2012-2013 Europa League Final - Chelsea FC v SL Benfica

I admit that Anne Frank isn't a specialist subject of mine, unlike the Holohoax itself. I haven't bothered to research Anne Frank because even if the story is true what does it prove? Absolutely nothing in grand scheme of things.

EMP wrote:

Disco Benny wrote:Congrats S4P.

Not that this makes me happy mind. How a club who fucks up in the CL can go on and win the Europa is a nasty brown shit stain on UEFA's credibility.

Yes, to pre empt the obvious question: of course I'm bitter. I knew this was going to happen the minute the c**ts dropped down into the competition.

Is this the first time that a CL drop-out has won the Europa League, or its predecessor since CL dropouts were accepted? If not, stop picking on Chelsea, especially as Benfica was also a CL dropout.

Err, I would have and continue to say the same each time a drop out club wins the UL.

The fact that Chelsea are just that little bit harder to congratulate - after all, they've spent considerably more money than Benfica and the like to win a competition that they weren't all that massively bothered about - isn't in question.

And I agree with RP - as much as Arsenal are an extremely annoying bunch of c**ts, when it comes to who is the least likeable, Chelsea wins every time.

Jonah and the Whale wrote:I admit that Anne Frank isn't a specialist subject of mine, unlike the Holohoax itself. I haven't bothered to research Anne Frank because even if the story is true what does it prove? Absolutely nothing in grand scheme of things.

Then why don't you shut your mouth up until you know for sure what you are saying. I think you write some good stuff at times but try and cut back from the need for attention.

I actually agree with you for once Brian, I am an instinctive poster. That's why every now and then I talk nonsense because I don't think before typing. But I have tried to cut down on this.

Disco Benny wrote:

EMP wrote:

Disco Benny wrote:Congrats S4P.

Not that this makes me happy mind. How a club who fucks up in the CL can go on and win the Europa is a nasty brown shit stain on UEFA's credibility.

Yes, to pre empt the obvious question: of course I'm bitter. I knew this was going to happen the minute the c**ts dropped down into the competition.

Is this the first time that a CL drop-out has won the Europa League, or its predecessor since CL dropouts were accepted? If not, stop picking on Chelsea, especially as Benfica was also a CL dropout.

Err, I would have and continue to say the same each time a drop out club wins the UL.

The fact that Chelsea are just that little bit harder to congratulate - after all, they've spent considerably more money than Benfica and the like to win a competition that they weren't all that massively bothered about - isn't in question.

And I agree with RP - as much as Arsenal are an extremely annoying bunch of c**ts, when it comes to who is the least likeable, Chelsea wins every time.

Getting better, but your Spurs membership is at stake. You must prove your Arsenal-hating credentials or it will lead to further misery next year. The Custodians of the Curse have spoken. Try this: "And I grudgingly agree with a minute portion of anything RP has to say even if he is obviously right, because he shows such poor judgement as to be an Arsenal fan - as much as Arsenal are an exceptionally annoying bunch of c**ts, when it comes to Chelsea I don't like them much either."

Brian2468 wrote:

Jonah and the Whale wrote:I admit that Anne Frank isn't a specialist subject of mine, unlike the Holohoax itself. I haven't bothered to research Anne Frank because even if the story is true what does it prove? Absolutely nothing in grand scheme of things.

Then why don't you shut your mouth up until you know for sure what you are saying. I think you write some good stuff at times but try and cut back from the need for attention.

Good grief Worms. You proclaimed the Anne Frank story a hoax, gloating about your so-called proof that it showed it false, only to be embarrassed by the proof that it was not false. Did you even know that the Anne Frank Museum allowed the diary to be scientifically tested and those tests proved that it was genuine? Anne Frank had plans to write a novel based on her experiences after the war. The diary has been published in 67 languages. It has sold millions of copies and both it and the Museum keep the facts of living in hiding under a regime of vile persecution alive for generations fortunate enough not to have to live those experiences. The diary is very powerful as is her story and it dates back to the Franks fleeing persecution in their native Frankfurt. It covers how the life of a child turned from hope to despair and chronicles an important part of Dutch history, as is the story of Dutch resistance to the Nazis. In the grand scheme of things her story proves rather a lot. It proves what Jewish people had to do to survive in an occupied country. It shows what life is like in abnormal circumstances. It shows how a people (note the use of the word a) were dehumanised first and subjected to vile treatment and then murdered in gas chambers or by gross neglect. In short Worms, it proves a hell of a lot to anyone but those who refuse to see.
You also prove a lot Worms. While people like you exist there will always be a need to remember the Holocaust and Anne Frank with contemporary relevance rather than the purely historic thing I for one wish it would become sooner rather than later.

Most of the people who died in the concentration camps of National Socialist territory died of Typhus. That's what the Zyklon B was for, the Zyklon B was the treatment used on the prisoners for Typhus.The prisoners heads where shaved because of lice in the camps, ask yourself if the Germans wanted to exterminate the Jews then why would they bother with treating them for their lice and Typhus ? Why would they feed them for months on months, years on years ? Why would they put on entertainment shows on for them inside the camps ?Later on in the war a lot of people did in fact starve to death, but that was simply because the Germans barely had any food left to feed even their soldiers by that point. There was nothing they could do, all I know is that the mainstream account of the so called Holocaust has more holes in it than Swiss cheese.

I can't remember the exact number, but there is no proof that any more than approximately 1 million Jews at the hands of the National Socialists in Germany and Poland. The vast majority of them died because of Typhus and starvation which was forced upon many ordinary white Germans as well towards the end of the war(Not just the Jewish prisoners).

And I am 100% certain there where no gas chambers used to kill one person by the National Socialists, unlike Anne Frank I have actually researched this in depth. Before you say, I've been to Auschwitz and seen the gas chambers nobody is saying you are lying as such. But I am saying that you have been misled, I have seen documentrys and read articles explaining how the buildings that where supposedly used as Gas Chambers have clearly been tampered with, there is plenty of evidence that this is the case. There is simply no way that some of those buildings could have been used as Gas Chambers, even in theory never mind in practice. David Cole is just one Jewish person who has exposed this lie, he made a great documentary which is now on youtube proving without doubt there where no Gas Chambers. I could have mentioned dozens of people who have proven this great lie but I thought David Cole was an interesting case as he was Jewish himself and he mysteriously disappeared after he start making some publicity.

I stand by my point that the story of Anne Frank is irrelevant sensationalist crap, even if it's true.There have been millions of worse of children than her in history, many with a greater tale to tell.I admit Jews where treated bad by the National Socialists but their was reasons for this, they weren't just picked on for nothing as the Western Propaganda machine will have you believe, that is simply a ridiculous idea if you think about it, that the National Socialists would treat them badly for absolutely nothing. Do your own research on it and form a real opinion. And even though they where treated bad it was nowhere near as bad as it is made out by the VICTORS of the war, the Germans certainly didn't commit genocide, of that I am certain. There is no proof whatsoever of any attempt of genocide. Go and look up the word genocide and what it means in case you have forgotten.

Again, the Holohoax is the only event in history enforced by Law. There is a reason for this, the truth can stand up to scrutiny. Lies can not. When there is so many holes in a theory, debate on it must be silenced or the lie will eventually be exposed.

I don't care if you read this or not EMP as your opinion and thoughts are meaningless to me anyway but I know there will be other people who will read this and may feel the urge to check out some of the stuff I have mentioned, don't take my word for it do your own research, if even one person researches this stuff for themselves because of reading this it will have been worth it.

So the Germans only directly executed a million Jews, and were directly responsible for the death of the remaining number?

That's not a hoax. If you create the conditions for people to die, and then they die, that's still a genocide.

It like me locking you up in a cell, not providing you with any food, and then maintaining that I didn't kill you, you starved to death.

Hlebagone wrote:So the Nazis only directly executed a million Jews, and were directly responsible for the death of the remaining number?

That's not a hoax. If you create the conditions for people to die, and then they die, that's still a genocide.

It like me locking you up in a cell, not providing you with any food, and then maintaining that I didn't kill you, you starved to death.

@Hlebagone: There are some who will never see the glaringly obvious. Anne Frank died of typhus in a concentration camp. In the warped world of Holocaust deniers that doesn't count as part of the genocide. How and why typhus, malnutrition, etc. thrived there is irrelevant to them.

Genocide is genocide regardless of the methods used to kill.

The mystical 6 million number is a lie.
The Gas Chambers are a lie.
The supposed attempt of genocide by the National Socialists is a lie.

Etc.

Germans starved too, plenty of people in Central Europe starved during World War 2. Plenty of people died of Typhus. It's bound to happen in the most bloody war in history.

"It like me locking you up in a cell, not providing you with any food, and then maintaining that I didn't kill you, you starved to death."

But they had no food to feed them with, they where not put in concentration camps to be murdered. They where there for the sole purpose of separating them from the main population and to eventually deport them.The plan was to eventually deport them all to Israel, some Jews had already been deported there , then Britain declared war on Germany for taking back some of it's rightful territory from Poland which as a result of the Versailles Treaty had effectively been stolen from them.

EMP wrote:

Hlebagone wrote:So the Nazis only directly executed a million Jews, and were directly responsible for the death of the remaining number?

That's not a hoax. If you create the conditions for people to die, and then they die, that's still a genocide.

It like me locking you up in a cell, not providing you with any food, and then maintaining that I didn't kill you, you starved to death.

@Hlebagone: There are some who will never see the glaringly obvious. Anne Frank died of typhus in a concentration camp. In the warped world of Holocaust deniers that doesn't count as part of the genocide. How and why typhus, malnutrition, etc. thrived there is irrelevant to them.

Genocide is genocide regardless of the methods used to kill.

Look at all that proof. Oh wait, there isn't any. Again. Just like last time.

Until you post some actual evidence I will just replay with this:

Big Willy wrote:Yet another big smack in the face to all the Holocaust propagandists whose only arguments consists of insults, legislation, dogma and lies.

EMP wrote:

Hlebagone wrote:So the Nazis only directly executed a million Jews, and were directly responsible for the death of the remaining number?

That's not a hoax. If you create the conditions for people to die, and then they die, that's still a genocide.

It like me locking you up in a cell, not providing you with any food, and then maintaining that I didn't kill you, you starved to death.

@Hlebagone: There are some who will never see the glaringly obvious. Anne Frank died of typhus in a concentration camp. In the warped world of Holocaust deniers that doesn't count as part of the genocide. How and why typhus, malnutrition, etc. thrived there is irrelevant to them.

Genocide is genocide regardless of the methods used to kill.

Oh, and by the way as a "journalist", you may want to learn the definition of genocide:


"The deliberate killing of a large group of people, esp. those of a particular ethnic group or nation."

Which part of deliberate don't you understand you fat piece of trash ? How thick are you ? I even put the word deliberate in bold for you. Stop trying to change the definition of words you worthless slimy piece of shit. You are a snake. Your little tricks will continue to be pointed out by me on this board.

Hlebagone wrote:So the Germans only directly executed a million Jews, and were directly responsible for the death of the remaining number?

That's not a hoax. If you create the conditions for people to die, and then they die, that's still a genocide.

It like me locking you up in a cell, not providing you with any food, and then maintaining that I didn't kill you, you starved to death.

Executed ? Do you not have a dictionary either ? Do you want me to find you the definition of the word executed ? Here's a tip, use google.

Read the description of genocide too, while you're at it.

That's enough ownage by me in one day, I will now have a well earned break from typing and let EMP lick his wounds.

This has gone off topic.

I hate Chelsea and the Nazis.

What has Anne Frank to do with Chelsea-Benfica?

Oh wait...the final was in amsterdam>>>>JEWS>>>>Anne frank. Logical.

Did you read the guestbook EMP. Apperantly Justin Bieber wrote in it, that if she would be alive today, she would have been a Belieber. What a nice chap.

Fey wrote:What has Anne Frank to do with Chelsea-Benfica?

Oh wait...the final was in amsterdam>>>>JEWS>>>>Anne frank. Logical.

Did you read the guestbook EMP. Apperantly Justin Bieber wrote in it, that if she would be alive today, she would have been a Belieber. What a nice chap.

Yes Fey, I read the guestbook. Bieber made a right hash of that.

By the way Fey, you exhibit the tell-tale signs of a self-hater who protests too much. No doubt your ancestors were misplaced during the Jewish diaspora.

Me, too much protesting, against what? Please explain.

Fey wrote:Me, too much protesting, against what? Please explain.

Against Jews. The classic tactic of a self-hater who is denying his Jewish roots in order to avoid suspicion of your real origins Fey ben Gurion. The self-hater hopes to blend in and thinks that by attacking Jews, nobody will suspect your Jewish origins.

The word you are looking for is Crypto-Jew.

This thread has proved Godwin's Law

EMP wrote:

Fey wrote:Me, too much protesting, against what? Please explain.

Against Jews. The classic tactic of a self-hater who is denying his Jewish roots in order to avoid suspicion of your real origins Fey ben Gurion. The self-hater hopes to blend in and thinks that by attacking Jews, nobody will suspect your Jewish origins.

So you are calling me a jew? Why? Do you think im cheap, well do you? Im NOT Jewish, I traced back 5 generations of Fey's and they were all Aryan without a single drop of jew blood in them. So stop accussing me! Besides would a true jew eat Bitterballen?

As for Anne Frank, who was an illegal immigrant in Holland btw, was family of Hans Frank!

Murray wrote:This thread has proved Godwin's Law

True. It always happens. Imagine the CL thread for Bayern v Dortmund. I think it will happen on the first page already.

Wait, I thought Fey was black. Or maybe he just likes black men.

Fey wrote:

EMP wrote:

Fey wrote:Me, too much protesting, against what? Please explain.

Against Jews. The classic tactic of a self-hater who is denying his Jewish roots in order to avoid suspicion of your real origins Fey ben Gurion. The self-hater hopes to blend in and thinks that by attacking Jews, nobody will suspect your Jewish origins.

So you are calling me a jew? Why? Do you think im cheap, well do you? Im NOT Jewish, I traced back 5 generations of Fey's and they were all Aryan without a single drop of jew blood in them. So stop accussing me! Besides would a true jew eat Bitterballen?

As for Anne Frank, who was an illegal immigrant in Holland btw, was family of Hans Frank!

See what I mean about protesting too much. Hans Frank was a Jew then. You're not a cheapskate Fey. The undercover ones would certainly eat Bitterballen and I notice that you left out the 6th generation of Feys. I wonder why?

Even if I knew how to there would be no point in me tracing back my family tree. I know I am 100% Aryan.