110% wrote:I think the question we should be asking is:
Was xavi as good as cesc at aged 22?
And the answer would be no. The Xavi hype started the last few years, around the time that Dinho made barcelona successful and messi continued it. Of course it is a team game and he contributes to that, but having the best player in the world doesn't half help. Unfortunately Cesc's doesn't have that luxury at Arsenal, he is their best player by far.
Or we could point out the truth which is that as a passer, Xavi's performances are always dependent on the forwards that he is playing for...in his early years the team was a mess both tactically and with regards to quality of the attackers. When Rijkaard sorted things out (incl. a brief improvement in Kluivert's form) and Etoo/Ronaldinho/Giuly joined, it's no surprise that we started seeing the best of Xavi. You could also see a dip in his form in the 2007-2008 season, when there was a general lack of fitness and thus a lack of movement and effort from the attackers in the team.
People need to figure out what exactly their opinions about Barça and its players are...there's a contradiction in Tweedle's earlier post too. When Messi or Ibrahimovic are to be criticised, it's "oh it's so easy for them at Barça because they have the likes of Xavi and Iniesta supporting", but now Xavi apparently is nothing special because he has Messi and a 65m euro forward helping him Who's helping who here, people? Maybe it's time to realise that football is a team game...and at Barça all the parts are fitting together really well these past few seasons.
I agree that Cesc will probably go on to be a better midfielder than Xavi, but the reasoning some people are using is just rubbish. It's clearly down to their individual qualities, nothing else. Cesc is more mobile, more athletic, more experienced at a younger age due to moving early, and critically, better at finishing and scores more goals.