Sheff Utd investigated for illegal clause

Deano - why not read the article and decide for yourself?

Get ready to spend the transfer funds on Tevez on rebuilding your side for the Championship too.

Roger Hunt wrote:Deano - why not read the article and decide for yourself?

Get ready to spend the transfer funds on Tevez on rebuilding your side for the Championship too.

You seriously think they can reinstate a team who have broken the same rule??

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:

Roger Hunt wrote:Deano - why not read the article and decide for yourself?

Get ready to spend the transfer funds on Tevez on rebuilding your side for the Championship too.

You seriously think they can reinstate a team who have broken the same rule??

I say relegate Chelsea due to the bung and put sheffiled united back in

As long as we are supporting them, then yes.

Remember Deano, one rule for the G14, another rule for the rest of you plebs

Roger Hunt wrote:As long as we are supporting them, then yes.

Remember Deano, one rule for the G14, another rule for the rest of you plebs

So you take Mascherano, then back a club who broke the rules too. Interesting...I can see why hate for Liverpool appears frequently...

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:

Roger Hunt wrote:As long as we are supporting them, then yes.

Remember Deano, one rule for the G14, another rule for the rest of you plebs

So you take Mascherano, then back a club who broke the rules too. Interesting...I can see why hate for Liverpool appears frequently...

Jelousy

I am winding you up, Deano, and you are biting big time.

Yes we took Mascherano - why not? but it took us weeks to be sure that the paperwork was all in order before the deal was completed. The FA praised us for the open way we'd dealt with them, I believe.

I would rather have WHU in the Prem than Sheffield, no question. But your attitude is getting tiresome, not to mention your desire to blame Liverpool for everything. The fact is that selling Mascherano helped you guys no end as it avoided further investigation of your initial signing - an no-one else but us was in the market for him. You then hijacked our deal for Lucas Neill. Then when we bid quite legitimately for one of your players you spit the dummy and accuse us of trying to unsettle him.

Be worried Deano. The football authorities always cave into Liverpool. Remember them getting into the CL despite finishing 5th and being allowed to sign Mascherano by ignoring the rule about players only being allowed to play for 2 clubs in a season.

Murray wrote:Be worried Deano. The football authorities always cave into Liverpool. Remember them getting into the CL despite finishing 5th and being allowed to sign Mascherano by ignoring the rule about players only being allowed to play for 2 clubs in a season.

I hope we don't forgive Liverpool for this...

Viva Man United!

Murray wrote:Be worried Deano. The football authorities always cave into Liverpool. Remember them getting into the CL despite finishing 5th and being allowed to sign Mascherano by ignoring the rule about players only being allowed to play for 2 clubs in a season.

Us winning the champions league and finishing 5th only brought to attention the stupidity of not allowing the holders back into the competition, if you have gone all the way and win the cup you should be allowed to defend it whether you finish 5th, 7th or 20th in the league.

And Mascherano was allowed to come because of his relatively little involvment in West Ham and the fact that his career would of been in danger had he stayed at the Hammers.

Luis...your club is trying to relegate my club. That I won't forgive...and I hope everyone at our club won't either.

Yeah but Luis, look how Everton did British football proud when they got into the CL ahead of us

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:Luis...your club is trying to relegate my club. That I won't forgive...and I hope everyone at our club won't either.

Yes that's exactly what the whole of Liverpool are doing, jesus, Parry was asked to the meeting to give his side of the story on the signing of Mascherano, I doubt he went 'I support Sheffield United, I think West Ham should be relegated' of course he fucking didn't, stop trying to create enemies

Luis wrote:

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:Luis...your club is trying to relegate my club. That I won't forgive...and I hope everyone at our club won't either.

Yes that's exactly what the whole of Liverpool are doing, jesus, Parry was asked to the meeting to give his side of the story on the signing of Mascherano, I doubt he went 'I support Sheffield United, I think West Ham should be relegated' of course he fucking didn't, stop trying to create enemies

He is giving evidence on behalf of Sheffield United to help them avoid relegation. How much clearer can it be?

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:

Luis wrote:

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:Luis...your club is trying to relegate my club. That I won't forgive...and I hope everyone at our club won't either.

Yes that's exactly what the whole of Liverpool are doing, jesus, Parry was asked to the meeting to give his side of the story on the signing of Mascherano, I doubt he went 'I support Sheffield United, I think West Ham should be relegated' of course he fucking didn't, stop trying to create enemies

He is giving evidence on behalf of Sheffield United to help them avoid relegation. How much clearer can it be?

What evidence? how could he know how West ham signed Teves? he doesn't have a fucking clue, the media love to spin things Deano, we are a 'mystery club, defending S. United' bollocks, Parry was probably asked to give his view on the saga and gave the for arguement of it for Sheffield United, it's a two way thing, if you ask most Liverpool fans who they would rather see in the Premiership next season it would be West Ham because United have a cuntish manager.

But as a result of Deano's behaviour I am in danger of changing my mind....

Roger Hunt wrote:But as a result of Deano's behaviour I am in danger of changing my mind....

What behaviour

I'm sure if this was your club you wouldn't be in the happiest of moods either. I just would like to know why he is giving evidence on behalf of Sheff Utd.

End of the day I think we have bigger fish to fry then getting a club relegated, it's nothing to do with us, it's between yourselves and Sheffield United, and obviously they wont re-instate Sheffield United, it just wont happen so it;s all a load of bollocks anyway

Ok I apologise...SSN fucked up and said he was giving evidence on behalf of them.

Carlsberg.

The BBC have confirmed Rick Parry has given evidence in favour of Sheff Utd.

Deano - I don't know whether Parry could just choose to not give evidence or not, I don't understand the powers the tribunal has.

But even if he has chosen to give evidence, it doesn't mean that he wants you to be relegated - maybe he just feels he needs to tell the truth. I know plenty of people who I get on with OK but if they were on trial I would give evidence - and I would tell the truth. If it was my best mate I'd lie through my teeth if necessary but that's another story.

I'm not entirely sure...I'm just pissed off that nothing is being done about the c**ts breaking a rule too.

I don't know why Parry is giving evidence in favour of them though...

Well if Parry has been called by Sheffield then you'd assume his evidence was favourable to them.

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:The BBC have confirmed Rick Parry has given evidence in favour of Sheff Utd.

We really want Tevez. Hopefully relegating you will increase our chances

Don't worry though, you won't be relegated...Especially now Sheffield have broken a similar rule themselves.

Lucas Deano Neill wrote:I'm not entirely sure...I'm just pissed off that nothing is being done about the c**ts breaking a rule too.

I don't know why Parry is giving evidence in favour of them though...

From the BBC story:

'Liverpool chief executive Rick Parry appeared at the arbitration tribunal on Monday.
He first drew attention to the rule breaches when Liverpool signed Mascherano from West Ham in the January transfer window.
Questioned as to whether Parry's appearance as a witness was due to Liverpool's signing of Javier Mascherano from West Ham, McCabe added: "Not particularly. Rick is an experienced football guy. He's a good witness."'

So it looks like he's been called because we pointed out the alleged irregularities at the point of signing Mascherano because we wanted to make sure we wouldn't get in trouble later on. Having done that Parry's an obvious person for Sheffield to call as a witness, doesn't necessarily mean he's got a particular wish to see West Ham relegated.

He's clearly been called by Sheffield to tell his part of the story because it's integral to the whole narrative. I doubt he's saying that the Hammers should be relegated and that Sheffield are justified.

16 Premiership clubs backed West Ham when asked by the Premier League and said no further action should be taken.

Sheffield United, Fulham and Wigan were the 3 pushing for more action.

They didn't ask West Ham themselves? Seems a bit harsh.

I thought Parry was called up as he was the guy who help create the Premiership and the laws of the Premier League ?

ballack wrote:They didn't ask West Ham themselves? Seems a bit harsh.