Tweedle wrote:Parks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:No Chelsea player deserved above a 6 IMO.
Of the Liverpool players, Carra gets an 8 and Gerrard, Masch, Reina and Agger get a 7
Rubbish, Makelele was immaculate. He was the best midfielder on show for me.
Makalele was one of the main hoof-it culprits!
he said they were the better team tonight and the only team trying to winLuis wrote:Mourinho - 'we deserved to be in the final'
unlucky mate, you're not, and you never will be with Chelsea
, we hit the bar and had the best chances
sheva7 wrote:BoBo Vieri wrote:sheva7 wrote:Fey wrote:They should have just tossed for who went through.
Boring game, both teams played incredibly dull football.
Think there is a no 'right' or 'wrong' team, at the end of the day playing as badly as they did chelsea didnt deserve to go through.
But then again, liverpool have gone through playing badly too.
Expected more, was a chance to show the foreign leagues in europe what the english teams can do, and both teams failed miserably today.
Good luck in the final, play that badly again and milan or united will slaughter liverpool.
Not sure...they were awful in the groups stage and against Celtic. Their lack of creativity is ridiculous.
awful? a bit of an exageration though, not brilliant but then its all about peaking at the right time.
I think Milan have plenty of creativity but their lack of firepower is whats worrying since they mainly rely on the midfielders, in partucular kaka, on scoring.
Well, they couldn't score in three groups' stage matches and took more than 180 minutes to score against Celtic. Playing with a single striker doesn't help. I would like to see them winning, but they need to improve a lot.
right back at ya spankParks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:Parks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:No Chelsea player deserved above a 6 IMO.
Of the Liverpool players, Carra gets an 8 and Gerrard, Masch, Reina and Agger get a 7
Rubbish, Makelele was immaculate. He was the best midfielder on show for me.
Makalele was one of the main hoof-it culprits!
Did you watch the game, seriously?
COTR wrote:I don't think some people get itFey wrote:They should have just tossed for who went through.
Boring game, both teams played incredibly dull football.
Think there is a no 'right' or 'wrong' team, at the end of the day playing as badly as they did chelsea didnt deserve to go through.
But then again, liverpool have gone through playing badly too.
Expected more, was a chance to show the foreign leagues in europe what the english teams can do, and both teams failed miserably today.
Good luck in the final, play that badly again and milan or united will slaughter liverpool.
we make each other player badly by being so good.
it is also a skill
we similarly have made united , barca and arsenal look as ordinary this season.. three of the supposed most attacikng teams in the world
Parks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:Parks lives wrote:Tweedle wrote:No Chelsea player deserved above a 6 IMO.
Of the Liverpool players, Carra gets an 8 and Gerrard, Masch, Reina and Agger get a 7
Rubbish, Makelele was immaculate. He was the best midfielder on show for me.
Makalele was one of the main hoof-it culprits!
Did you watch the game, seriously?
Re: De Ja Vu Liverpool vs Chelsea Discussion by Glenarch of the Glen Wed May 02, 2007 12:11 am
waft the hapless youth wrote:It's amazing the influence partiality has on a spectacle. Yes, it was mightily tense towards the end, pens etc, but it was a shockingly bad game IMO.
waft the hapless youth wrote:Ricardo Jol wrote:Zenden impressed me tonight from what I saw. That's a long time ago. The last time he convinced me was when he played for Boro!
He couldn't get the ball off the ground when attempting to cross a few times. Poor performance.
Ricardo Jol wrote:waft the hapless youth wrote:Ricardo Jol wrote:Zenden impressed me tonight from what I saw. That's a long time ago. The last time he convinced me was when he played for Boro!
He couldn't get the ball off the ground when attempting to cross a few times. Poor performance.
Well, I only saw the second half. But if you compare with all the $h!t performances of the rest of the players I thought Zenden played above average. He gave a few good passes and controlled the ball.
I agree, not too special, but hey, we talk about Liverpoo
l!!!
There are no great players in that team.
Parks lives wrote:Maybe near the death, before that when he was controlling the midfield play without any help from Flumps he was playing superbly.
Re: De Ja Vu Liverpool vs Chelsea Discussion by Glenarch of the Glen Wed May 02, 2007 12:18 am
OwenThomas4 wrote:S4P2 wrote:OwenThomas4 wrote:S4P2 wrote:my team didn't win
Parks lives wrote:Well no one on either team deserved an 8 then. Maybe Reina at a push for the penalty saves.
Re: De Ja Vu Liverpool vs Chelsea Discussion by Glenarch of the Glen Wed May 02, 2007 12:22 am
Parks lives wrote:Well no one on either team deserved an 8 then. Maybe Reina at a push for the penalty saves.
Re: De Ja Vu Liverpool vs Chelsea Discussion by Clergyman Superstains Wed May 02, 2007 12:52 am
Not even the defenders? Just because you didn't enjoy it? Nutcase.waft the hapless youth wrote:I agree with Beth, nobody over a 6.
agreed. there was to little football for any of the players to deserve a high grade. its been a long time since i have seen so little football in a top match. in the end mourinho comes out looking really bad because he prob felt he could tear them down physical like with valencia and it did work but somehow liverpool still kept it together. allthough chelsea made them look good in defence too with long balls and not putting in their wingers when finan and riise were tired. i hope he goes so we can see a more attack minded coach but because there is no point in being so defensive and spending alot of money when a club with less money and worse players can do the same job better.waft the hapless youth wrote:No, there was little for them to do, minimal pressure from either attack, bread and butter clearing, very few tackles to make. I can think of one crucial clearance (Carragher) and one crucial block (Essien).
All in all, performances worthy of more than a 6=average, no.
|
|
|
Home