Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+5
COTR
Glenarch of the Glen
Tweesus
"Tuffy" Monag
Parks lives
9 posters

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:44 am

    Consortium pulls out of Reds bid







    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal _41255731_liverpool_203
    Dubai International Capital has ended its interest in taking over Liverpool.
    The announcement follows the failure of the club's board to formally accept DIC's bid in the wake of a second offer from American George Gillett.
    DIC claimed the offer had been accepted in principle by majority shareholder David Moores but it was unable to make a formal offer to shareholders.
    Chief executive Sameer Al Ansari said the DIC group was disappointed but added: "We won't overpay for assets."
    DIC had been their most likely suitor and entered into discussions with the club late last year with Sheikh Mohammed the central figure in the investment arm of Dubai's government.
    The deal would have valued the club at £450m but the Dubai group has decided to withdraw following the board's decision to allow more time to consider the Gillett bid.




    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal O

    As fans, we hope that the new owners would share the same vision as we had for Liverpool



    DIC chief executive Sameer Al Ansari


    That offer would give shareholders more for their holdings and Moores, who owns 51.6% of the club, would get £8m more from the Gillett deal.
    Gillett has already carried out due diligence - the process of investigation by potential investors -so the way is now open for him to make his offer for the club.
    Sameer Al Ansari added: "We are very disappointed to be making this announcement. DIC are a serious investor with considerable resources at our disposal.
    "At the same time, we are supporters of the game and of the club. Liverpool's investment requirements have been well publicised and, after a huge amount of work, we proposed a deal that would provide the club with the funds it needs, both on and off the pitch.
    "We were also prepared to offer shareholders a significant premium on the market price of the shares.
    "As businessmen, we move on. As fans, we hope that the new owners would share the same vision as we had for LFC and, of course, in realising the new stadium that is so badly needed to ensure the club can continue to compete at the highest level in the Premiership and Europe."




    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal O

    Mohammed is a very angry man and that is why he has pulled out



    BBC sports editor Mihir Bose


    BBC sports editor Mihir Bose told BBC Radio Five Live that he believed Sheikh Mohammed was angry with Liverpool's courting of tycoon Gillett who is expected to make a revised takeover bid.
    Bose said: "Mohammed is a very angry man and that is why he has pulled out. He was given assurances by Liverpool that they would go with them but the talk of other offers has unsettled him and he has pulled out.
    "DIC saw this as business enterprise but Gillett has told Liverpool that they are a sports franchise and they know how to run sports operations.
    "With Gillett it won't be like an Roman Abramovich deep pockets scenario."
    Liverpool, who also need finance to fund their proposed new stadium £180m on Stanley Park, have been linked with a number of takeovers in recent years.
    Former Thailand prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra made a high-profile bid in 2004 and another American billionaire, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, also met with club officials.


    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    No David Villa and Alves then I suppose.
    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:55 am

    Good article on the matter......


    The takeover of Liverpool FC has climaxed with a late withdrawal from DIC that has left a bitter taste in the mouths of all Liverpool fans.

    DIC Heads were set to takeover the club this week promising to splash out on new players and so the news comes as a sucker blow to Liverpool fans who favoured DIC and who had warmed to the idea of having the backing of DIC.

    The saga ends Liverpool’s love affair with DIC whose interest in the club had meant that DIC was on the lips of every Liverpool fan for the past few months. But now they will have to do what they do best and put DIC behind them, and hope that George Gillett is the best a man can get.
    avatar
    "Tuffy" Monag


    Number of posts : 405
    Age : 32
    Supports : SLB
    Registration date : 2007-01-03

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by "Tuffy" Monag Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:00 am

    WOW, English wit at it's best. And they say comedy is dead since the demise of Arther Askey and Benny Hill.
    Tweesus
    Tweesus


    Number of posts : 34851
    Age : 41
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Tweesus Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:08 am

    It seems bizarre how the deal fell through. Flirting with too many suitors I suppose, slags.
    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:15 am

    Tweedle wrote:It seems bizarre how the deal fell through. Flirting with too many suitors I suppose, slags.

    They can't even get someone to pay for there services. Razz


    Some Liverpool fans on RAWK were saying they may have to know ground share with Everton if they want to move.
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:54 pm

    Parks lives wrote:
    Tweedle wrote:It seems bizarre how the deal fell through. Flirting with too many suitors I suppose, slags.

    They can't even get someone to pay for there services. Razz


    Some Liverpool fans on RAWK were saying they may have to know ground share with Everton if they want to move.

    Why you're on RAWK I'll never know, but I'll say this anyways. The groundshare thing is a no go. It's quite probably why his first bid was rejected and as part of the second deal he's agreed to underwrite the cost of the new stadium. People seem to be ignoring that fact because they didn't want him to begin with.

    The problem with Gillett is that he's been bankrupt twice (yet he's still a multi-millionaire) and his deal involves taking out a shit load of loans alá Glazer - AS FAR AS WE ARE AWARE. The fact is that no one knows this. Just like no one knows what happened with DIC or why this second bid is so great.

    Ultimately, we're all a bit disappointed because the club has (shot themselves in the foot by) spending the last 2 months talking up the DIC as this business messiah and then decided not to accept it's first bid. The fact that Gillett's people took 3 days to complete Due Dilligence and DIC took close to 2 months shows a bit of a problem with the commitment of the DIC deal. As does the fact that as soon as the board asked for more time to consider the offer - which it needed to do really as it would be unethical just to dismiss a potentially better bid from Gillette out of hand - they fucked off like a spoilt child who hadn't got their way. They're being linked with Newcastle this morning aswell, so they don't seem to be too hung up on it.

    We'll just wait and see what happens. The rumours are that Gillett is interested longer-term and will give us more money to spend. The downside is of course, the bollocks about the ground share - which has been dismissed out of hand - and the fact that we're likely to be borrowing against the value of the club alá Glazer, unless there's some mega rich consortium backing him up like Kia Joorabchin is said to have had.


    Last edited by on Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    Glenarch of the Glen


    Number of posts : 30157
    Age : 38
    Supports : Palestine
    Favourite Player : Hélder Barbosa
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Glenarch of the Glen Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:15 pm

    Parks lives wrote:

    They can't even get someone to pay for there services. Razz

    their
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Guest Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:20 pm

    Parks lives wrote:
    Tweedle wrote:It seems bizarre how the deal fell through. Flirting with too many suitors I suppose, slags.

    They can't even get someone to pay for there services. Razz


    Some Liverpool fans on RAWK were saying they may have to know ground share with Everton if they want to move.

    Now
    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:34 pm

    So no Alves and Villa then?

    What happens to your Emirates stadium as well?
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:39 pm

    Are you 'tarded or something?

    "Why you're on RAWK I'll never know, but I'll say this anyways. The groundshare thing is a no go. It's quite probably why his first bid was rejected and as part of the second deal he's agreed to underwrite the cost of the new stadium. People seem to be ignoring that fact because they didn't want him to begin with."

    And, if the BBC is to be believed:

    "He completed his due diligence programme within three days - after DIC had taken the best part of a month over the same process.

    He happily agreed to personally underwrite the potential ?200m-plus cost of a new stadium without hesitation.

    Was DIC reluctant to underwrite in such a fashion? If it was, it may have suggested to Liverpool a slight dent in their enthusiasm.

    He delivered guarantees on future transfer funds."
    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:53 pm

    He delivered guarantees on future transfer funds."

    How much though?

    The £50 - 60 million you wanted the other day?
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:57 pm

    DIC never delivered guarentees on how much either.

    He knows that for us to be a successful money making venture for him we have to be winning the league and champions league - especially as the league is worth £50m from next year on.

    Anyways, Parry's come out just now with the following and until we know any different it can only be taken on face value:

    "“George Gillett has made it absolutely clear to us he will not be in favour of a groundshare. There will be funding for the new stadium and a proper commitment to investment in the team."
    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:01 pm

    Sounds like the Glazers but this guy has even less cash.
    COTR
    COTR


    Number of posts : 26580
    Age : 40
    Supports : Liverp8-0l
    Favourite Player : Xabier Alonso, Fabio Aurelio, Daniel Agger, Pepe Reina, Alberto Aquilani, Elano, Luis Suarez, Glen Johnson
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by COTR Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:38 pm

    Obispo wrote:Are you 'tarded or something?


    I don't even think this question needed asking obi... the answer has been pretty conclusive for a long time
    avatar
    Luis
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Luis Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:39 pm

    COTR wrote:
    Obispo wrote:Are you 'tarded or something?


    I don't even think this question needed asking obi... the answer has been pretty conclusive for a long time

    ok
    fcb
    fcb


    Number of posts : 40471
    Age : 113
    Supports : FC Barcelona
    Registration date : 2006-08-11

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by fcb Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:45 pm

    Rather naive there Obispo...I bet if Gillett was the first one to make a formal offer and knew there was no one else interested, he too would have taken his time over due diligence. When you're trying to "haul ass" and get a bid in on time before the board meets to decide on DIC, then anything can get done in 3 days.
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:52 pm

    kas wrote:Rather naive there Obispo...I bet if Gillett was the first one to make a formal offer and knew there was no one else interested, he too would have taken his time over due diligence. When you're trying to "haul ass" and get a bid in on time before the board meets to decide on DIC, then anything can get done in 3 days.

    Gillett had already made a previous offer before the DIC got their due-dilligence. They had 6 weeks of exclusivity with regards to the clubs books and despite constant whispers of "it'll be done soon" etc, nothing came to fruitian. Gillett had prepared his deal beforehand the 2nd time around and took 3 days to complete Due Dilligence.

    Something is not right with one side of that.

    Anyways, here's something interesting I spotted on RAWK:

    Strong murmerings in the Newcastle business community suggest that DIC were dithering with us because they had to resolve issues surrounding a potential conflict of interest.

    The Belgravia Group were (until a few weeks ago) in serious negotiations to take over Newcastle United. As we know, at the same time DIC have been well along the takeover route with us. It seems that it was only at a late stage that a problem was spotted - the same ultimate controlling party cannot own more than one club in the same league. I'm told that Belgravia's financial muscle ultimately comes from Sheik Mhaktoum - and therein lay the problem.

    So they took time to:

    (a) Look into the legal ins and outs of whether they could get away with doing both deals and stay within the rules; and

    (b) Decide which deal to pursue and which to abandon - whilst trying not to upset too many people in the process.

    Belgravia Group pulled out of the Newcastle deal a few weeks ago - suggesting that the powers that be in the UAE decided (understandably) ours was the basket in which to place their eggs.

    But this does shed some light on the protracted due diligence. Nothing to do with us or our affairs - just our suitors dragging their heals and deciding whether they really wanted us.

    Personally, knowing this information enables me to feel a bit more sympathy for the fact that Parry/Moores have stuck up for themselves when offered an ultimatum. DIC were basically saying "How dare you talk to someone else", when in fact they themselves had dragged the whole process out because THEY (indirectly) were talking to someone else the whole time.

    Seems to me that DIC are corporate bully boys. Not suprising too - for they are as big and as serious as they come in the business world. Comparing them to us is like comparing a family corner shop to Walmart. They are used to bullying small businesses like us (and make no mistake, we are a small business by most standards), and the habit clearly dies hard. They have made no allowance for the unique culture and sensitivity of the industry they were looking to invest in. This was their mistake - no-one elses's.

    In the circumstances, I don't think our board could have reacted any other way with the best interests of the club in mind.

    And if DIC's beligerent approach to negotiations displayed such a lack of respect, what could we have expected from their approach to running the club...?


    So the DIC look at the cheaper option with a huge local fan base and a stadium already in place. Seems to fit their whole 7 year plan - which despite their denial, Parry/Moores have suggested was part of the problem - down to the ground.
    fcb
    fcb


    Number of posts : 40471
    Age : 113
    Supports : FC Barcelona
    Registration date : 2006-08-11

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by fcb Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:58 pm

    Interesting. Obviously I'm not sure what exactly will happen, but I'll certainly welcome it if they now take over Newcastle. Anything to get Shepherd out...though it would be funny to see if they claim to be lifelong fans of Newcastle as well Laugh

    (I think not, because I know Samir Al Ansari genuinely liked Liverpool)
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:00 pm

    kas wrote:Interesting. Obviously I'm not sure what exactly will happen, but I'll certainly welcome it if they now take over Newcastle. Anything to get Shepherd out...though it would be funny to see if they claim to be lifelong fans of Newcastle as well Laugh

    (I think not, because I know Samir Al Ansari genuinely liked Liverpool)

    Ansari was a fan, but he was the only one. Maktoum, who essentially funds the whole venture, was not.
    fcb
    fcb


    Number of posts : 40471
    Age : 113
    Supports : FC Barcelona
    Registration date : 2006-08-11

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by fcb Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:05 pm

    Well, Sheikh Mohammed is a very distant head of DIC. He's the ruler of Dubai, and the Dubai government has a 50% stake in DIC, which is directly run by Ansari...so you can see it's a bit of a stretch.
    It wouldn't matter who he supported, because he would have practically no involvement once the deal went through. Ansari would be the one dealing with Moores/Parry, etc. (not really sure of Liverpool's hierarchy).
    D-agger
    D-agger


    Number of posts : 186
    Age : 36
    Supports : liverpool
    Favourite Player : Gerrard,Torres,Kaka
    Registration date : 2006-11-21

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by D-agger Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:23 pm

    I found this comment from 606 a bit appealing.

    It seems that the Liverpool board are amateurs in business. If they knew how people in the Middle East do business, they would know that pondering for too long is an insult. The offer was solid, the intentions were long term and the fact that they were fans of the club and sport portrayed a feeling of purpose and excitement. It is such a shame we have lost this deal.
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:26 pm

    A twist to the Gillet deal?

    Dallas Morning News

    Hicks to buy into Liverpool

    11:08 AM CST on Thursday, February 1, 2007

    By EVAN GRANT / The Dallas Morning News
    egrant@dallasnews.com

    In what may well set a precedent for North American sports franchise owners, Rangers and Stars boss Tom Hicks is entering into an agreement with Montreal Canadiens owner George Gillett Jr. to purchase one of the most storied teams in the British Premiership soccer league.

    According to a source, Hicks has agreed to go half-and-half with Gillett on the $450 million purchase of Liverpool Football Club. Hicks' investment will rival the $250 million he paid for the Rangers when he purchased them in 1998. A formal announcement of the deal could be made early next week.

    In a history that dates back to 1892, Liverpool has won 18 league championships and five European Cup. Liverpool, currently in third place in the Premiership standings, last captured the European Cup in 2005.

    Hicks was in the United Kingdom this week and was expected back in the United States late Thursday.

    Hicks and Gillett were together at last week's NHL All-Star Game where, according to a source, the partnership idea picked up steam. Hicks and Gillett have also worked together on the Swift Company executive board.

    It is believed to be, however, the first time two major sports owners have gone into partnership on another franchise.

    Gillett's bid to take over the club has been well-documented. He was the underdog to Dubai International Capital, but, according to the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph, DIC withdrew its bid on Tuesday.

    "We are very disappointed," Sameer Al Ansari, executive chairman and chief executive officer of DIC, told the Telegraph. "DIC is a serious investor with considerable resources at its disposal. At the same time, we are supporters – of the game and of the club. We proposed a deal that would provide the club with the funds it needs on and off the pitch."

    "We have a duty as directors to consider a very interesting bid from George Gillett," Liverpool chief executive Rick Parry told the Liverpool Echo.

    "The DIC response to this was to give the club 12 hours to make a decision but the chairman was not prepared to have Liverpool Football Club bullied like that."

    Hicks will join a growing number of U.S. sports owners investing in the British Premiership. Tampa Bay Buccaneers owner Malcolm Glazer purchased Manchester United, the Premiership's version of the New York Yankees. Cleveland Browns owner Randy Lerner invested in the Aston Villa franchise, a lower-echelon Premiership club. Revenues for the upper-level Premiership clubs, including Manchester United, Liverpool and Arsenal all are believed to be in line with those generated by NFL franchises.




    May go some way to explaining how this deal could offer similar financial security to the DIC one.

    Edit: Apparently this bloke used to spend like a fucking nutter before the salary cap era of the NHL. He gave a baseball player a 10 year, $250 contract aswell. Shocked
    avatar
    Parks lives


    Number of posts : 34521
    Age : 43
    Favourite Player : The Ginger One
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Parks lives Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:31 pm

    Are the New York Yankees the biggest name in American baseball then?
    avatar
    L r d
    Guest


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by L r d Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:32 pm

    Parks lives wrote:Are the New York Yankees the biggest name in American baseball then?

    I'd think so. This bloke owns the Dallas Stars in Ice Hokey and the Texas Rangers in baseball. Just reading that he gave one of their baseball players the biggest sports contract in US history at the time.
    forza_rossi
    forza_rossi


    Number of posts : 2563
    Age : 38
    Registration date : 2006-08-07

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by forza_rossi Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:43 pm

    Parks lives wrote:Are the New York Yankees the biggest name in American baseball then?
    Yes indeed they are.
    fcb
    fcb


    Number of posts : 40471
    Age : 113
    Supports : FC Barcelona
    Registration date : 2006-08-11

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by fcb Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:42 pm

    Yeah, the Yankees are the Chelsea of baseball. Everyone hates them (except their fans), and every year they (mostly) reach the playoffs, and their formula is spend spend spend spend spend.
    DD
    DD


    Number of posts : 10721
    Age : 44
    Supports : NEC
    Registration date : 2006-08-07

    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by DD Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:14 pm

    The yankees invented overpaying top players just to stick them on their bench so the opposition can't have them.

    Sponsored content


    DIC pull out of Liverpool deal Empty Re: DIC pull out of Liverpool deal

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 10, 2024 1:33 pm