Gareth Bale scored all their goals last season.Kimbo wrote:You spent 70-80 million on attacking players this summer, why can't you score?
They sold him.
Gareth Bale scored all their goals last season.Kimbo wrote:You spent 70-80 million on attacking players this summer, why can't you score?
Deluded F*ck wrote:
WHAM showing that you can pack your team full of big blacks and get quality results, so that's a thumb in the eye for Fey.
Luis wrote:Nope, I've always said he's very over-rated. Ray seems to think he's Iniesta but one league goal ever is frankly dog shit.Puro wrote:He's always been SHITE! but you were NOT observing his game properly. TFS!Luis wrote:Jack Wheelchair is having a stinker.
You'll learn, you're still a young blood.
I never said this.will.i.glenn wrote:
you shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion on any player unless everyone in the team you support is better than all the players from the club he plays for.
The way Lewis jumps from one extreme to the other is actually quite funny. Wenger out #legend
notBigSam @TheBig_Sam 18hIsco Benny wrote:Tactically out witted by Sam Allardyce. Who'd have thunk it.
Watching that game most of Spurs team played like they'd been away and only just arrived back from a vodka party in deepest darkest Russia. Oh wait!
Wham played exactly as expected and Spurs walked straight into it, conceding set pieces and stretching out the defence and midfield trying to pick holes through the centre. Turning point was Defoes miss early second half one on one with Jaaskelainen. From then on failed miserably and ultimately got what we deserved. Not that the title was ever realistic talk but at least now the trolling media will shut the fuck up about it. So many players still in transition , seasoned wily old c**ts like Allardyce and his team of big fuckers packing midfield are going to have success whilst the tactics are to keep trying to play a possession based game reliant on cohesive movement and understanding which only comes with familiarity.
Just waiting for Gaucho to come on here and blame it on Scott Parker.
Diame was excellent for them today. And whilst the first two goals were skanky as fuck, Morrison's was wonderful. Had to applaud that.
PROGRESSDeluded F*ck™ wrote:
WHAM showing that you can pack your team full of big blacks and get quality results, so that's a thumb in the eye for Fey.
the risk kind of balances though because had Villa gone down, it wouldn't have been as much of a financial disaster as it must have been for QPR with the signings and wagebill they'd gotDeluded F*ck™ wrote:How much money does a club lose if they get relegated to the 2.Bundesliga?
Then you have your answer for why many teams in the Prem are so short-termist. Villa took a massive risk last season developing young players and it nearly cost them.
What about compared to the premier league?blutgraetsche wrote:Bundesliga has no 'pathetic strength in depth', quite on the contrary. That's just nonsense.
But I agree actually, we should concentrate on our own issues.
What about last year when the Germans were literally getting thrashed in the europa league?blutgraetsche wrote:Schalke won their group ahead of Arsenal last year and made the semi finals a few years earlier. How is that nothing? German clubs have done pretty well in the Europa League also.
Strength in depth can not just be measured by European success though, that's pretty simplistic, otherwise the EPL strength in depth must be pretty pathetic these days considering the relatively weak showing of EPL clubs in the CL last season.
Bayern and Dortmund may be ahead of the pack in Germany these days, but this does not mean that the rest is just cannon fodder. The league is very competitive and no walk in a park for either of them, despite the current gap in quality. The competition for the European places is very very tough in Germany actually.
But if you look over the last 50 years England have spent most of it being shit, we've just had the odd good team. If we had less foreign players here we would just have a much worse league, and our lack of depth would be more exposed. There's also nothing stopping English players going abroad if they can't get games here, i'm sure foreign clubs hold trials they could attend.blutgraetsche wrote:The premier league is a highly successful, brilliantly marketed league with a very high entertainment value. If this wasn't the case, the league could not be marketed to begin with. There's genuine quality and there are good matches, even if Sky naturally try to sell their product as the best thing since sliced bread, which it isn't.
This said, the criticism aimed at the EPL is primarily not aimed at the league itself, but the consequences it has for English football, not just the English national team. The fact that it has gotten ridiculously expensive to attend to matches, or the influx of foreign owners taking over clubs with huge tradition.
Again, it's not just the national team. The question remains: What is actually 'English' about the Premier League anymore? Less than a third of the players are English, most of the club owners aren't English anymore, hell, probably most of the fans aren't either as it has become a global brand with a truly global reach. The latter is of course positive and other leagues should try to follow the example, but at what cost is this happening in England? Identity is lost. Be honest Kimbo, isn't easier to identify with a player from your own region than someone who has no ties to your club or region whatsoever? If those foreign players are academy products it's a whole different matter, but the vast majority are imports, and due to the financial strength of the league it's usually fully developed players.Kimbo wrote:
But if you look over the last 50 years England have spent most of it being shit, we've just had the odd good team. If we had less foreign players here we would just have a much worse league, and our lack of depth would be more exposed. There's also nothing stopping English players going abroad if they can't get games here, i'm sure foreign clubs hold trials they could attend.
I agree that fans here are treated like customers though, it's not going to change until fans tell their clubs to fuck off, but when they do that they get accused of being disloyal.
I suppose you have heard of the Cardiff owner?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24454963
He's like a weird Asian Mike Ashley.
Fighting is in their blood!Di Caniooooo! wrote:Shocker, Newcastle fans arrested more than any other fan base.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24476130
There's never been an E. Just like the English FA is just "The FA"blutgraetsche wrote:I don't think that quotas are the solution either, but there should be an obligation of the league to support English football, to promote the education of young English players, otherwise they simply should remove the "E" from "EPL".
We have alot of fans and the most reactionary police force in the country. I think we're usually at the top of this table. Imagine if the cockney police arrested every fan that heiled Hitler or made a hissing noise at a Jew? Northumbria police would arrest every single one.Di Caniooooo! wrote:Shocker, Newcastle fans arrested more than any other fan base.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24476130
Local players are good, but overrated, if the talent isn't there you can end up with donkeys like Steven Taylor and Shola Ameobi stinking the place out for a decade.blutgraetsche wrote:Again, it's not just the national team. The question remains: What is actually 'English' about the Premier League anymore? Less than a third of the players are English, most of the club owners aren't English anymore, hell, probably most of the fans aren't either as it has become a global brand with a truly global reach. The latter is of course positive and other leagues should try to follow the example, but at what cost is this happening in England? Identity is lost. Be honest Kimbo, isn't easier to identify with a player from your own region than someone who has no ties to your club or region whatsoever? If those foreign players are academy products it's a whole different matter, but the vast majority are imports, and due to the financial strength of the league it's usually fully developed players.
I don't think that quotas are the solution either, but there should be an obligation of the league to support English football, to promote the education of young English players, otherwise they simply should remove the "E" from "EPL".
P.S.: I wonder when the first club chooses a Haiku as their club anthem...
That's one way of looking at it - however if you are already in cost-cutting mode with the benefit of TV money, and then you get relegated... it's not a good thing, no?debaser wrote:the risk kind of balances though because had Villa gone down, it wouldn't have been as much of a financial disaster as it must have been for QPR with the signings and wagebill they'd gotDeluded F*ck wrote:How much money does a club lose if they get relegated to the 2.Bundesliga?
Then you have your answer for why many teams in the Prem are so short-termist. Villa took a massive risk last season developing young players and it nearly cost them.
Indeed, nothing new, but at least with the building of St George's and the introduction of an u21/18 Premier League and overhauls to the coaching system there are finally quantifiable deliverables that will make the FA accountable in 10 years. In the past, it's been mostly talk little action, but it seems slowly the FA is having it's feet held over the coals and making changes.Kroos wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24467371
State of the Game: Premier League now less than one third English
i am not surprised, arsenal fields more germans than englandz
horrible stats
2 problems: i doubt that england produce enough quality talents (they only produce tim borowskis), 2nd problem, all clubs have to much money, they prefer to buy finished products
well i am not talking anything new here
it wouldn't have been good, no. but would be less disastrous as we wouldn't have been stuck with too many senior players on PL wages.Deluded F*ck™ wrote:That's one way of looking at it - however if you are already in cost-cutting mode with the benefit of TV money, and then you get relegated... it's not a good thing, no?debaser wrote:the risk kind of balances though because had Villa gone down, it wouldn't have been as much of a financial disaster as it must have been for QPR with the signings and wagebill they'd gotDeluded F*ck™ wrote:How much money does a club lose if they get relegated to the 2.Bundesliga?
Then you have your answer for why many teams in the Prem are so short-termist. Villa took a massive risk last season developing young players and it nearly cost them.
At least when QPR spent but it wasn't on a Portsmouth scale.
|
|