Mourinho to leave at the end of the season?

the topic of today it seems, all over the papers about Mourinho having his last season at Chelsea this season, apparantly he's 'fallen out' with certain board membors *cough* Peter Kenyon.

There's been criticism of his big name signings and the overall impression is that it's job done now for Jose and it's time for a fresh change.

what do you make of it?

I think he was always going to leave this summer, Inter will be his destination

Great. A more arrogant Hector Cuper.

Would Personally keep Mancio.

AZ are also looking after him....

Well... Guus.... it seems to be you get another double management role... Russia and Chelski....

Roman adores you and you know that...!

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:AZ is also lookiung after him....

Well... Guus.... it seems to be you get another double management role... Russia and Chelski....

Roman adores you and you know that...!

I dont know why chelsea would have Hiddink over Mourinho to be honest, Jose's got a far better record at club level by a considerable amount

can't see Hiddink working, would he be allowed to revamp the squad to suit his style

Luis wrote:

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:AZ is also lookiung after him....

Well... Guus.... it seems to be you get another double management role... Russia and Chelski....

Roman adores you and you know that...!

I dont know why chelsea would have Hiddink over Mourinho to be honest, Jose's got a far better record at club level by a considerable amount

How can you say that...? Hiddink won more league championships, more national cup, he also won the Champions league, he won the world Cup, he almost had success everywhere he went to....

poiuy1 wrote:can't see Hiddink working, would he be allowed to revamp the squad to suit his style

Hiddink has NO style he makes the best team from the players he has...

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:

poiuy1 wrote:can't see Hiddink working, would he be allowed to revamp the squad to suit his style

Hiddink has NO style he makes the best team from the players he has...

That's very true. Gus Hiddink maximises the strengths of what he already has.

South Koreans = High Tempo sharp nippy football.

Holland - lots of creativity & technique.

PSV - Strong counter-attacking.

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:

Luis wrote:

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:AZ is also lookiung after him....

Well... Guus.... it seems to be you get another double management role... Russia and Chelski....

Roman adores you and you know that...!

I dont know why chelsea would have Hiddink over Mourinho to be honest, Jose's got a far better record at club level by a considerable amount

How can you say that...? Hiddink won more league championships, more national cup, he also won the Champions league, he won the world Cup, he almost had success everywhere he went to....

Jose

With F.C. Porto:
Portuguese Championships (2): 2002/03; 2003/04
SuperCup Cândido de Oliveira: 2003
Cup of Portugal: 2002/03
UEFA Cup: 2002/03
UEFA Champions League: 2003/04

With Chelsea FC:
FA Premier League (2): 2004/05; 2005/06
Football League Cup: 2004/05
FA Community Shield: 2005


Hiddink

1986/87 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV Eindhoven.
1987/88 - European Cup: Champion with PSV.
1987/88 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
1987/88 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
1988/89 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
1998/89 - UEFA Champion's League: Champion with PSV.
1988/89 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
1989/90 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
1998 - Intercontinental Cup (football): Champion with Real Madrid.
2002/03 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
2004/05 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
2004/05 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
2005/06 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.


which is the more impressive?

i meant more would he be allowed to drop players like Ballack Lampard Sheva etc.

if not then essentially wouldn't they be playing the same football

Luis wrote:

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:

Luis wrote:

RickyWishYouAJollyNewYear wrote:AZ is also lookiung after him....

Well... Guus.... it seems to be you get another double management role... Russia and Chelski....

Roman adores you and you know that...!

I dont know why chelsea would have Hiddink over Mourinho to be honest, Jose's got a far better record at club level by a considerable amount

How can you say that...? Hiddink won more league championships, more national cup, he also won the Champions league, he won the world Cup, he almost had success everywhere he went to....

Jose

With F.C. Porto:
Portuguese Championships (2): 2002/03; 2003/04
SuperCup Cândido de Oliveira: 2003
Cup of Portugal: 2002/03
UEFA Cup: 2002/03
UEFA Champions League: 2003/04

With Chelsea FC:
FA Premier League (2): 2004/05; 2005/06
Football League Cup: 2004/05
FA Community Shield: 2005


Hiddink

1986/87 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV Eindhoven.
1987/88 - European Cup: Champion with PSV.
1987/88 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
1987/88 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
1988/89 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
1998/89 - UEFA Champion's League: Champion with PSV.
1988/89 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
1989/90 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
1998 - Intercontinental Cup (football): Champion with Real Madrid.
2002/03 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
2004/05 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.
2004/05 - KNVB Cup: Champion with PSV.
2005/06 - Eredivisie: Champion with PSV.


which is the more impressive?

Hiddinks list is larger plus the fact he spent less money than Mourinho... So I can't see why Mourinho would be more impressive... Because he had some success within the English borders...?

Mourinho is not even allowed to clean hiddinks boots yet...!

Hiddinks had far more time than Jose though

I don't want to see him at Inter... or anywhere near Italy, he can take teh Portugal job.
There was an article in our local newspaper today criticising(whatever) him and how he fails to get the best out of Ballack and Sheva, because he doesn't know how to play them in the rolls they are used too.

Super Milanista! wrote:I don't want to see him at Inter... or anywhere near Italy, he can take teh Portugal job.
There was an article in our local newspaper today criticising(whatever) him and how he fails to get the best out of Ballack and Sheva, because he doesn't know how to play them in the rolls they are used too.

is someone perhaps a little angry at Jose stealing Sheva from the mighty Milan?

Yeah i never thought Jose would be off. But all the signs are there. He does not get on with Kenyon. The troubles with Sheva, and Sheva being Romans friend, and really Romans buy. The Mikel troubles, the gallas thing, the board not being happy with him etc. I wouldn't mind him at Man Utd, so if he can wait 3-4 years then great.

Probably Inter i guess, why not ac milan though?

L r d wrote:Yeah i never thought Jose would be off. But all the signs are there. He does not get on with Kenyon. The troubles with Sheva, and Sheva being Romans friend, and really Romans buy. The Mikel troubles, the gallas thing, the board not being happy with him etc. I wouldn't mind him at Man Utd, so if he can wait 3-4 years then great.

Probably Inter i guess, why not ac milan though?

Did Jose not say though that if Abromavich was to buy a player without Jose's go ahead then he would walk out?

no, I don't care about sheva, he made his chioce it was wrong and now he should leave to go back to dynamo kyiv so he can save himself, before he lands up in a worse position.
I just can't stand the guy Lu or practically anyone in Chelsea besides a handfull of players.

L r d wrote:Yeah i never thought Jose would be off. But all the signs are there. He does not get on with Kenyon. The troubles with Sheva, and Sheva being Romans friend, and really Romans buy. The Mikel troubles, the gallas thing, the board not being happy with him etc. I wouldn't mind him at Man Utd, so if he can wait 3-4 years then great.

Probably Inter i guess, why not ac milan though?

NOOOOOO! Never

Super Milanista! wrote:no, I don't care about sheva, he made his chioce it was wrong and now he should leave to go back to dynamo kyiv so he can save himself, before he lands up in a worse position.
I just can't stand the guy Lu or practically anyone in Chelsea besides a handfull of players.

ye most of the world feels like this!, no but I will give Chelsea credit for winning back to back titles, only because they didn't bring in 'big stars' to do so, now that they've brought in big shots I have no sympathy for them

Luis wrote:

L r d wrote:Yeah i never thought Jose would be off. But all the signs are there. He does not get on with Kenyon. The troubles with Sheva, and Sheva being Romans friend, and really Romans buy. The Mikel troubles, the gallas thing, the board not being happy with him etc. I wouldn't mind him at Man Utd, so if he can wait 3-4 years then great.

Probably Inter i guess, why not ac milan though?

Did Jose not say though that if Abromavich was to buy a player without Jose's go ahead then he would walk out?

Roman met sheva numerous times, asked him to come numerous times. Obviously jose agreed to get sheva, but really roman pulled the strings. just like the gerrard deal, kenyon came up to jose and said gerrard might be available would you want him, he said yes. It was not jose going up to kenyon. also apparently lampard says he plays for roman not jose. and ballack moaning about the style of play.

I loved Pirlo's "As for the ENGLISH STUDENT"

Mourinho has too big an ego to let Roman dictate to him who the players in the squad should be be.

Luis wrote:Hiddinks had far more time than Jose though

And Hiddink had succes with national teams as well.
Hiddink would be the perfect replacement for Chelsea.

L r d wrote:

Luis wrote:

L r d wrote:Yeah i never thought Jose would be off. But all the signs are there. He does not get on with Kenyon. The troubles with Sheva, and Sheva being Romans friend, and really Romans buy. The Mikel troubles, the gallas thing, the board not being happy with him etc. I wouldn't mind him at Man Utd, so if he can wait 3-4 years then great.

Probably Inter i guess, why not ac milan though?

Did Jose not say though that if Abromavich was to buy a player without Jose's go ahead then he would walk out?

Roman met sheva numerous times, asked him to come numerous times. Obviously jose agreed to get sheva, but really roman pulled the strings. just like the gerrard deal, kenyon came up to jose and said gerrard might be available would you want him, he said yes. It was not jose going up to kenyon. also apparently lampard says he plays for roman not jose. and ballack moaning about the style of play.

I generally don't believe this is true, I rate Lampard as a professional, I think the players play for one man and that is Jose, sure Roman has his say i'm sure but at the end of the day if you were to ask any Chelsea player what they think of Mourinho i'm sure they'd praise him immensely.

TeamSpirit wrote:I loved Pirlo's "As for the ENGLISH STUDENT"

it was very funny. Though I really pity Sheva now and I feel for him. He must go back to Kiev

Since 1888 wrote:

Luis wrote:Hiddinks had far more time than Jose though

And Hiddink had succes with national teams as well.
Hiddink would be the perfect replacement for Chelsea.

I was talking about club managerial records

Super Milanista! wrote:

TeamSpirit wrote:I loved Pirlo's "As for the ENGLISH STUDENT"

it was very funny. Though I really pity Sheva now and I feel for him. He must go back to Kiev

plz don't.. this man earns 130 grand a week... save your pity for other people plz

If Mourinho was to leave Chelsea at the seasons end, probably most Chelsea fans will be happy, because it'll mean that they'd won the champons league.

"Tuffy" Monag wrote:If Mourinho was to leave Chelsea at the seasons end, probably most Chelsea fans will be happy, because it'll mean that they'd won the champons league.

I get the feeling, it's leave or be told to leave

TeamSpirit™ wrote:Great. A more arrogant Hector Cuper.

Would Personally keep Mancio.

Mancio could be the new Samp manager....was always linked with coming back to the club he loves!