by L r d Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:36 pm
kas wrote:lrd and AGooner:
The Chelsea midfield may indeed have the ability to put a player through, but it doesn't mean they always do. Look at Shevchenko's goal against Levski in the CL game last Wednesday...Lampard had an easy shot and one that he would have normally taken. Instead he passed it, and what happened?
And Crespo did score for Chelsea, but it wasn't instant either. He took a while to settle in. Plus his long range strikes (like against Wigan in the first game of the season last season) went in, whereas Shevchenko comes up against great saves.
Your other points make much more sense, it's simply a case of him needing time to adapt to a faster pace, and knowing what runs to make.
Yeah against levski a team who not very good, and the defending was awful, left sheva wide open.
The fact is he has been a major flop, his game has not been good, i dont understand the need to blame others for it. His touch etc is not the fault of others.
It's like er you like a player a certain type of player, how bad he can be there is excuses, not having kaka and deco behind him is an excuse i mean wtf. Then the other type of player, can score 100 goals but still can do right.
Sheva has been poor all round. Lampard shoots a lot, but chelsea have the ball a lot, lampard in previous season, set many goals up for the strikers. Ballack also can do the same. I reckon most teams would like essien ballack and lampard in there midfield, as would most strikers.
Sheva more than likely will come good, but as of yet been horrible. Drogba has scored a few great goals, but not all of them were like that at all, and he also is a great a partner to have, sets up and creates many chances, so sheva has him doing that for him, and still he has been poor.