Arsenal Vs Man United

But United, in Arsenal's shadow, have been exhilarating in their own fashion.

Ferguson's side has received fewer plaudits

Rabbit wrote:

supermadrid wrote:
i dont want to slice up league in more then 2 groups because i dont think it is needed. there is the top 4 that is supposed world class teams then there is the rest where you should get points.

This is a remarkably naive view of things. There's no point discussing this with someone who doesn't realise Everton are better than Fulham and Portsmouth are better than Derby.

Raifael wrote:

But United, in Arsenal's shadow, have been exhilarating in their own fashion.

Ferguson's side has received fewer plaudits

So so true. Every single pundit says 'Arsenal play the best football in the Premiership' I for one disagree (and this is no bias)

supermadrid wrote:

Rabbit wrote:

supermadrid wrote:
i dont want to slice up league in more then 2 groups because i dont think it is needed. there is the top 4 that is supposed world class teams then there is the rest where you should get points.

This is a remarkably naive view of things. There's no point discussing this with someone who doesn't realise Everton are better than Fulham and Portsmouth are better than Derby.

the reason i seperate the two groups as i do is that the top 4 is supposed to be world class. therefor one cant demand 3 points in these matches since they arent too far from each other.

against the rest its fair to demand 3 points imo even though it could get hard against the likes of everton.

and yes i do consider arsenal getting results against bad sides as a sign of their quality.

in the end it doesnt matter how you get them or how badly you played. so unless you will argue that arsenal will in no way keep that up then i still see arsenal as title contenders.

Raifael wrote:

But United, in Arsenal's shadow, have been exhilarating in their own fashion.

Ferguson's side has received fewer plaudits

So so true. Every single pundit says 'Arsenal play the best football in the Premiership' I for one disagree (and this is no bias)

Parks lives wrote:Man United team -


--------------- van der Sar

Brown ---- Rio -- Vidic --- Evra

--------- Anderson -- Owen

Ronaldo --------------------- Giggs

---------- Rooney --- Tevez


Subs: Kuzy, O'Shea, Carrick, Nani, Saha


Arsenal team, same as against Liverpool.

Raifael wrote:

But United, in Arsenal's shadow, have been exhilarating in their own fashion.

Ferguson's side has received fewer plaudits

So so true. Every single pundit says 'Arsenal play the best football in the Premiership' I for one disagree (and this is no bias)

Rosy wrote:

Raifael wrote:

But United, in Arsenal's shadow, have been exhilarating in their own fashion.

Ferguson's side has received fewer plaudits

So so true. Every single pundit says 'Arsenal play the best football in the Premiership' I for one disagree (and this is no bias)

They do, leaving Chelsea aside I'd rather watch them than anyone else.

crouching punty wrote:Wow,is it true Arsenals team only cost 37 million?

Parks lives wrote:Man United team -


--------------- van der Sar

Brown ---- Rio -- Vidic --- Evra

--------- Anderson -- Owen

Ronaldo --------------------- Giggs

---------- Rooney --- Tevez


Subs: Kuzy, O'Shea, Carrick, Nani, Saha


Liverpool team, same as against Liverpool.

Tweedle wrote:Why Brown over Piqué though? Brown is shite!

crouching punty wrote:Wow,is it true Arsenals team only cost 37 million?

Tweedle wrote:Why Brown over Piqué though? Brown is shite!

Rosy wrote:Lucky bastards

Parks lives wrote:Oh and Anderson has been excellent, that stupid rolling around aside.

Tweedle wrote:Man Utd have had the better of the chances so probably deserve the lead. We haven't been too bad though. Should be a good second half.

Adebayor has been too isolated though and we haven't commited enough men forward so I'd like to see us change to 4-4-2 after half time

Rabbit wrote:Rooney!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!