Pierre's Dossier 2009/2010

Stimulus Package wrote:Funny, when it's Gomes on a Liverpool player it is a 'stonewall' '100%' penalty, yet when a virtually identical incident happens with a Man U player people are going to stupid lengths to try to compare it with the Eduardo dive.

I think you're confusing something that actually happened with something that didn't happen.

Johnson wasn't going down before Gomes kidnapped him and took him for a ride around the penalty area. Rooney clearly was. You are such a hypocrite.

Stimulus Package wrote:Funny, when it's Gomes on a Liverpool player it is a 'stonewall' '100%' penalty, yet when a virtually identical incident happens with a Man U player people are going to stupid lengths to try to compare it with the Eduardo dive.

And a bit of Karma for Arsenal anyway after Eduardo.

Axeslammer wrote:What a fucking disgrace that was

Fletcher torpedoes Arshavin and nothing is given, whilst Rooney gets a penalty for a dive

EPL = mockery of a league

"Football is a game of 22 people and in the end the ref makes sure Manchester United wins"

Putting things in perspective : I saw a sickening amount of playacting, diving, matennaaien and playing favourites by the ref in the Eredivisie too today.

I'm sick of football at the moment

I'm an honest player, lies Rooney

Wayne Rooney says he is an "honest player" despite analysis of the crucial penalty he won against Arsenal last weekend revealing he dived.
The north Londoners were denied a penalty of their own, and were leading 1-0 when Rooney converted his spot-kick, and the hosts went on to win 2-1.
Rooney said: "Everyone who watches me play knows I am an honest player.
"I play the game as honestly as I can. If the referee gives a penalty there is nothing you can do."
Amid the furore that accompanied the two-match ban Eduardo has received for "deceiving the referee" during Arsenal's victory over Celtic, Rooney's conduct at Old Trafford was questioned at the weekend.
On initial inspection, it seemed clear Manuel Almunia had put his arms in front of the Manchester United striker before he went tumbling inside the area.
However, TV replays from a certain angle showed Rooney appeared to be heading for the turf before the Arsenal keeper made contact and that the spot-kick should not have been given.
Arsenal intend to appeal against Eduardo's punishment, with Arsene Wenger particularly aggrieved because he believes the Croatian was touched by Celtic's Artur Boruc.
Rooney, 23, said it was up to the authorities to take further action if they felt it was necessary.

"If they want to take punishment further it is down to UEFA and the people who run the game. As players you just want to play."
And the England star says diving, technically described as "simulation", is not a rising trend.
"Diving has been in the game for years. Probably the coverage the game gets now, with all the cameras around, it gets highlighted a bit more. But it hasn't got any worse."
He feels the referee is the best person to deal with such issues, even if there are instances when he might get it wrong.

Thanks

Bizarre article. Not sure who wrote that but i didn't hear anybody outside of forums say it wasnt a penalty, and going down or not it still was a penalty. Fact of the matter is Rooney HAS dived before and not much made of it...now he HASNT dived and a big deal is being made of it.

What a country

sKy pointed out that he started diving before there was any contact, they showed about 50 replays of the incident. MOTD then mentioned it briefly before concentrating on Wanger kicking a water bottle.

Infact I'm yet to see anyone, who isn't a Man Utd fan or an Arsenal hater like Saints, who thinks it wasn't a dive.

That's nonsense. All sky pundits said it was a clear penalty, a slow slow motion replay showed Rooney had the whereabouts to notice he was about to get taken out and prepared for it, but it was a clear penalty and very much not a dive. We could probably find a replay and claim Johnson dived in some form v Gomes or go back 10 years and make out other stuff happenend with slow slow motion replays but the reality is somewhat different unless you're a biase dtwat claiming fritel supports man utd

who are you calling a biase dtwat?

you pike ycunt

Yourself my friend. The writer of that 'article' is just misinformed and totally took a situation the wrong way. Similar to how Rooney saying nice things about his friend Owen means Rooney thinks Owen should be in the England squad.

To avoiding reality to suit agenda's

funny, Sky Sports have a similar article to the one I posted from the bbc

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_5536050,00.html

it's almost as if the press (and the video evidence) have the same biase dtwat-like agenda

To avoiding reality to suit agendas

Adebayor should have got a yellow for a stamp of Cesc and Richards was offside when he headed for Almunia's own goal.

Pwned.

shazlx wrote:Adebayor should have got a yellow for a stamp of Cesc and Richards was offside when he headed for Almunia's own goal.

You're only in the CL due to a dive. What are you complaining about?

Vidic could've had 3 or 4 yellows

debaser wrote:Vidic could've had 3 or 4 yellows

Scholes second looked suspect and a min later Rooney clearly onside and it's ruled offside...in a one on one and not one of those running at pace where the decision can be excused either. I thought the ref had a goodish game though. Crouch uses his arms a lot himself.

"It was a terrible decision," raged Ferguson. "He was sent off because his name is Paul Scholes.

If that's the reason the ref gave then i take back what i said about him having a good game. But deffo a terrible decision.

Probably got sent off for being a horrible little c**t with a silly face.

borocooper wrote:Probably got sent off for being a horrible little c**t with a silly face.

I thought you of all people coops would support a minority ethnic group, such as gingers!

There's usualy one c**t ginger in every generation.

Scholes decided he would just be a big enough c**t ginger for every generation for the next 40.

L r dd wrote:"It was a terrible decision," raged Ferguson. "He was sent off because his name is Paul Scholes.

If that's the reason the ref gave then i take back what i said about him having a good game. But deffo a terrible decision.

I hope that is the reason.

Was almost a harsh 2nd yellow but probably the right decision. Fergle has no right to complain, Scholes has been getting away with allsorts while on a yellow, about time someone had the guts to do something about it.

Vidic should have been sent off 3 or 4 times in the 2nd half, but I've given up getting frustrated by his seemingly neverending supply of get out of jail free cards. Credit to Crouch for not losing his cool with the dirty Serb.

Nemanja Vidic not sent off despite spending the whole game committing yellow and red card offences ?

Well you don't see that every week !

Sooooooooo

Where do we even begin today

COTR #6 wrote:Sooooooooo

Where do we even begin today

Fletcher's 2nd from a joke free-kick, Park somehow didn't get booked in 1st half, the "foul" from Tevez which started the pressure for the winner - FERGIE TIME

COTR #6 wrote:Sooooooooo

Where do we even begin today

It's a fucking circus! FAR WORSE than Moggi's Serie A with Juventus. Over in Serie A it was ONE MAN (Moggi) doing the filthy stuff. Here it is completely institutional. The entire league is behind Mancester United's "success".

It is time to massively expose the HUGE CORRUPTION going on in the league. They get to pick which players should not play against them (Adebayor) to them soft fouls near Citeh's area, to the ridiculously "game's still on 'til Slur Alex team wins".

IT'S A FUCKING DISGRACE. THEY SHOULD HANG THEMSELVES, THEM CORRUPT FUCKOS! Fuck they're far worse than the ones from Perú, and that's saying something.

Puro wrote:Fuck they're far worse than the ones from Perú, and that's saying something.

You know what Puro, I think I believe you

Chelsea will have to win pretty much every game now to stop them. I hope Hughes is allowed to put out an honest interview. If he can't then I guess it'll be up to Rafa to expose everything to the public again.

From what i saw Webb was clearly on Abram's payroll today.

I'm not sure what is most upsetting, Manchester United's corruption, or their fans (who cannot be blamed for the corruption) who justify or turn a blind eye to it.

As far as something being done about it, it would take a major organisation, such as the bbc, to expose them, and they wont do that without solid proof, which wont be forthcoming. But for all we know they are investigating. I will be presenting copies of this dossier to senior officials within the FA and the Premier League.

What's next Glenn, Fergie was responsible for 9/11, the murder of Princess Diana and the disappearance of Elvis?

Stimulus Package wrote:What's next Glenn, Fergie was responsible for 9/11, the murder of Princess Diana and the disappearance of Elvis?

what...? fergie member of the mossaad...?

Stimulus Package wrote:What's next Glenn, Fergie was responsible for 9/11, the murder of Princess Diana and the disappearance of Elvis?

just because someone is a hypocrite, that does not make them wrong