Monday 28th June - 20.30 (local time)
Johannesburg
All South-American matchup. Brazil destroyed Chile home and away in the qualifiers...have Bielsa's team learnt their lesson?
kas wrote:Brazil (1G) vs. Chile (2H)
Monday 28th June - 20.30 (local time)
Johannesburg
All South-American matchup. Brazil destroyed Chile home and away in the qualifiers...have Bielsa's team learnt their lesson?
mongrel hawk wrote:kas wrote:Brazil (1G) vs. Chile (2H)
Monday 28th June - 20.30 (local time)
Johannesburg
All South-American matchup. Brazil destroyed Chile home and away in the qualifiers...have Bielsa's team learnt their lesson?
true. in fact, brazil destroyed all teams that really tried to attack and win. besides chile, italy (2-0, 3-0), argentina (3-1 away, 3-0 in copa américa), portugal (6-2 in a friendly), uruguay (4-0 away).
but lost 2-0 to Paraguay away, and had problems with defensive teams at home (venezuela and bolivia, 0-0, 0-0 at home).
my prediction, if chile plays like they played today against spain: 4-0.
the problem will be holland. they know how to defend and are unbeaten for a long time.
mongrel hawk wrote:the other day I was talking to a friend and we compared a possible brazil-spain with inter-barça in style. what do you think?
Persistence wrote:Imo Brazil are vulnerable because of the space they give away behind their fullbacks. The DMFs and CDs do not provide cover as well as their Dutch counterparts do. I'm not saying we're better than Brazil, but in that department (everything to do with positional play) we are. Our defenders might not be world beaters individually, but we do defend well as a team. We'll give away very little.
mongrel hawk wrote:@blue
I think brazil is especially designed to beat spain, argentina, germany. not holland, england or... switzerland. maybe you are right, but from what I saw of holland they seem to be very solid marking.
the other day I was talking to a friend and we compared a possible brazil-spain with inter-barça in style. what do you think?
bluenine wrote:mongrel hawk wrote:kas wrote:Brazil (1G) vs. Chile (2H)
Monday 28th June - 20.30 (local time)
Johannesburg
All South-American matchup. Brazil destroyed Chile home and away in the qualifiers...have Bielsa's team learnt their lesson?
true. in fact, brazil destroyed all teams that really tried to attack and win. besides chile, italy (2-0, 3-0), argentina (3-1 away, 3-0 in copa américa), portugal (6-2 in a friendly), uruguay (4-0 away).
but lost 2-0 to Paraguay away, and had problems with defensive teams at home (venezuela and bolivia, 0-0, 0-0 at home).
my prediction, if chile plays like they played today against spain: 4-0.
the problem will be holland. they know how to defend and are unbeaten for a long time.
No they don't... Van Bommel is the only one in that team who does
Agree with you on the rest. This Brasil are built to destroy any team that attacks them... very much like some of the great Italian teams of the past... I cannot see Chile stoppin them... Holland have a great attack, so that game shoudl test the theory whether Brasil indeed are one of the great counter-attacking sides as we believe...
Brasil will find it tough against other good defensive sides... and maybe Argentina, if Maradona has enough sense to be pragmatic.
Ricardo Wetzel wrote:bluenine wrote:mongrel hawk wrote:kas wrote:Brazil (1G) vs. Chile (2H)
Monday 28th June - 20.30 (local time)
Johannesburg
All South-American matchup. Brazil destroyed Chile home and away in the qualifiers...have Bielsa's team learnt their lesson?
true. in fact, brazil destroyed all teams that really tried to attack and win. besides chile, italy (2-0, 3-0), argentina (3-1 away, 3-0 in copa américa), portugal (6-2 in a friendly), uruguay (4-0 away).
but lost 2-0 to Paraguay away, and had problems with defensive teams at home (venezuela and bolivia, 0-0, 0-0 at home).
my prediction, if chile plays like they played today against spain: 4-0.
the problem will be holland. they know how to defend and are unbeaten for a long time.
No they don't... Van Bommel is the only one in that team who does
Agree with you on the rest. This Brasil are built to destroy any team that attacks them... very much like some of the great Italian teams of the past... I cannot see Chile stoppin them... Holland have a great attack, so that game shoudl test the theory whether Brasil indeed are one of the great counter-attacking sides as we believe...
Brasil will find it tough against other good defensive sides... and maybe Argentina, if Maradona has enough sense to be pragmatic.
I agree with you Brasil are favourites against us although their defense is not much better than our defense as you say.. We don't have the best defenders but we have one of the best defensive records in the world for almost a decade now. Still, you and most of the people always bash our defense.
But then I can understand yo don't rate our defense because we have weaknesses up there but one thing I really don't understand is that you praise Argentina while their defense is the weakest from all teams that are in the second round.
bluenine wrote:Ricardo Wetzel wrote:bluenine wrote:mongrel hawk wrote:kas wrote:Brazil (1G) vs. Chile (2H)
Monday 28th June - 20.30 (local time)
Johannesburg
All South-American matchup. Brazil destroyed Chile home and away in the qualifiers...have Bielsa's team learnt their lesson?
true. in fact, brazil destroyed all teams that really tried to attack and win. besides chile, italy (2-0, 3-0), argentina (3-1 away, 3-0 in copa américa), portugal (6-2 in a friendly), uruguay (4-0 away).
but lost 2-0 to Paraguay away, and had problems with defensive teams at home (venezuela and bolivia, 0-0, 0-0 at home).
my prediction, if chile plays like they played today against spain: 4-0.
the problem will be holland. they know how to defend and are unbeaten for a long time.
No they don't... Van Bommel is the only one in that team who does
Agree with you on the rest. This Brasil are built to destroy any team that attacks them... very much like some of the great Italian teams of the past... I cannot see Chile stoppin them... Holland have a great attack, so that game shoudl test the theory whether Brasil indeed are one of the great counter-attacking sides as we believe...
Brasil will find it tough against other good defensive sides... and maybe Argentina, if Maradona has enough sense to be pragmatic.
I agree with you Brasil are favourites against us although their defense is not much better than our defense as you say.. We don't have the best defenders but we have one of the best defensive records in the world for almost a decade now. Still, you and most of the people always bash our defense.
But then I can understand yo don't rate our defense because we have weaknesses up there but one thing I really don't understand is that you praise Argentina while their defense is the weakest from all teams that are in the second round.
Nah, Brasil's defense is much better than yours, mate. I am not saying your defense is bad, its just that Brasil IMO have best defense in the world. And two quality DM's protecting it. Holland's defense has been playing well, but I would like to see how it holds up against quality counterattacking teams... last time round, that was your undoing (Euro08)... and Brasil are the best counter attacking team there is...
Maybe your attackers save you if they have a great game against Brasil (and u have that capability) but IMO 8 times out of ten, Brasil will beat ya.
Re Argentina, its the talent rather than the performance that I am refering to... you can see me qualifying that sentence with a "maybe" and an "if". With the right defensive selection/discipline, Argies could ve been as strong as the brasilians.
Alberto wrote:My scapegoat is Mick Jagger, the fucking kiss of death. That's twice already where he shows up to support a team, and the country gets KO from the World Cup FFS!
mongrel hawk wrote:Alberto wrote:My scapegoat is Mick Jagger, the fucking kiss of death. That's twice already where he shows up to support a team, and the country gets KO from the World Cup FFS!
It seems Jagger will be at the Brazil game to cheer for Brazil (he has a Brazilian son).
....
The most entertaining team I've seen so far is Chile. A team having players who are able to go past an opponent. Chile singlehandedly showed more indivdual moves than about all other countries combined. Because of that they created more chances than anybody else. Easily the most attacking team this WC.
If I compare that with Holland, I notice that Chile has taken over our role, providing flavour to the tourney.
....
One can argue about their (Chile) chances of winning the WC, but at least they showed something.
In the end only 1 of the 32 participating countries will be the Champion. So the odds on winning the title are small, but you're controlling the way you play and have the opportunity to entertain the spectators. Luckily Chile understood that very well.
blutgraetsche wrote:Axe often says very similar things though, you have to admit.
|
|