Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+12
Deluded F*ck™
Machiavel
Since 1888
Kroos
The Pröfessör
blutgraetsche
chrissicross
Dwarf
Deano
toon h
Cesc Soler
None
16 posters

    Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought?

    Poll

    Is Hargreaves Crap?

    [ 9 ]
    Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought? - Page 2 Bar_left28%Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought? - Page 2 Bar_right [28%] 
    [ 23 ]
    Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought? - Page 2 Bar_left72%Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought? - Page 2 Bar_right [72%] 

    Total Votes: 32
    Tweesus
    Tweesus


    Number of posts : 34851
    Age : 41
    Registration date : 2006-08-06

    Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought? - Page 2 Empty Re: Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought?

    Post by Tweesus Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:40 pm

    Frings is better IMO, but at the age of 26 he wasn't as good as Hargreaves is at present IMO - Frings is also quite different to Hargreaves in that he is positional rather than being quick
    chrissicross
    chrissicross


    Number of posts : 6246
    Age : 42
    Supports : Werder Bremen
    Favourite Player : Per Mertesacker, Thomas Müller
    Registration date : 2006-08-10

    Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought? - Page 2 Empty Re: Hargreaves, As Bad As We Thought?

    Post by chrissicross Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:02 pm

    Tweedle wrote:Frings is better IMO, but at the age of 26 he wasn't as good as Hargreaves is at present IMO - Frings is also quite different to Hargreaves in that he is positional rather than being quick
    Agreed. ok

      Current date/time is Sat Nov 02, 2024 1:26 pm