COTR wrote:fcb wrote:COTR wrote:Why is that interesting Kas?
Why is it not interesting? For starters, it was quite surprising (the Dalglish part, not the Hodgson part). And it also has the potential to stir debate on a variety of different points. Hence, interesting.
We've already been through this a thousand times last year Kas. Did you think that by posting misleading stats that it would reopen a debate that died it's painful death long ago?
Oh, I see, it died "it's" "painful death long ago". The debate is over, finished, resolved, case solved, never to be resurrected.
It turns out to be true, no other set of fans toes the party line quite so obediently