Added to that you've got the defensive forward Kuyt and 2 holding midfielders who hardly venture forward. Van Marwijk is wasting RVP, there's no one for him to combine with, why not play Affellay(who combines well with RVP) instead of the defensive striker on the left? wasting RVP
What do you mean by saying they overlaped?
L r dd wrote:Cking2010 wrote:stinger wrote:Gio did it once (but was offside), there was also one overlap on the right flank, but it was done... by Van Bommel, again (he did it too in previous games).The Professor wrote:So Brazil are not the most negative top side at the WC, that award goes to Oranje. How many times have u seen Van Der Wiel or Bronckhorst overlap? Added to that you've got the defensive forward Kuyt and 2 holding midfielders who hardly venture forward. Van Marwijk is wasting RVP, there's no one for him to combine with, why not play Affellay(who combines well with RVP) instead of the defensive striker on the left? wasting RVP
What do you mean by saying they overlaped?
Are you ever gonna learn English ffs?
|
|