110% wrote: Mr Wendal wrote: 110% wrote: Mr Wendal wrote: Luis wrote:I don't really understand how people can write sick stuff like that about Muamba or any one for that matter. I don't understand racism either. I know it exists but I can't understand it. It's one thing not to have any empathy for a situation like Muamba's but to go out of your way to abuse him really worries me; these sorts of people need some kind of education.
Lewis did you know that the Khazar Leon Trotsky invented the words Racist/Racism in 1930?
True story.
Who invented the word "racialism"?
That doesn't mean the same thing as Racism:
The word Racialism was first used in 1907:
RACIALISM. - The theory that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race.
The word Racist and Racism where invented by a Khazar to silence debate:
Racism -
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
Do you not see the huge difference between the 2? Racialism just means there are differences between races but the word Racism was invented to brainwash people into thinking that acknowledging differences between races is wrong,elitist and discriminating.Racist means you hate other races,racialism did not jump to conclusions and imply that people who acknowledge differences hate other races.
And Racialism did not only mean something different it was also not widespread across the world like the now universal words racism and racist,it was mainly used in South Africa and sometimes Britain.
So I was right a Khazar did invent the words racist and racism
If you want to argue about terminology then wiki says you are wrong:
Terminology
The Oxford English Dictionary defined racialism as "belief in the superiority of a particular race" and gives a 1907 quote as the first recorded use. The term racism was defined by the OED as "[t]he theory that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race", giving 1936 as the first recorded use. Additionally, the OED records racism as a synonym of racialism: "belief in the superiority of a particular race". By the end of World War II, racism had acquired the same supremacist connotations as racialism: racism now implied racial discrimination, racial supremacism and a harmful intent.
Since the 1960s, some authors have introduced a new meaning for the less-current racialism: Black civil rights activist W. E. B. Du Bois introduced racialism as having the same meaning as racism had prior to WWII, i.e. the philosophical belief that differences exist between human races, be they biological, social, psychological or in the realm of the soul. He reserved the use of racism to refer to the belief that one's particular race is superior to the others (viz., precisely the inverse of the OED definitions).[1]Makes a lot more sense than the khazars did it
If Wikipedia said it it must be true
Khazars own Wikipedia.
I think I trust my source from a dictionary over a website that is owned and edited by Khazars.
RACIALISM. - The theory that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race.
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/racialism-versus-racism/
This website explains the difference between them both, everybody apart from the most deluded is a racialist,it simply means somebody who acknowledges differences between races.
"Strictly speaking, racialism simply means that one accepts the existence of various races of mankind. I doubt if it really means anything more than that. Many racialists feel that there are real and objective genetic differences between the races, but I do not think that that is a requirement to be a racialist.
A racialist would look at things like IQ scores, the makeup of 100-yard dash winners in the Olympics and the NBA, crime rates, etc. and would say that race is a common factor behind these scores. The race-denier would say that, first, there is no such thing as race, and second, that race has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with these discrepancies.
So a non-racialist is, strictly speaking, a race-denier. This position, that there is no such thing as race, has become quite popular lately, but I think it is complete nonsense. A non-racialist would also argue that because race does not exist, all differential racial attributes on various performance, membership and incidence variables is strictly coincidental."
You have been deceived into believing a Khazar didn't invent it,but there's no shame in that for many people have been deceived by these snakes