Scoring in one final might be considered flukey, but in 6 finals?
Go f@ck yourself Otto, complete WUM i'd love to smash your dirty German teeth into pieces
Have one on me Pr!ck
Dolly wrote:does anybody on here believe that Gerrard will improve with age
like a good bottle of Fine Wine
or is he more a case of "once the Champagne bottle is opened..."
borocooper wrote:Can we set up a boxing match between FG and Otto?
Dolly wrote:borocooper wrote:Can we set up a boxing match between FG and Otto?
no, we cannot
has something to do with different weight classes, competitive disadvantages and the like
I would accept a boxing match with bernd or fey
might have to shed some extra-poundage though
the mental beer belly that comes from spending too much time on here is beginning to tell
I'd pick axel as a sparring partner
after a week or so my uppercut would be better thanVladimir'sHatton's
wahre g
Dolly wrote:we Germans never understood why the Spartans needed 300 people for a job more suited to 30
different mentality and work methods , I suppose
Dolly wrote:we Germans never understood why the Spartans needed 300 people for a job more suited to 30
110% wrote:
After 3.75 million votes were cast by 277,985 users
Parks lives wrote:110% wrote:
After 3.75 million votes were cast by 277,985 users
So people voted an average of 13 times!?
Allez les rouges wrote:Why don't we just let the Sun choose our world XI?
EMPortuguese wrote:Gerrard is very good probably England's best midfielder but no way he is in the top five(best midfielders) in the world
i prefer Pirlo,Essien,Cambiasso,Iniesta,Scholes,Gattuso, over Gerrard even maybe Hargreaves110% wrote:EMPortuguese wrote:Gerrard is very good probably England's best midfielder but no way he is in the top five(best midfielders) in the world
ok at least acknowledgement that he is england's best midfielder.
so who are your top 5?
and would he be in your top 10?
He is probably better than Hargreaves but i would pick Hargreaves over Gerrard in my team.Parks lives wrote:The England teams best midfielder in front of Lampard, J Cole, Barry and an old Beckham.
What an accolade.
Parks lives wrote:The England teams best midfielder in front of Lampard, J Cole, Barry and an old Beckham.
What an accolade.
EMPortuguese wrote:i prefer Pirlo,Essien,Cambiasso,Iniesta,Scholes,Gattuso, over Gerrard even maybe Hargreaves110% wrote:EMPortuguese wrote:Gerrard is very good probably England's best midfielder but no way he is in the top five(best midfielders) in the world
ok at least acknowledgement that he is england's best midfielder.
so who are your top 5?
and would he be in your top 10?
Dolly wrote:it's like saying
Q: is Ruth pretty
A: not as pretty as she could be; but still incomparibly prettier than Sally Gunnell
EMPortuguese wrote:He is probably better than Hargreaves but i would pick Hargreaves over Gerrard in my team.Parks lives wrote:The England teams best midfielder in front of Lampard, J Cole, Barry and an old Beckham.
What an accolade.
Parks lives wrote:110% wrote:
After 3.75 million votes were cast by 277,985 users
So people voted an average of 13 times!?
Football Genius wrote:Gerrard is not everbodys cup of tea, i can appreciate this.
I was a central midfielder and i always loved watching players like Roy Keane, Bryan Robson, Vieira etc. real box to box midfielders in their hay day.
The real difference between the above and Gerrard is that Gerrard can be looked upon as a match winner whereas the above never really hit as many goals and particularly few in crucial games.
I'd take a fully fit Gerrard in the centre of the park over any other central midfielder in the world, but then i am a Liverpool fan, what we need is somebody behind him who is strong can tackle and has excellent distribution to compliment him perfectly
So you need a world class box2box midfielder to compliment him. OK good luck finding one. Cesc just needed an improved Flamini, Scholes did well with Carrick.Football Genius wrote:Gerrard is not everbodys cup of tea, i can appreciate this.
I was a central midfielder and i always loved watching players like Roy Keane, Bryan Robson, Vieira etc. real box to box midfielders in their hay day.
The real difference between the above and Gerrard is that Gerrard can be looked upon as a match winner whereas the above never really hit as many goals and particularly few in crucial games.
I'd take a fully fit Gerrard in the centre of the park over any other central midfielder in the world, but then i am a Liverpool fan, what we need is somebody behind him who is strong can tackle and has excellent distribution to compliment him perfectly
shazlx wrote:So you need a world class box2box midfielder to compliment him. OK good luck finding one. Cesc just needed an improved Flamini, Scholes did well with Carrick.Football Genius wrote:Gerrard is not everbodys cup of tea, i can appreciate this.
I was a central midfielder and i always loved watching players like Roy Keane, Bryan Robson, Vieira etc. real box to box midfielders in their hay day.
The real difference between the above and Gerrard is that Gerrard can be looked upon as a match winner whereas the above never really hit as many goals and particularly few in crucial games.
I'd take a fully fit Gerrard in the centre of the park over any other central midfielder in the world, but then i am a Liverpool fan, what we need is somebody behind him who is strong can tackle and has excellent distribution to compliment him perfectly