Jaime wrote:
Midget: F*cking hell Arjen, can you believe of all the tulipanes Fatty over here is the one who stays in Madrid?
Robben: Un-f*cking-believable Wes. Oy, KJ - did you hear Rafa is still in Madrid?
The Hunter: I scored more goals than he did in half a season - and I am more mobile, wtf!
Dirk: Do you smell something?
VDV: Hehehehehe
Jaime wrote:
Midget: F*cking hell Arjen, can you believe of all the tulipanes Fatty over here is the one who stays in Madrid?
Robben: Un-f*cking-believable Wes. Oy, KJ - did you hear Rafa is still in Madrid?
The Hunter: I scored more goals than he did in half a season - and I am more mobile, wtf!
Dirk: Do you smell something?
VDV: Hehehehehe
Is Mijatovic sill in charge?Jaime wrote:Great! Ribery wants to come in January. Another winter signing that won't be eligible for the CL.
Or Valdano has some plan for Ribery (or Romania and Serbia) to do during this international break? 
L r dd wrote:We'll see im really not buying into this that those 3 look superb at all. Robben is very easy to control on the right. On the left a decent team knows how to limit his impact. I think he'd be the ideal super sub but thats it. Gomez despite the usual German protest is a limited player if you can limit 2 of the 3 which i see very possible it's hardly a dangerous front line. We'll see in the cl in a few weeks i guess but im not to impressed at all. Not to mention i think Ribery is overated in the extreme.
King Pipita wrote:I think Robben will show this season that he is every bit as good as Ribery. Ribery has been fantastic but he has also benefited from playing in Germany and he's never played in one of the big three leagues. Robben on the other hand hasn't reached the heights that Ribery has at Bayern but he's come close to that level and done it in England and Spain.
Özil wrote:(the real ronaldo, thats it) but his goalscoring record is better than from rooney and benzemaL r dd wrote:We'll see im really not buying into this that those 3 look superb at all. Robben is very easy to control on the right. On the left a decent team knows how to limit his impact. I think he'd be the ideal super sub but thats it. Gomez despite the usual German protest is a limited player if you can limit 2 of the 3 which i see very possible it's hardly a dangerous front line. We'll see in the cl in a few weeks i guess but im not to impressed at all. Not to mention i think Ribery is overated in the extreme.
So is Kris Boyd's whats your point?
kas wrote:And as if the Barça fans would accept an injury prone ex Real Madrid player
Jaime wrote:Calderón: "El Real Madrid ha fichado tanto porque yo dejé 115 millones de euros"
Torrente wrote:After the way the Ronaldo transfer went, I do believe there was some kind of pre-contract that Calderon arranged for Ronaldo to come this summer. Especially because the club bid 94 million for Ronaldo in one go without even meeting with ManU directives first. I'm sure that with a bit of bargaining that sum could have gone down to 75-80 million, while before announcing his candidacy Florentino was already quoted as saying that Ronaldo was not worth 90 million. (which was the figure that was rumored Madrid would have to pay for Ronaldo)
That being said, there's nothing special about getting a player like Ronaldo if that is the kind of sum you pay. Calderon shouldn't hype himself up as if he's some kind of bargaining genius.
Torrente wrote:After the way the Ronaldo transfer went, I do believe there was some kind of pre-contract that Calderon arranged for Ronaldo to come this summer. Especially because the club bid 94 million for Ronaldo in one go without even meeting with ManU directives first. I'm sure that with a bit of bargaining that sum could have gone down to 75-80 million, while before announcing his candidacy Florentino was already quoted as saying that Ronaldo was not worth 90 million. (which was the figure that was rumored Madrid would have to pay for Ronaldo)
That being said, there's nothing special about getting a player like Ronaldo if that is the kind of sum you pay. Calderon shouldn't hype himself up as if he's some kind of bargaining genius.
I don't blame Perez for the Ronaldo signing. I think most of the facts points to Calderon already having a deal in place. And it was quite a bad deal so Calderon shouldn't parade as if he has done something great. Im not so sure Perez would have signed him at least this summer if this deal wasn't in place. This now forces us to have two players don't quite fit in Pellegrini's tactic. Allthough knowing this Perez should have been pragmatic and consulted Pellegrini with regards to the signing of Kaka aswell but with Perez's ego he wouldn't let tactics get in the way of having a signature signing-elbecko wrote:Torrente wrote:After the way the Ronaldo transfer went, I do believe there was some kind of pre-contract that Calderon arranged for Ronaldo to come this summer. Especially because the club bid 94 million for Ronaldo in one go without even meeting with ManU directives first. I'm sure that with a bit of bargaining that sum could have gone down to 75-80 million, while before announcing his candidacy Florentino was already quoted as saying that Ronaldo was not worth 90 million. (which was the figure that was rumored Madrid would have to pay for Ronaldo)
That being said, there's nothing special about getting a player like Ronaldo if that is the kind of sum you pay. Calderon shouldn't hype himself up as if he's some kind of bargaining genius.
All the world know that Moron over paid for him. The whole episodes leading up to and including the announcement by ManUre agreeing the transfer, suggest to me that there were a lot of efforts made to rescinder the contract he arranged and/or alter the condition at least.
Without that idiot, we'd have had done far better with new signings.
Super Granero wrote:I don't blame Perez for the Ronaldo signing. I think most of the facts points to Calderon already having a deal in place. And it was quite a bad deal so Calderon shouldn't parade as if he has done something great. Im not so sure Perez would have signed him at least this summer if this deal wasn't in place. This now forces us to have two players don't quite fit in Pellegrini's tactic. Allthough knowing this Perez should have been pragmatic and consulted Pellegrini with regards to the signing of Kaka aswell but with Perez's ego he wouldn't let tactics get in the way of having a signature signing-elbecko wrote:Torrente wrote:After the way the Ronaldo transfer went, I do believe there was some kind of pre-contract that Calderon arranged for Ronaldo to come this summer. Especially because the club bid 94 million for Ronaldo in one go without even meeting with ManU directives first. I'm sure that with a bit of bargaining that sum could have gone down to 75-80 million, while before announcing his candidacy Florentino was already quoted as saying that Ronaldo was not worth 90 million. (which was the figure that was rumored Madrid would have to pay for Ronaldo)
That being said, there's nothing special about getting a player like Ronaldo if that is the kind of sum you pay. Calderon shouldn't hype himself up as if he's some kind of bargaining genius.
All the world know that Moron over paid for him. The whole episodes leading up to and including the announcement by ManUre agreeing the transfer, suggest to me that there were a lot of efforts made to rescinder the contract he arranged and/or alter the condition at least.
Without that idiot, we'd have had done far better with new signings.
Perez is that youJaime wrote:Super Granero wrote:I don't blame Perez for the Ronaldo signing. I think most of the facts points to Calderon already having a deal in place. And it was quite a bad deal so Calderon shouldn't parade as if he has done something great. Im not so sure Perez would have signed him at least this summer if this deal wasn't in place. This now forces us to have two players don't quite fit in Pellegrini's tactic. Allthough knowing this Perez should have been pragmatic and consulted Pellegrini with regards to the signing of Kaka aswell but with Perez's ego he wouldn't let tactics get in the way of having a signature signing-elbecko wrote:Torrente wrote:After the way the Ronaldo transfer went, I do believe there was some kind of pre-contract that Calderon arranged for Ronaldo to come this summer. Especially because the club bid 94 million for Ronaldo in one go without even meeting with ManU directives first. I'm sure that with a bit of bargaining that sum could have gone down to 75-80 million, while before announcing his candidacy Florentino was already quoted as saying that Ronaldo was not worth 90 million. (which was the figure that was rumored Madrid would have to pay for Ronaldo)
That being said, there's nothing special about getting a player like Ronaldo if that is the kind of sum you pay. Calderon shouldn't hype himself up as if he's some kind of bargaining genius.
All the world know that Moron over paid for him. The whole episodes leading up to and including the announcement by ManUre agreeing the transfer, suggest to me that there were a lot of efforts made to rescinder the contract he arranged and/or alter the condition at least.
Without that idiot, we'd have had done far better with new signings.
Maybe they don't fit exactly Pellegrini's tactics but you certainly don't hear the man complaining. If Perez wants to bring Kaka I'm sure the manager does not need to be consulted. You can always accommodate a great player.
¿Qué le ha parecido el póster de AS?
Absolutamente fantástico. No imaginé que fuera tan grande. La foto es del día de la presentación en el Bernabéu con las gradas llenas. No he olvidado lo que viví aquella noche. Fue como soñar despierto. Me lo llevaré a mi casa. Me ha gustado mucho. ¡Este póster seguro que me traerá suerte!
Si de niño le dicen que en España un diario iba a hacer un póster gigante con su imagen, ¿qué habría pensado?
¿Un póster gigante por mí? ¿Por qué? Ja, ja. Es un orgullo.
|
|
|
Home
